Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

I know what I want, I know what I need

Last updated on: April 4, 2014 at 5:59 pm   by Fred Clark

I know what I want, I know what I need 2014-04-04T17:59:54-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

• I’ve seen this ad. I’ve seen a lot of this ad:

• Republican Rep. Randy Weber of Texas: Ignorant and really, really proud of it. This climate-change denying moron is supposed to be protecting the interests of Texas’ 14th District — that’s along the Gulf coast. Here’s a map of Weber’s district, and alongside that a map of Weber’s district with the kind of sea-level rise predicted within the next century or so:

That purple shading is the part that will be underwater, thanks to the hard work of denialists like Randy Weber. “What we don’t know can hurt us.”

• Parents send daughter to private Christian school in Virginia, then learn private Christian school is run by creepy, creepy, creepy control freak men.

• Re: The Blacklist, the non-Spader parts of the show are finally starting to get interesting. Here’s my theory: Reddington is Lizzie’s father, of course, but he’s also Magic Barreling her and Pressler.

• AIDS-denying, racist Christian spokesperson Bryan Fischer has apparently never seen a full episode of Modern Family: “And then we have the same-sex male family where we have a man and man in a loving, committed relationship that just doesn’t have any, any problems.” Is there some other gay couple on that show that I’ve missed, or does Fischer really think this is an apt description of Cam and Mitchell? I guess Fischer just can’t help himself — he even lies about fictional gay couples.

• Here is an odd measure of progress of a sort: Far-right fringe whackjob Jim Garrow is way, way out there — part of the Alex Jones orbit out past even Glenn Beck and Louie Gohmert. Garrow’s latest theory involves a stealth invasion by undercover Chinese soldiers, orchestrated by President Obama to launch a global Islamist Caliphate while distracting the world with a fake announcement about first contact with aliens.

But in the midst of explaining this theory, Garrow said this about President Obama: “He doesn’t present as an American.” What that means, of course, is that the president is black, black, blackety black. But even Jim Garrow knows enough to realize that he can’t just say that. Even the weirdest, fringiest far-right conspiracy theorists know that explicit racism has to be expressed euphemistically lest it potentially alienate even parts of the weirdest, fringiest, far-right conspiracy theory audience.

That could be seen as a kind of extremely modest progress. (Although, of course, the fact that I’m willing to latch onto something so flimsy as a hopeful sign is, itself, a kind of evidence of how extreme and intractable our culture of racism remains and of how very much progress is still required.)

• Susan Pigott offers a smart response to the claim that progress is “inevitable.” Her specific subject is women’s equality in the church, but I think her general point applies to most kinds of progress:

Women in ministry are not inevitable just as no social cause is inevitable. The end of slavery wasn’t inevitable. African Americans and women winning the right to vote wasn’t inevitable. Civil rights wasn’t inevitable. These things happened because brave people took risks to make them happen.

I’d add that African Americans and women keeping the right to vote is not inevitable. Anyone keeping the right to vote is not inevitable. Especially not with a Supreme Court that says Congress may not act to protect voters from being disenfranchised, while also saying that it may not interfere with the “right” of the wealthy to purchase political influence.

Progress is always possible, but it is never inevitable. Regress is also always possible, but it is never acceptable.

• Speaking of progress, here is an another ad. This one is about graham crackers and the most excellent way:

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



April 3, 2014

Young-Earth creationism and the problem of telescopes (part 2)

Next Post



April 5, 2014 What kind of story is this?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book follows the Gospels in the New Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hebrews Acts Romans 1 Corinthians

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

Some obscure footnotes of white evangelical history

slacktivist

Family

The purpose-driven labor priest

slacktivist

Family

'A hermeneutical Pandora’s box'

slacktivist

Family

No, most white evangelicals are not 'egalitarian'

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Sunday Readings: Love God and Neighbor

The readings for the Thirtieth Sunday in Ordinary Time focus on one...

When to Use AI and When Not To

Drawing on my new book with Trevor Sutton, "Irreplaceable: Humanity, Vocation, and...

Crabs in a Bucket: Why Evangelicalism Won’t Let...

There’s an old saying about crabs in a bucket. You don’t need...

Chapter 10, Elena: Progress

Open and Relational Theology & Social Psychology About this series: This series...

How Should We ‘Use’ Early Christians?

In his prefatory letter to the king of France in his Institutes...

Christa Pike, Human Sacrifice

Tennessee wasn't just trying to kill Pike. It was trying to perform...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube