Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
David Brooks is Vice Principal Strickland, only even less truthful

David Brooks is Vice Principal Strickland, only even less truthful

Last updated on: June 17, 2015 at 7:17 pm by Fred Clark

David Brooks is Vice Principal Strickland, only even less truthful 2015-06-17T19:17:21-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is what fact-checking looks like, in practice: “The facts vs. David Brooks: Startling inaccuracies raise questions about his latest book.”

David Zweig takes a single claim from Brooks’ latest best-selling book, The Road to Character, and goes after it like a terrier. It’s a startling statistic that Brooks and his publicists have repeated over and over because it so perfectly captures the central point of Brooks’ argument about what’s wrong with Kids These Days.

Zweig initially sought to confirm this fact because he wanted to cite it himself in support of his own, somewhat similar argument. Initially, in other words, Zweig was hoping the claim would be true and that he’d be able to document it and repeat it with greater authority than a second-hand quote.

But the claim wasn’t true. The “fact” was not, in fact, a fact.

As it turns out, this “fact” was little more than a lazy regurgitation of the same crap that older people have been saying about younger people forever. Brooks wasn’t citing a real statistic, he was simply recycling an old rant about What’s Wrong With Generation X and retrofitting it into a new rant about What’s Wrong With Millennials.

Here was the version of the claim Brooks made in a lecture at the 2011 Aspen Ideas Festival:

In 1950 the Gallup Organization asked high school seniors “Are you a very important person?” And in 1950, 12 percent of high school seniors said yes. They asked the same question again in 2006; this time it wasn’t 12 percent, it was 80 percent.

Brooks intends this to be a damning indictment of spoiled, irresponsible youth and their generation’s arrogant sense of entitlement. But nothing about that is true. Nothing.

Zweig tenaciously tracks down the tiny nugget of reality out of which Brooks spun this tapestry of bullshit. Some academics collected some data from Minnesota ninth-graders in 1948 and 1954. Later, in 1989, some other academics did a slightly larger study of 14-to-16-year-olds, and asked them that same question, “Are you a very important person?”

This part of the 1989 study was trying to gauge “Ego inflation” among young people — roughly the same attitude of entitlement Brooks is harrumphing against. The overall study suggested little change in such “Ego inflation” between 1948 and 1989. The only such measure that changed significantly was how young people responded to this one question: “Are you a very important person?”

The researchers thus speculate that what’s really going on here is a change in how young people hear and understand that question:

The words “I am an important person” may have been interpreted differently in the ’40s and ’50s, than in 1989. [Researcher Robert] Archer said that the early sample may have interpreted the item as meaning “more important than others” whereas the ’80s sample may have read it to mean “I believe I am a valuable person.”

Ah, there it is. The question is ambiguous — offering two equally valid interpretations.

“Are you a very important person?” could, possibly, mean something like “Do you think you’re more important than everyone else?” And that’s likely what it sounded like to Minnesota Lutheran kids in 1954. But it can also be understood to mean something like, “Do you believe that every human being has intrinsic value and dignity?” or, in other words, “Do you think you’re just as important as everyone else?” And that’s likely how it sounded to most kids in 1989.

For all his indignant talk about humility, I suspect the latter formulation is also how David Brooks hears and understands that question. He seized on this small study, embellished and inflated it, and then inverted the meaning of its conclusions in order to use it as ammunition against the unacceptable arrogance of Millennial upstarts.

But Brooks isn’t upset that Kids These Days think they’re more important than everyone else. He knows that’s not what this study showed. What upsets him is that Kids These Days think they’re just as important as everyone else — including him.

David Brooks, in other words, is angry that Kids These Days lack the proper humility that would require them to acknowledge that he is more valuable than they are.

The problem Zweig identifies here is not just a factual error or sloppy research that resulted in Brooks getting “nearly every detail of this [claim] wrong.” Brooks doesn’t just get the facts and the details wrong, he’s making a theological claim.

And that theological claim is garbage.

Here’s the thing: You are, in fact, a very important person. You are precious. You are of infinite, inestimable value. You are a child of God and a bearer of the divine image. You are special.

And that is also true, of course, of every other person you will ever meet. (This is part of why “sin is when you treat people as things.”)

That flows directly from the greatest commandment and from the second which is like unto it.

I learned both parts of that from my parents, and from my church, and from Fred Rogers, and from the Rev. Jesse Jackson.

And both parts are equally necessary and important. You’re no more valuable than anyone else, and no one else is more valuable than you. If you believe that you are of infinite, inestimable value, but you fail to recognize that’s true of everyone else, too, then you’re headed to runaway ego inflation and the sin of treating people as things. If you recognize that others are of infinite, inestimable value, but you fail to recognize that’s also true of you, then you’re headed for misery and the sin of mistaking yourself for a thing.

Brooks — whether from ignorance or from pretense — is claiming that Kids These Days have over-inflated egos. They think they’re special.

If that’s the problem, then the solution ought to be to remind such supposedly entitled young people that everyone else is special too. But that is not Brooks’ project. He intends, instead, to correct these arrogant youngsters by telling them they’re not special, they’re not valuable, they’re not important.

And that, again, is theological garbage. It is a denial of the doctrines of creation, incarnation, redemption and resurrection.

It’s also boring. It’s the same old same old from the same old olds. “You’re a slacker, McFly,” Vice Principal Strickland said in 1955 and 1985 and 2015. And slackers, of course, are worthless, because they fail to accept the superior worth of the Stricklands and the Brookses and the rest of their ego-inflated, entitled, spoiled elders.

Update: Headline fixed because there’s no such thing as a “Vince Principal”

class warfare

Previous Post

June 17, 2015

People in your home state are shocked by this new law!

Next Post

June 18, 2015 A prayer in a sanctuary

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to Colossians, what has been raised with Christ and should we set our hearts on?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Things above, where Christ is seated The kingdom of God The gospel message Eternal life