‘The propriety of the nation must be startled’

Last updated on: August 14, 2015 at 3:05 pm by Fred Clark

‘The propriety of the nation must be startled’ 2015-08-14T15:05:37-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here are two contrary perspectives stated with clarity. Side A was presented yesterday by Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver, D-Missouri, in an interview with The Hill discussing the tactics of Black Lives Matter protesters:

“I don’t think that it’s acceptable, nor do I think that it’s beneficial for African-Americans — or anyone else for that matter — to develop as a tactic the acts of verbal incivility that I saw,” Cleaver said by phone, referring to the Sanders incident in Seattle. “Being civil is far more powerful than being right. What we as African-Americans must keep in mind is we did not achieve the progress that’s so visible around the world from tactics of disrespect and nastiness.”

Cleaver was quick to praise the underlying message and goals of the Black Lives Matter movement — “Progress always sits on the backs of those who refuse to accept things as they are,” he said — but countered that the more effective strategy would be to follow the less-confrontational examples of Martin Luther King, Jr., Nelson Mandela and Jesus.

“You can get your message out without shouting people down on stage,” he said. “We ought to be civil whenever possible, and frankly it’s always possible.”

Here is Side B, from Frederick Douglass, a member of the original BLM crew, speaking 163 years ago:

At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument, is needed. O! had I the ability, and could I reach the nation’s ear, I would, to-day, pour out a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke. For it is not light that is needed, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake. The feeling of the nation must be quickened; the conscience of the nation must be roused; the propriety of the nation must be startled; the hypocrisy of the nation must be exposed; and its crimes against God and man must be proclaimed and denounced.

No disrespect intended to Rep. Cleaver, but I’m going to have to side with Douglass on this one because, well, disagreeing with Frederick Douglass is almost always a really, really bad idea.

I’m also going to assume, out of respect for Cleaver, that The Hill’s reporter did him a disservice by paraphrasing part of his comments this way: “the more effective strategy would be to follow the less-confrontational examples of Martin Luther King, Jr., Nelson Mandela and Jesus.” Because that’s a hilariously self-refuting selection of “less-confrontational examples.”

King, Mandela and Jesus were confrontational — so much so that all of them have become icons of confrontation. All three of them had a long rap sheet consisting entirely of “crimes” of confrontation. All three of them faced perpetual death threats from those they confronted. The FBI tried to blackmail King into suicide and he was gunned down before he turned 40. Mandela was sentenced to life in prison, spending 27 years behind bars for the crimes of “incitement” and sabotage. And Jesus, you may recall, was flayed and crucified by the Empire.

Those three are remembered and revered not because they were “less-confrontational,” but because they managed to confront, relentlessly, while retaining a startling, grace-full capacity to love those they were confronting. That love sometimes expressed itself in civil ways, but it was, more often, determinedly unconstrained by the pieties and proprieties of “civility.”

To represent King, Mandela and Jesus as exemplars of civility is to misrepresent them. To reduce love to civility is a vicious, uncivil falsehood.

Any discussion of the “civility” of the confrontational tactics of King, Mandela and Jesus is also woefully beside the point. This is a central theme of that holy scripture from Douglass quoted above. The only matter of civility worth discussing, Douglass said, was the glaring, monumental, all-consuming fact of the incivility of slavery.

Was Martin Luther King Jr. impeccably civil? Wrong question. Wickedly wrong question. Jim Crow and segregation and voter suppression were “uncivil.” Any discussion of King’s civility or incivility is a pernicious dodge in service of the effort to ignore that overwhelming fact.

Was Nelson Mandela unfailingly civil? Wrong question. Apartheid and economic oppression were uncivil. Talking about Mandela’s civility or incivility is a distraction from that that only serves to fortify the injustice he opposed.

Was Jesus civil? The short answer is No. But more importantly this is, again, the wrong question. It’s a question that leads us, inevitably, away from who Jesus was and what he said and why he said it. It’s a question that starts, and ends, with disproportionate concern for the manner of confrontation and disregard for the necessity of it.

Injustice is uncivil. Injustice conscripts civility into its own service. When that happens, “it is not light that is needed, but fire” and “the propriety of the nation must be startled.”

class warfare

civility

justice

Previous Post

August 14, 2015

Left Behind Classic Fridays, No. 46: 'The Good Wife'

Next Post

August 16, 2015 Sunday WTF?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which parable illustrates God's joy over one sinner who repents?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Sower The Ten Virgins The Two Sons The Lost Sheep