Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

The Bible is a large book containing many words and letters

Last updated on: February 2, 2014 at 6:58 pm   by Fred Clark

The Bible is a large book containing many words and letters 2014-02-02T18:58:28-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Bible is a really big book. It’s an anthology, actually, a book of books. The version preferred by American Protestants includes 66 books divided into 1,189 chapters which are, in turn, divided into 31,173 verses. The King James Version, an early and still-popular English translation, has 774,746 words.

For comparison’s sake, if you add together the three books of The Lord of the Rings, plus The Hobbit and The Silmarillion, J.R.R. Tolkien’s epic Middle Earth books include some 706,574 words.

Yet despite Tolkien’s books being filled with wizards and elves and all sorts of splendid magic, most people don’t think his books are themselves magical just because they contain more than 700,000 words. That would be kind of dumb.

But, weirdly, that very same kind-of-dumb assertion is often made about the Bible. It’s really big. It contains more than 700,000 words. So people treat it like magic. People treat those words differently than the words in any other book — even any other really long book.

Consider, for example, the ludicrous-but-best-selling book The Bible Code, by Michael Drosnin. Drosnin set out to find and/or to create patterns by looking at, say, every 50th word. Or the first letters of every 100th word. Or other variations of similar nonsense.

It’s possible to do such a thing with any really big book, but again, no one seems to do this with things like Tolkien. And if anyone did, they’d be ridiculed as an illiterate idiot — justly so and correctly so. People would rightly wonder if this person looking for the “Tolkien Code” understood how to read at all. Yes, all those words and letters in Tolkien have a symbolic meaning — it’s conveyed through language. Tolkien offers sentences that make up paragraphs that make up chapters. These can be read and those who read them find a terrific story. Ignoring that story and ignoring language itself would be, again, just kind of dumb.

But lots of people — including lots of not-dumb people — will do this with the Bible. They treat that book as different, special, magical. They treat that book as though its 774,746 words were not language — as though they were something to decipher rather than to read.

And that’s just weird. It’s not illiterate in the sense of an inability to read, but it is *anti-*literate in the sense that it refuses to allow the text to be read the way we read texts.

The right-wing click-chasing outlet The Christian Post recently both mocked and embodied this weird, magical approach to the Bible in a pair of light-hearted posts by Eric Corpus: “15 Bible Verses Denver Broncos Fans Should Know for the Super Bowl” and “15 Bible Verses Seattle Seahawks Fans Should Know for the Super Bowl.” The “joke” is that hey, look, some of those 31,000+ verses in the Bible say good things about horses and mountains, so Yay, Broncos! And some of those 31,000+ verses mention the sea and/or hawks, so Yay, Seattle! And also too, both teams have people with the same names as some people mentioned in the Bible!

These are pretty silly and not terribly well-done. They reminded me of the old “where in the Bible” puns that every evangelical grows up hearing at some point (“In the big inning,” “Bildad the shoe-height,” “David’s Triumph was heard throughout the land,” etc.), but in a way that made those puns seem sharp by comparison.

Corpus’ items share a comic premise with those old puns: It would be absurd to treat this text, or any text, this way. The joke depends on the validity of the critique. It’s funny because this is not how language works, this is not how texts work or how literacy works. It’s funny to pretend otherwise — to playfully  take words or phrases and twist them into anachronistic or impossible meanings that utterly ignore language and context. But it wouldn’t be funny to really do that in earnest.

And that’s the bigger problem with these little items at The Christian Post. Many of the Post’s readers aren’t in on that joke. The same arbitrary, illiterate approach to the text spoofed by Corpus’ Super Bowl items is the way a lot of the Post’s readers also read the Bible.

As Hemant Mehta wrote, “I don’t think the Christian Post understands the unintentional humor in a couple of articles they posted.”

Yep. But he doesn’t follow through on that thought. Just because The Christian Post doesn’t get the joke doesn’t mean it’s not a joke. It doesn’t mean that Corpus’ silly demonstration of a pro-Broncos hermeneutic isn’t silly.

Again, any sufficiently large text could provide the basis for the same “joke.” It wouldn’t be hard at all to come up with “15 Passages From Tolkien That Say the Denver Broncos Will Win the Super Bowl.” And then also with “15 Passages From Tolkien That Say the Seattle Seahawks Will Win the Super Bowl.”

But it would be really, really odd to read such a silly joke and to conclude from it that Tolkien’s books are therefore ridiculous. And that such silliness proves “Tolkien can be used to justify two completely contradictory ideas” or that “Tolkien is nothing if not self-contradictory.” And that therefore such articles confirm that Tolkien ought to be dismissed as foolishness.

We know that wouldn’t make sense if we said it about Tolkien. And yet we say it about the Bible. Weird. It’s a book, not a magical code. It’s weirdly illiterate to revere it as a magical code and therefore refuse to treat it as a text. And I’m not sure it’s any more literate to dismiss it for its failures as a magical code while also refusing to treat it as a text.

Uncategorized

Bible

hermeneutics

Previous Post



February 2, 2014

Sunday favorites

Next Post



February 3, 2014 7 @ 9: For $20, I'll get you $10


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

"Those who wait on the Lord will renew their strength. They will soar with wings like ____ ..."

Select your answer to see how you score.

Raptors Angels Eagles Hawks

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

It's not 'pick and choose.' It's pick a...

slacktivist

Family

Team Everybody sliding into our DMs

slacktivist

Family

Texts of terror? Terrific!

slacktivist

Family

The phantom menace of biblical chronology

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

When Leaders Don't Practice What They Preach

Our reading this week confronts a troubling contradiction when leaders exhibit a...

Existential Health: Being Available, Engaged and Present

Sometimes we need help carrying reality. And as author Jim Palmer explains,...

The Inversion of Our Holidays

For the first time, a majority of Americans, 53%, consider Halloween to...

Things Go Better with Coke-- Thomas Coke (and...

    These two men were not alone of course, and there...

Americans are Equal, and Racism is Wrong

I was trying not to watch yet another Republican rally in Ohio....

Dom Calmet and the Great Vampire War

As a seasonal Halloween offering, I am here reposting something I originally...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube