Qoheleth and the ‘Third Way’

Last updated on: September 21, 2014 at 6:59 pm by Fred Clark

Qoheleth and the ‘Third Way’ 2014-09-21T18:59:16-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There are two kinds of people in this world: Those who divide everyone into binary categories, and those who do not.

Qoheleth, the delightfully downbeat author of the book of Ecclesiastes, seems a bit hung up on binaries in the passage I highlighted in this morning’s “Sunday favorites” post.

Again I saw all the oppressions that are practiced under the sun. Look, the tears of the oppressed — with no one to comfort them! On the side of their oppressors there was power — with no one to comfort them. And I thought the dead, who have already died, more fortunate than the living, who are still alive; but better than both is the one who has not yet been, and has not seen the evil deeds that are done under the sun.

I love the brutal bleakness of this passage. Elsewhere, the book of Ecclesiastes pulls its punches a bit, cushioning its conclusion of “vanity, vanity” and “meaningless, meaningless” with a garnish of pious platitudes. Whether or not you believe those half-hearted affirmations are the work of some later editor, you have to agree that they’re out of tune with the rest of the book — discordant grace notes that don’t ring true enough to be convincing. It’s refreshing here to hear Qoheleth’s main theme being played here without those distracting elements.

If anyone ever tells you that existentialism didn’t start until the 19th century, just say, “There is nothing new under the sun.”

But here I want to argue with Qoheleth’s sweeping binary assessment of “all the oppressions that are practiced under the sun.” The existence of those oppressions, he suggests, mean that everyone falls into one of two categories: the oppressed (most people) or the powerful who oppress them. The oppressed, he notes, are miserable. And the only other option discussed here is to be among the oppressors — who also turn out to be miserable (albeit, better fed).

Those are our options: misery or misery. Thus, he concludes, the dead are more fortunate than the living. And then, unsatisfied in that case with the binary options of dead or alive, he concludes that “better than both” are those who have never been born at all.

Not very cheery stuff.

Fortunately, though, I don’t think Q’s analysis is really accurate. “All the oppressions that are practiced under the sun,” are, indeed, a dismal sight, but I think — or, at least, I hope — that “the oppressed” and “the side of their oppressors” do not exhaust the full range of possibilities.

There is also, of course, a Third Way. That is the way of people like myself — educated, privileged bourgeous critics of the oppressors. We are uniquely positioned to ride in on our white horses, substituting our voices for the silence of the voiceless oppressed. We alone can see both sides, comforting both alike. We can be above the fray, so we never need to get bogged down defending any commitment in the midst of it. We can be the heroic allies who rescue the downtrodden while redirecting the power of the powerf …

Wait, no, sorry, not that.

And that’s the frustrating thing these days — we need other options if we want to escape from the miserable binaries that Qoheleth describes so well. But the language to describe such options has been co-opted by “Third Way” talk that advocates the unprincipled, obsequious “centrism” of a Joe Lieberman for President brochure.

That kind of “moderate” or “centrist” approach doesn’t escape the binary situation Ecclesiastes describes. Qoheleth’s analysis was sophisticated enough to account for it. He didn’t just divide the world between “the oppressed” and the oppressors, but between “the oppressed” and “the side of their oppressors.” That latter category was thus expansive enough to include all the toadies and lackeys who actively enable that side, as well as all the bystanders, apologists, and “centrists” who passively lubricate the machine of power.

Try to explain to Qoheleth that you’re neither oppressor nor oppressed, but that you’re seeking a “balanced” centrism, and I imagine he’d blink once or twice, patiently, then mark you down with the others in the “side of their oppressors” category.

Sarah Moon had a terrific post recently in which she vented her frustration over the way “Third Way” language has been co-opted to fortify this binary system. She enlists Walter Wink for help in “Reclaiming ‘Third Way'” from such unctuous abuse. For Wink, and for Jesus, she argues:

Third Way is about refusing to be trapped in limiting binaries. It’s about finding creative ways to work toward justice. It’s not about keeping the peace. It’s not about making everyone happy. It’s not about sitting on the fence.

God works in mysterious ways (Third Ways?), but God is not concerned with cheap “peace.” God wants shalom. God wants justice. And God always, always sides with the oppressed.

We need lots of ways. We need Third Ways and Fourth Ways and Five Hundred Ways. Oppression is subtle and adaptable and multi-faceted. We need all the “ways” we can get. But a Third Way that tries to “see both sides,” while refusing to actually challenge oppressors is not God’s Third Way.

That’ll preach.

So let’s talk about some of those Fourth Ways and 500th Ways. I have some thoughts and some ideas about this, but before I offer those, I want to ask what you see, here, in response to the binary Qoheleth lays out in Ecclesiastes 4. What other categories exist beyond those he describes? What other categories are preferable? What other categories are possible?

Previous Post

September 21, 2014

Driving late at night I let you listen to the music you like

Next Post

September 22, 2014 I'm re-thinking what I've come to doubt

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How old was Abraham when Isaac was born?

Select your answer to see how you score.

100 years old 110 years old 90 years old 80 years old