The 15th anniversary of Cam-Cam

Last updated on: February 2, 2016 at 4:04 pm by Fred Clark

The 15th anniversary of Cam-Cam 2016-02-02T16:04:04-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It’s Groundhog Day, so cinema-wise today really belongs to an enduring American classic and one of the most rewarding spiritual parables ever committed to film. We’re not here to talk about that movie, except to say this: Practice, practice, practice. And to recommend re-watching it as a helpful tonic should you ever make the mistake of watching the movie we are here to talk about.

And that movie — released 15 years ago this very day — is Left Behind: The Movie, starring Kirk Cameron.

Joe Reid reminds us of why today will live in infamy in a Decider piece titled “Left Behind Turns 15: What’s the Legacy of Kirk Cameron’s Rapture?”

Reid’s assessment shows he’s not really familiar with the novel the 2001 movie is based on, which likely means he’s leading a richer, happier life than those of us who have read it. Reid stumbles a bit in points — such as when he suggests that the Nic Cage remake featured Cage reprising Cameron’s role as Cameron Williams (rookie mistake). He also repeats the common mistake of taking Left Behind at its word when it purports to be based on anything the Bible actually teaches.

I think Reid also is unfair to poor Gordon Currie, whose campy turn as Antichrist Nicolae Carpathia is probably the most entertaining thing in all of Left Behind: The Movie. Reid notes that Currie once played cousin Bobby in an episode of Beverly Hills 90210. He was also once the roommate of a then-also-unknown fellow actor named Brad Pitt. The poor guy’s IMDb listing peters out post-Left Behind, which seems cruelly unfair. I’d like to see Brad use his clout to get his old flatmate a shot at something better.

On a lesser point, Reid also dismisses the also-now-15-years-old Head Over Heels as a “Freddie Prinze Jr. romantic disaster.” That’s just plain wrong. It’s actually a charming little Monica Potter romantic thriller. Potter plays an innocent woman who gets embroiled in an international scheme, so of course I’m going to defend this movie. Prinze plays the part of what would be, in the usual versions of this trope, the Mysterious Woman. This gender-reversal of the usual version of this story isn’t novel — Margaret Lockwood got there first in 1938 in Hitchcock’s The Lady Vanishes (which you can, and should, watch online for free). And Head Over Heels stumbles toward the end when it conspires to have Potter rescued from distress by male-savior Prinze. But still, Potter is endearing and it’s a harmless little cookie that’s mostly sweet and tasty, if not altogether nutritious.

If the subject is cinematic awfulness inflicted on the world on February 2, 2001, Head Over Heels doesn’t deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence as Left Behind. I’ll take Monica Potter over Kirk Cameron any day. Heck, I’ll take Freddie Prinze Jr. over Kirk Cameron any day.

Anyway, those quibbles aside, the main point here is what Reid gets very, very right about Left Behind, particularly these two points:

The Plot Is A Blueprint For Nearly Every Right-Wing Conspiracy Theory

The whole crux of the Left Behind mythology is that when the Rapture comes, the Antichrist … will actually emerge from the bosom of the United Nations, that most reliable of right-wing boogeymen. This places Left Behind right at the center of a whole confluence of conspiracy theories. Of this Salon list of 10 right-wing conspiracy theories that have crept into American politics, at least six of them can be found in the Left Behind universe, most of them involving the U.N. and globalization (at one point, a shadowy informant agitatedly tells Cameron’s character that a plot to create one world currency is at the heart of the conspiracy).

World Peace Is A Trick

Speaking of conspiracy theories, the other main tenet of Left Behind is that promises of world peace are merely the beginning of a seven-year reign of evil, before God comes and saves us.

Yes. When the first Left Behind novel was published in 1995, the John Birch Society was an irrelevant fossil, a relic of an earlier generation of paranoia long-banished to the fringes of the far-right fever swamp. It’s ravings were condemned and rejected by every respectable conservative politician and publication. Today we have the tea party movement and a Republican Party that includes a huge Breitbart/WorldNet Daily faction. The John Birch Society itself has been welcomed back into the fold and candidates who embrace its incoherent delirium — Ted Cruz, Donald Trump — are currently the leading contenders for the Republican nomination for president.

I’m not suggesting that Left Behind is solely responsible for this change. Other, larger factors have also played a role — Fox News, the Internet, the proliferation of Limbaugh-inspired talk radio, etc. But the simple fact is that in 1994, Bircher fantasies were not welcome in Republican politics. Then, over the following decade, Tim LaHaye published a series of books devoted to teaching and spreading those fantasies — books that became phenomenal best-sellers read by tens of millions of Americans. Today, LaHaye’s Bircher ideology is a serious factor in our national politics and may prove to be a decisive factor in the election of our next president.

Just consider the increasingly urgent matter of climate change. The current state of American politics regarding that issue cannot be explained by simple partisan polarization. Yes, in our two-party system, every issue tends to devolve into a two-sided debate, but we’ve ended up in a far stranger place than that dynamic alone could explain. Partisan polarization might have given us an ongoing political battle over how to respond to climate change — whether through the market-driven mechanisms once preferred by Republicans or through the more aggressively regulatory approach favored by Democrats.

But Republicans today are not arguing for small-government, market-driven efforts to mitigate and prepare for climate change. Republicans — almost uniformly and unanimously in congressional and presidential politics — are instead dismissing the facts of climate science entirely as a hoax or a conspiracy. This is utterly bonkers — a form of madness that only makes “sense” if one accepts the paranoid conspiracy framework of Left Behind. When Sen. James Inhofe dismisses climate change as a “hoax,” he never explicitly states who it is that supposedly is orchestrating this worldwide, massive conspiracy. He doesn’t need to say it explicitly. Everyone knows. It’s Nicolae Carpathia — the Antichrist

Inhofe, by the way, is now campaigning on behalf of Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Atlantis) — a candidate who supposedly represents the mainstream of the Republican establishment.

Uncategorized

Left Behind

Previous Post

February 1, 2016

NRA: Church board meeting

Next Post

February 3, 2016 When white supremacy is 'conservative' (and vice versa)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book prophesies the destruction of Nineveh?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Obadiah Jonah Zephaniah Nahum