Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

LifeWay Research gets it backwards on abortion

Last updated on: December 2, 2015 at 7:45 pm   by Fred Clark

LifeWay Research gets it backwards on abortion 2015-12-02T19:45:53-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Women Distrust Church on Abortion” reads the headline from the Southern Baptist LifeWay Research, announcing the results of a recent survey. This is precisely backwards. The truth is that LifeWay’s church distrusts women. They distrust women when it comes to abortion, and when it comes to almost everything else.

Their churches teach that women are untrustworthy — that they are incapable of being trusted with decisions about anything, including decisions about their own lives. Their churches teach that women are incapable of moral responsibility. This distrust of women is baked into every aspect of those churches — worship, doctrine, polity, all of it. That distrust of women is the cause, not the effect, of the anti-abortion religion that has become the paramount principle of the faith for those churches over the past generation.

The results of this new survey are not surprising. These findings are completely in line with all of the previous surveys from LifeWay and Gallup and Barna over the past several decades which have consistently shown that about a third of church-going white evangelicals believe that abortion should be legal.

PrintThat constant finding has long puzzled the Good Christian Men conducting such surveys and studying the results. How can it be that thirty-some percent of evangelical Christians are pro-choice? That seemed impossible to them because they had not personally heard anyone say such a thing. No one they knew in their churches had ever said anything to challenge the official, required presumption of opposition to legal abortion. They imagine they’ve never met a pro-choice evangelical, so they can’t imagine that even one such creature could exist, let alone that a third of all evangelicals could possibly disagree with what has become the central focus and essential belief in their religious community.

So they assumed this finding — confirmed in poll after poll, year after year — had to be in error somehow. LifeWay, in particular, has aggressively pursued various True Scotsman filters that they’ve hoped would eliminate this impossible anomaly. What if we restrict the definition of “evangelical” to only the most devout — to only those who never miss a Wednesday night prayer meeting and never skip their daily quiet time?* Others have tried to explain away this pro-choice third of evangelicals as some kind of nefarious fifth-column secretly infiltrating the pews for some secret agenda.

But what does that consistent finding really show? It shows simple arithmetic. Roughly half of evangelical Christians are women. And many of those women will have had, or will have considered having, an abortion.** Put those women together with the few others in their churches who they regard as worthy of being trusted with their stories and you easily arrive at that thirty-some percent of evangelicals who believe abortion should be legal.

What that means, of course, is this: Those who doubt it’s really true that a third of all evangelicals support the legal right to abortion are those who haven’t been listening to women in their churches. Or who have established such an aura of reflexively self-righteous moral superiority that no one would ever bother trying to talk to them in the first place.

Anyone who says, “How could a third of evangelicals be pro-choice? I’ve never met such a person” is really saying, “I’m the kind of person who has made it clear that I don’t want to hear from or to listen to anyone else, especially women.”

Because they have met such a person. They’ve met dozens of such people. They just don’t realize it. And because they’ve made it so abundantly clear that they’re incapable of listening to them, or of deeming their stories worthy of being heard, they’ve insured that they’ll never know it.

To their partial credit, LifeWay seems to have finally stumbled across this truth, begrudgingly recognizing that elevating opposition to legal abortion above the greatest commandments may have created a “culture of silence” for those in their churches who know better:

“That tells you the environment of the church,” [LifeWay vice president Scott] McConnell said. “You can’t say you’ve had an abortion, you can’t say you’re considering one — it’s completely taboo to discuss.

“But when a woman is willing to publicly acknowledge she’s had an abortion in the past, she will sometimes be approached by several other women in the church who’ve never been willing to share with anybody that they too have had an abortion. It’s incredibly freeing for them.”

Unfortunately, the only solution to such a culture of silence that McConnell can imagine is encouraging women to publicly confess their “past” abortions as sins for which they have been forgiven. If they’ll only admit, like Mike Warnke, that they used to be Satanic baby-killers, but that God has now forgiven them and washed them clean, then we can all go back to pretending like this was something that should always be illegal. Such conversion narratives could then become a tool for reinforcing the most important principle here — that women cannot be trusted, and that the force of law is required to prevent these foolish sub-humans from making decisions for themselves.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

* LifeWay’s newest survey finds that 70 percent of women who have had abortions identify as Christians, and that 43 percent of those Christian women attend church regularly, at least once a month.

And thus, as you read this, Ed Stetzer et. al. over at LifeWay will be busily seeking some way to whittle down that unacceptable, unpossible result by doing what they always do. They’ll say once a month shouldn’t count as regular church attendance. They’ll parse and split hairs in an attempt to show that perhaps those who attend every week have some lower rate. What if we only count Christian women who attend church more than twice a week and also teach Sunday school? They’ll seek some way to show that it can’t be true that Real, True Christian women could really be reflected in these findings.

That effort only serves to reaffirm their central conviction: Women are not to be trusted. This whole approach to separate women who “identify as Christian” from the far fewer who should really be counted as Real, True Christians is based on the belief that women can’t be trusted to tell the truth about their faith.

It may be, as with previous LifeWay research on divorce or attitudes toward LGBT people, that they’ll manage to dissect the data enough to show that hyper-involvement in their churches does, in fact, show some slight statistical significance. But then they’ll just wind up repeating the same fallacy that we see from so many True Scotsman studies on Catholics and divorce. Those studies show that divorced Catholics are less likely to regularly attend Mass. This is touted as evidence that regular attendance at Mass prevents divorce. The possibility that cause and effect work the other way — that the Church’s condemnation of, distrustful inability to listen to, and inhospitality toward, divorced people results in such people being less likely to attend regularly — never seems to occur to them.

** Yes, there are also plenty of evangelical Christians who have abortions for themselves, or help to arrange them for others, but who remain staunchly anti-abortion for everyone else. The self-exempting moral hypocrisy Marie Myung-OK Lee describes, or that Joyce Arthur documented years ago in “The Only Moral Abortion Is My Abortion,” is real, but I don’t think it’s true of most evangelical women who have had, or considered, abortion for themselves. And in any case, those self-exempting folks wouldn’t be among the third of evangelicals telling pollsters that they believe abortion should be legal.

evangelicals

abortion

church

gender

religious right

Satanic baby-killers

SBC

Previous Post



December 2, 2015

Today's American mass shooting ...

Next Post



December 3, 2015 Advent Calendar Day 3


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was Cornelius' profession?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fisherman Carpenter Shepherd Roman centurion

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

Is this the right room for an argument?

slacktivist

Family

The Amish are not 'Evangelicals.' They're Amish.

slacktivist

Family

The lumpers, the splitters, and me

slacktivist

Family

'Is it right on red or left on...

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

This is a recovery effort. In 2002, My Big Fat Greek Wedding...

Top Three Anti-Catholic Lies About Catholicism

  This is my initial transcript for the video, "THE 3 WORST...

Pope Leo Celebrates Mass for Nurses & Docs...

I don't have any idea how he did it, but Pope Leo...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I: Matthew...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I (Matthew 4:12-5:12) St. Matthew moves...

What's up from Crossway

What's up from Crossway: Reviewing some of their latest A few weeks...

Janie Learns the Way of the Cross: A...

Teaching children about Jesus' Passion can be challenging. Many parents and educators...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube