Feigning disinterest in the difference between accuracy and inaccuracy is not ‘objective’ journalism: A case study

Last updated on: February 16, 2016 at 7:29 am by Fred Clark

Feigning disinterest in the difference between accuracy and inaccuracy is not ‘objective’ journalism: A case study 2016-02-15T17:34:25-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Religion News Service should be nominated for some kind of award for So Timid They’re Inaccurate headlines for this bit of equivocation: “Ted Nugent’s Facebook post on guns and Jews draws charges of anti-Semitism.”

Yeah, the touchy PC-crowd is leveling “charges of anti-Semitism” because Nugent said Jews are “punks” and “evil” and that they “hate good over evil,” and because he suggested that all American Jews are disloyal agents of Israel, referred to New York as “Jew York.” Nugent then followed it up with a post describing Holocaust victims as “soulless sheep,” doubly suggesting that Jews are subhuman. Critics are criticizing this as “anti-Semitism,” but that’s apparently just their overly critical opinion and not the whole story. Ugh.

Contrast that awful RNS headline with that of the SPLC’s report on the demented, racist rocker’s posts: “Ted Nugent’s Anti-Semitic Posts Drawing Widespread Criticism.” The SPLC headline, like the one from RNS, acknowledges that the news hook here is the criticism in response to Nugent. “Famously racist man says racist thing,” isn’t actually breaking news. But “Famously racist man finally facing consequences for saying racist things” is.

But note the major difference between these headlines. SPLC accurately identifies Nugent’s remarks as anti-Semitic. Because, in fact, they undeniably are exactly that. The RNS headline balks at making that identification, sub-contracting that designation to unnamed critics. It thus suggests that whether or not Nugent’s hateful remarks are anti-Semitic is a matter of legitimate dispute, and that journalistic objectivity, somehow, requires that both sides of that dispute be respected.

An “objective” disinterest between lies and truth, between accuracy and inaccuracy, is really not helpful.

It’s instructive to look at this latest bit of Nugent news to see how various news outlets handled this headline:

• Nugent’s hometown paper, the Detroit Free Press, passes the test: “Ted Nugent’s anti-Semitic Facebook post blasted.”

• Detroit’s CBS affiliate gets it right too: “Ted Nugent Draws Widespread Criticism For Anti-Semitic, Gun Control Rant.”

• Here’s another good one from a Patch site: “Ted Nugent in Hot Water Over Anti-Semitic Comments.” That uses some old-school headline-ese — “in hot water” — but still manages to be 100-percent accurate and to convey the actual news here — which isn’t that Nugent is in trouble because some critic somewhere is accusing him of something, but that he’s in trouble for what he very clearly did.

• Huffington Post gets it right: “Gun Owners Pressure NRA Over Ted Nugent’s Anti-Semitic Rant.”

• Talking Points Memo covers it well: “Ted Nugent Blames Jews for Gun Control in Anti-Semitic Facebook Rant.”

• The New York Daily News takes a slightly different angle, but still accurately identifies what this story is about: “Ted Nugent defends anti-Semitic message on gun control.”

• The Washington Times flubs the news angle: “Ted Nugent blames Jews for gun control in Facebook posts.” All that does is amplify Nugent’s original post. That’s not reporting, it’s just retweeting.

• The Chicago Tribune correctly and specifically identifies the news angle, but then faceplants — twice — in its conclusion: “NRA urged to remove Ted Nugent from board over ‘anti-Semitic’ outburst.” Problem No. 1 there: Those quotes around the term anti-Semitic are not scare-quotes meant to convey irony, but they’re meant to attribute to designation only to Nugent’s critics thereby, again, suggesting that this designation is a matter of legitimate dispute. Problem No. 2: Even though that’s never what they’re supposed to mean in newspaper headlines, the Trib surely knows that a big chunk of readers interpret them as scare quotes — as signifying that the phrase is meant ironically and should be regarded dismissively, as something so-called-but-not-genuinely-so. This is a terrible headline.

• The Daily Mail, unsurprisingly, also trips over its own tongue: “Ted Nugent under fire for ‘anti-Semitic’ Facebook post calling pro-gun control Jewish politicians ‘Nazis in disguise.’” The Daily Mail is awful. But you knew that.

• The right-wing website NewsMax can’t bring itself to accurately identify the nature of Nugent’s posts: “NRA-Ted Nugent: Gun Owners Seek Distance After Jewish Rant.” Glenn Beck’s Blaze took the same tack: “Ted Nugent Blasted by Jewish Groups (and Gun Owners) Over Facebook Post on Jews and Gun Control.” Rather than accurately state that “Nugent is in hot water over anti-Semitic comments,” they go fuzzy — he simply gave a “Jewish Rant,” something about “Jews and Gun Control.” Maybe that means he recited Isaiah 2:4 in Hebrew. That’s horribly misleading, but at least it avoids the suggestion that some group of unnamed sensitive “critics” are the only ones claiming that Nugent is anti-Semitic.

Uncategorized

journalism

racism

Previous Post

February 15, 2016

NRA: Probably Loretta

Next Post

February 16, 2016 The ongoing Great Disappointment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group follows the Nicene Creed?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Orthodox Jehovah’s Witnesses Baptists Seventh-day Adventists