Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Left Behind Classic Fridays, No. 61: ‘Narcissus reflects’

Left Behind Classic Fridays, No. 61: ‘Narcissus reflects’

Last updated on: December 11, 2015 at 7:47 am by Fred Clark

Left Behind Classic Fridays, No. 61: ‘Narcissus reflects’ 2015-12-11T07:47:31-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Originally posted August 26, 2005.

You can read this entire series, for free, via the convenient Left Behind Index. This post is also part of the ebook collection The Anti-Christ Handbook: Volume 1, available on Amazon for just $2.99. Volume 2 of The Anti-Christ Handbook, completing all the posts on the first Left Behind book, is also now available.

Left Behind, pp. 142 – 144

Our narcissistic friend Rayford at last takes a long look in the mirror.

I mean “narcissistic” in the clinical sense, as in NPD, the description of which reads like Cliff Notes character summary for Rayford Steele:

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)

2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love

believes that he or she is “special” and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)

requires excessive admiration

has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations

is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends

lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others

is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her

shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

These final pages of Chapter 8 are a continuation of Rayford’s dark night of the soul. LaHaye and Jenkins do allow their hero a few kernels of self-awareness here, but even these quickly slide back into self-obsession.

We begin with Rayford deciding that this was “the worst season of his life.” He remembers the death of his parents, but decides that this experience is worse:

Rayford had grieved in a way, but mostly he was just sentimental about them. He had good memories, he appreciated the kindness and sympathy he received at their funerals, and he got on with his life. Whatever tears he shed were not from remorse or heartache. He felt primarily nostalgic and melancholy.

The rest of his life had been without complication or pain.

The subject and object of that entire passage is Rayford and only Rayford. We don’t know anything more about his parents as people and we don’t learn much of anything about their deaths other than his feelings about how their deaths affected his feelings. It rings true as a description of detachment, but is itself just as detached.

This occurs in a section in which Rayford is supposed to be hitting a kind of spiritual rock bottom, where he’s supposed to be realizing his own selfishness and sinfulness and need for salvation. Somehow, though, he always seems to be confessing sins other than the actual ones he should be.

There follows a short Rayford’s-eye summary of his painless, uncomplicated life until the present. Here’s his description of becoming a pilot:

He came through the ranks in the usual way — military reserve duty, small planes, then bigger ones, then jets and fighters. Finally he had reached the pinnacle.

The pinnacle? He’s not flying the space shuttle, or landing an F-14 on an aircraft carrier. (See, again, No. 1 above.)

Rayford met his future wife in college:

They were married when Rayford was a senior in college and Irene a sophomore. She dropped out when he went into the military, and everything had been on schedule since. They had Chloe during their first year of marriage but, due to complications, waited another eight years for Ray Jr. Rayford was thrilled with both children, but he had to admit he had longed for a namesake boy.

So here’s a question for all the young ladies in the church youth group: What have we learned today about the role and place of women?

Irene Steele is L&J’s notion of an ideal woman. She is pious and submissive, with no personal ambition beyond getting her MRS degree and then attending to the needs of her husband. This is the ideal of womanhood promoted by Tim LaHaye’s wife, Beverly, and her advocacy group, Ladies Against Women Concerned Women for America.

I’m not sure that women such as Irene Steele really exist, but if they did, they would be caught in a vicious Catch-22. Their only ambition is to marry a good man. But the kinds of men who would be interested in marrying them — the kinds of men who are attracted to servility, who need others to “submit” to their will — are not good men.

As Rayford begins remembering the next phase of his life — the “most trying time” in his marriage — he first lays out his excuses:

Unfortunately, Raymie came along during a bleak period for Rayford. He was 30 and feeling older, and he didn’t enjoy having a pregnant wife. Many people thought, because of his premature but not unattractive gray hair, that he was older, and so he endured the jokes about being an old father. It was a particularly difficult pregnancy for Irene, and Raymie was a couple of weeks late. Chloe was a spirited 8-year-old, so Rayford disengaged as much as possible.

I can’t quite follow the logic of that last sentence. Rayford had a lively young daughter, “so” — therefore — he disengaged as much as possible. Wha-hunh?

The point of view here is third-person sympathetic — it’s Jenkins talking, but offering Rayford’s perspective. So it’s tough to know what to make of that observation about Rayford’s “not unattractive” gray hair. Is it intended to be read as a glimpse of the character’s clownish vanity? While it’s clear that Rayford is clownishly vain, it also seems that the authors are as blissfully unaware of his vanity as the character himself. My guess, then, is that this is Jenkins lurching in and out of his chosen POV in order to reassure readers that the protagonist’s gray hair does not diminish his manly good looks. (And keeping in mind that Rayford seems to function as Tim LaHaye’s Mary-Sue substitute, we can guess which of our coauthors insisted on including this reassurance.)

He was frequently late getting home and at times even fibbed about his schedule so he could leave a day early or come back a day late. Irene accused him of all manner of affairs, and because she was wrong, he denied them with great vigor and, he felt, justified anger.

The truth was, he was hoping for and angling for just what she was charging. What frustrated him so was that, despite his looks and bearing, it just wasn’t in him to pull it off. He didn’t have the moves, the patter, the style. …

Oh yeah, LaHaye and Jenkins know what the ladies want. They want “the moves, the patter, the style …” They make it sound like all Steele needed to do was listen to Billy Dee (“Colt 45. Works every time”).

Despite the pseudo-confessional tone of this passage, Rayford never comes to grips with what seems the likelier explanation for his inability to “pull it off”: He doesn’t like women. I don’t mean that he likes men — I’m sure he’s 100-percent heterosexual (not that there’s anything wrong with that). He just simply doesn’t like women. Some misogynists get their kicks by using, and discarding, women, but Rayford seems to be the variety that can’t even bring himself to touch one. Consider the sentences that immediately follow the passage above:

Sure, he had access to any woman with a price, but that was beneath him. While he toyed with and hoped for an old-fashioned affair, he somehow couldn’t bring himself to stoop to something as tawdry as paying for sex.

It’s not really the idea of paying for sex that Rayford finds “tawdry” and “beneath him.” It’s the women he would have been paying. And it’s not because of the money, or because of the sex, but just because they’re women.

I can’t decide at this point which would be worse: To allow your daughter to read this book, or to allow your son to.

Uncategorized

Left Behind

Previous Post

December 10, 2015

'If X is not wrong, then nothing is wrong'

Next Post

December 11, 2015 Franklin H.P. Graham: 'The glory has departed'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was Paul's original name?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Levi Simon Saul Matthias