Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
#JamesConeWasRight. #JamesBoyceWasWrong.

#JamesConeWasRight. #JamesBoyceWasWrong.

Last updated on: June 24, 2015 at 12:35 pm by Fred Clark

#JamesConeWasRight. #JamesBoyceWasWrong. 2015-06-24T12:35:07-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles? In the same way, every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus you will know them by their fruits.

— Matthew 7:15-20

Yesterday, Al Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Seminary and the most prominent spokesman for Southern Baptist conservatives, wrote a post titled “The Heresy of Racial Superiority — Confronting the Past, and Confronting the Truth.”

To Mohler’s credit, he genuinely seems to be trying to do that — to confront the past and the truth, and what it means for him and his institution to be carrying on the legacy of men he acknowledges were, undeniably, white supremacists. He’s not just whistling Dixie here. Mohler takes a (mostly*) forthright look at the reality of his conservative Southern Baptist heroes of the past and attempts to being grappling with what it means that they were so thoroughly, enthusiastically, sinfully wrong on a matter of great and central importance.

Here’s the heart of Mohler’s post:

More humbling still is the fact that many churches, churchmen, and theologians gave sanction to that ideology of racial superiority. While this was true throughout the southern churches, Southern Baptists bear a particular responsibility and burden of history. The Southern Baptist Convention was not only founded by slaveholders; it was founded by men who held to an ideology of racial superiority and who bathed that ideology in scandalous theological argument. …

I gladly stand with the founders of the Southern Baptist Convention and The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in their courageous affirmation of biblical orthodoxy, Baptist beliefs, and missionary zeal. There would be no Southern Baptist Convention and there would be no Southern Seminary without them. James P. Boyce and Basil Manly, Jr. and John A. Broadus were titans of the faith once for all delivered to the saints.

But there is more to the story. Boyce and Broadus were chaplains in the Confederate army. The founders of the SBC and of Southern Seminary were racist defenders of slavery. Just a few months ago I was reading a history of Greenville, South Carolina when I came across a racist statement made by James P. Boyce, my ultimate predecessor as president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. It was so striking that I had to find a chair. This, too, is our story.

These are the 19th-century Founding Fathers of Mohler’s seminary and his denomination. For more than 20 years, Mohler has devoted himself to reshaping that seminary and that denomination in their image. These are the men who wrote the “Abstract of Principles” that Al Mohler used as a cudgel when he became president of Southern Seminary in 1993, casting out the supposedly “liberal” and “moderate” faculty and explicitly, forcibly aligning the school with the theology of Boyce, Broadus and Manly.

So I appreciate the candor and courage of what Mohler is attempting to do here. He’s basically the president of the Boyce and Broadus Fan Club, and he doesn’t wish to step down from that post. His own legacy is defined by and inextricably linked to the legacy of the very men he here condemns as “heretics.”

He pulls that punch, a bit, at the end, with a technical argument about charges of heresy requiring that the heretic be personally “confronted” with the charge. But it doesn’t seem like he expects this technical defense to convince anyone else any more than it seems to convince himself. He sees the core problem, and seems to realize that it is a fundamental problem for fundamentalists like himself:

And now the hardest part. Were the founders of the Southern Baptist Convention and The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary heretics?

They defended all the doctrines they believed were central and essential to the Christian faith as revealed in the Bible and as affirmed throughout the history of the church. They sought to defend Baptist orthodoxy in an age already tiring of orthodoxy. …

But I would argue that racial superiority in any form, and white superiority as the central issue of our concern, is a heresy. The separation of human beings into ranks of superiority and inferiority differentiated by skin color is a direct assault upon the doctrine of Creation and an insult to the imago Dei — the image of God in which every human being is made. Racial superiority is also directly subversive of the gospel of Christ, effectively reducing the power of his substitutionary atonement and undermining the faithful preaching of the gospel to all persons and to all nations.

To put the matter plainly, one cannot simultaneously hold to an ideology of racial superiority and rightly present the gospel of Jesus Christ. One cannot hold to racial superiority and simultaneously defend the faith once for all delivered to the saints.

Readers of this blog know that I bear little affection or respect for R. Albert Mohler Jr. But I respect this statement and the attempt he seems to be genuinely beginning here.

We’ll come back to this in more detail, but I don’t think Mohler yet recognizes the full scope of what it means when he says, correctly, that “one cannot simultaneously hold to an ideology of racial superiority and rightly present the gospel of Jesus Christ.” The truth of that depends on a deeper understanding of both of those things, and I don’t think Mohler recognizes the full scope of either one — neither the “ideology of [white] superiority” nor “the gospel of Jesus Christ.”

James H. Cone is right. James P. Boyce was wrong.

For a sense of why Mohler is not prepared to evaluate the theology of his hero, James P. Boyce, let me turn to Daniel José Camacho’s recent discussion of one of his theological heroes, James H. Cone. Here is a bit of Camacho’s “Why James H. Cone’s Liberation Theology Matters More Than Ever“:

One cannot properly understand Cone’s claims about Black Power and God being black without understanding how Christianity got wrapped up with White Power in the first place — and made God white.

Cone’s project is not simply about experience but is a direct assault on theology’s entanglement with white racism. Cone was critiquing whiteness before virtually anyone in the theological academy realized what it was or the fact that it was a problem.

… How was it that the black church went ignored so long? Cone rethought U.S. church history by seeing it in light of the crucified. The black church that the white theological builders had rejected was actually the hermeneutical cornerstone for properly understanding God and Jesus.

… Some have juked Cone’s theological critique by blaming the problem on ethics. In other words, “Orthodox” theology is faultless but has been at times simply misapplied or not faithfully lived out. These critics say we should be sympathetic to Cone’s passion but reject his answers as “unbiblical and untenable.” But part of Cone’s brilliance was to avoid such an unhealthy disconnect between theology and ethics. If Cone is right (and I think he is), then we can’t keep using the master’s theological tools as they are to dismantle his church. If the theological well keeps yielding poison, we need to question that well and remember that God is the source of life.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

* Mostly. He flinches a few times in this piece and occasionally lapses into his usual habits.

For example, after first mentioning the trio of James P. Boyce, Basil Manly Jr. and John A. Broadus as “titans of the faith” without whom “there would be no Southern Baptist Convention and there would be no Southern Seminary,” he goes on to say that “Boyce and Broadus were consummate Christian gentlemen, given the culture of their day. They would have been horrified, I am certain, by any act of violence.” What happened to Manly, there? Well, he was known to have whipped “his” slaves and thus the whole “consummate Christian gentleman”/benevolent-trafficker-of-persons shtick Mohler offers in partial defense of Boyce and Broadus won’t work for him.

And, apparently, neither Boyce nor Broadus was so “horrified” by Manly’s violence against enslaved persons that they expressed any qualms about working with this slave-whipping theology professor to found their seminary.

Previous Post

June 23, 2015

Surprising photos of celebrities without makeup!

Next Post

June 24, 2015 The Southern Baptists' White Abstract of White Principles

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I am a promise made to a childless man that his descendants would be as numerous as the stars. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God's promise The covenant with Abraham Circumcision The New Covenant