Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

‘Jesus Calling’ is a way of screening Jesus’ calls

Last updated on: February 24, 2014 at 1:29 pm   by Fred Clark

‘Jesus Calling’ is a way of screening Jesus’ calls 2014-02-24T13:29:10-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When best-selling white evangelical books claim to have a “message from God,” that message always sounds like this: “As you walk along your life-path holding My hand, you are already in touch with the essence of heaven: nearness to Me.”

Somehow it never sounds like this:

Is not this the fast that I choose:
to loose the bonds of injustice,
to undo the thongs of the yoke,
to let the oppressed go free,
and to break every yoke?
Is it not to share your bread with the hungry,
and bring the homeless poor into your house;
when you see the naked, to cover them,
and not to hide yourself from your own kin?
Then your light shall break forth like the dawn,
and your healing shall spring up quickly;
your vindicator shall go before you,
the glory of the Lord shall be your rearguard.
Then you shall call, and the Lord will answer;
you shall cry for help, and he will say, Here I am.

That’s from the book of Isaiah. The author of that book claimed to have a message from God. So did the author of the book of Micah:

He has told you, O mortal, what is good;
and what does the Lord require of you
but to do justice, and to love kindness,
and to walk humbly with your God?

The Gospels, too, contain what they say are messages from God. You can even buy editions of those Gospels that have the message-from-God parts highlighted in red ink.

But those messages from God don’t seem very popular, so I guess we had to keep looking for something more appealing — something nicer.

Ruth Graham (not that one) writes about the controversy surrounding the devotional Jesus Calling — “The Evangelical Best-seller You’ve Never Heard Of.” Written by a reclusive former missionary named Sarah Young, Jesus Calling has sold more than 10 million copies, as well as millions of dollars worth of ancillary tie-ins, for publisher Thomas Nelson.

The gimmick of Young’s book is that it’s written in the first-person voice of Jesus. That hand-holding-Jesus pudding in the first sentence of this post is an example of the kind of thing “Jesus” has to say in the book.

Young practices what she calls “listening prayer,” in which she says she receives messages from God which she then writes down. That’s similar to the process by which her target audience imagines the Bible was written (it’s not how the Bible was written — “inspiration” is not a synonym for dictation — but that’s the popular idea). Over on the Pentecostal/charismatic side of white evangelicalism, the idea of new revelation and new words from God isn’t controversial. But over on the fundie/inerrancy side of white evangelicalism, Young’s claim is perceived as a dangerous threat to the alleged doctrine of sola scriptura.

As Graham writes:

If Jesus Calling has become a cash cow for its author and publisher, it has also, it’s fair to surmise, become something of a headache. Though many evangelicals talk of listening for God’s voice and experiencing his presence, the notion of speaking publicly in the voice of God is questionable at best, heretical at worst. Young’s book has prompted objections from within the mainstream evangelical community, from people who say the book is misleading, or even dangerous. “She puts her thoughts into the first person and then presents that ‘person’ as the resurrected Lord,” David Crump, professor of religion at evangelical Calvin College, told Christianity Today. “I’m tempted to call this blasphemy.”

Thomas Nelson specifically requested I not use the word “channeling” to describe Young’s first-person writing in the voice of Jesus — the word has New Age connotations — but it’s hard to avoid it in describing the book’s rhetorical approach. And on the edges of evangelicalism, where alertness to “New Age” influence runs high, concern has bloomed into outrage.

That last sentence is inaccurate. These folks didn’t read Young’s book and then, as a consequence, become outraged. These folks exist in a perpetual state of outrage. They maintain, nurture and tend this constant outrage with great care, which requires them to be always on the lookout for new pretexts and new targets at which it can be directed.

In this case, though, I’m sympathetic to their concern, if not their outrage. I think there should be a substantial burden of proof for anyone claiming to have received a “message from God.” Any such message should be treated with great skepticism.

If someone claims to be don’t-say-channeling the voice of Jesus, then whatever it is they say Jesus said has to be considered in the context of the other things that Jesus has said. If this new “message from Jesus” tells us to worry about tomorrow, to hate our enemies, to establish financial security, and to shun outcasts, then I think it’s safe to conclude that this message is not from Jesus.

“As you walk along your life-path holding My hand, you are already in touch with the essence of heaven: nearness to Me,” doesn’t strike me as the sort of thing Jesus ever said before or would be likely to say now.

But let’s not single out Young. Most of her evangelical critics have the same problem. Actually, I think their problem is probably worse than hers.

A goofy first-person-Jesus devotional based on “listening prayer” isn’t upsetting or confusing to me. But when other evangelicals turn to the Bible itself seeking a “message from God,” it seems far weirder that they should come away with their own endless variations of walking along their life-paths holding Jesus’ hand. That stuff ain’t in there, yet so many claim to have found it there.

But the really confusing and upsetting part isn’t the stuff they find in there that ain’t there, it’s the stuff that is in there that they somehow never see. “Loose the bonds of injustice … share your bread with the hungry.” “Do justice, love mercy, walk humbly.” Those are messages from God, spelled out right there on the page.

Yet for white evangelicalism, they might as well be written in invisible ink.

“If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.”

evangelicals

Bible

isaiah

Previous Post



February 24, 2014

I wave to the people but the wind just blows 'em down

Next Post



February 24, 2014 Smart people saying smart things


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Skin for skin! All that a man has he will give for something precious. What is it?

Select your answer to see how you score.

His family His life His wealth His soul

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

It's not 'pick and choose.' It's pick a...

slacktivist

Family

Is this the right room for an argument?

slacktivist

Family

Team Everybody sliding into our DMs

slacktivist

Family

Texts of terror? Terrific!

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

How to Make a Decision When You Can't...

Main point: It’s much more valuable to stay close to God so...

Archdiocese Hosts Military Marriage Retreat in Germany

RASTATT, Germany — The transient military lifestyle, with its frequent deployments and...

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

Walking through History

  A new article, written by Jeff Lindsay and Gale L. Pooley,...

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

This is a recovery effort. In 2002, My Big Fat Greek Wedding...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube