Mark Driscoll: If you’re gonna steal, steal better stuff

Last updated on: November 30, 2013 at 4:38 pm by Fred Clark

Mark Driscoll: If you’re gonna steal, steal better stuff 2013-11-30T16:38:21-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“I don’t mind a parasite,” Rick Blaine says to Ugarte in Casablanca. “I object to a cut-rate one.”

The charge that Mark Driscoll plagiarized a big chunk of Peter Jones’ Pagan Lies, Gospel Truth: Can You Tell the Difference? in his own latest book seems both well-substantiated and quite serious. But just as serious is this: The passage in question from Jones’ book is awful.

Here’s part of Jones’ supposed summary of what “Pagans” (i.e., everyone who is not a real, true Christian) believe:

Animals/Humans

What child does not love his pet? Animals hold a special place in our life and the nature in which we live is beautiful and striking. Monists rightly realize that humans often mistreat animals and destroy nature. They offer a salutary program: eliminate the distinctions between the animal, plant and human life, since everything is divine. Witches take the deification of nature to an extreme, by adopting familiars, pets that help them communicate with the spirit world.

Right/Wrong

On the monistic circle, all points are relative. If you realize that your own evil is not really evil, you will know freedom. I once met a long-time church member who discovered A Course in Miracles. In it he read that sin did not exist and that guilt was an illusion. He testified to “walking on air.” Many people classified as sinful (such as pro-abortionists and homosexuals) can find a guilt-free place in society. The spiritual and mystical experience of monism frees you from a guilty conscience because your own evil is good.

There’s more, much more, of the same at the link above to the full passage from Jones. The only thing larger than the vast ignorance Peter Jones displays here is Jones’ serene certainty that he already knows everything he’ll ever need to know and that there’s nothing, ever, that he might need to learn from or about the real people he’s caricaturing and dismissing.

Jones comes across, in other words, as kind of a dick — spared from complete and total dickhood only by the pity that accompanies the suspicion that he’s perhaps just not very bright. Yet whether or not he fully understands what he’s writing — which, itself, seems to be a banal rehashing of thrice-copied ideas half-grasped from some fourth-rate imitation Francis Schaeffer* tract he never cites either, but which he perceived as “deep” because it used the word “worldview” — doesn’t change the fact that Jones is, in fact and in deed, being a huge jerk. He’s slandering people he can’t be bothered to understand. He’s slandering people he hasn’t bothered to read or to listen to.

That’s a sin. Peter Jones seems to feel free to sin in this way because he’s convinced himself that his own evil is not really evil and thus he has come to find what he imagines is his guilt-free place in society. The defective, dormant conscience he attributes to all these Other People in his book initially struck me as unreal, yet Jones himself illustrates that it is a possibility.

Or maybe Jones feels free to sin in this way because “Pagans” and outsiders are fair game and RTCs are allowed to display their virtue by lying about such people with impunity. Whatever. It’s wrong. It’s bad. Christians need to stop writing books like that and to stop reading them.

Driscoll seems to have borrowed heavily from those very paragraphs. But if he had cited Jones in his book, he would have been doing something Jones himself never does — citing others by name and referencing actual published words. Driscoll’s plagiarism, in other words, seems to consist of cloning Jones’ strawman. That’s bad, but Jones’ misattribution strikes me as a more malicious problem than Driscoll’s lazy lack of attribution.

Jones’ passage is ignorantly dismissive and dismissively ignorant. It wasn’t written to help readers understand, only to convince those readers to reject others by misrepresenting them. Jones’ book is not worth reading, let alone plagiarizing.

So, yes, if Driscoll plagiarized this passage, then he’s got a plagiarism problem. But he’s also got a big problem in terms of the source material he regards as worth plagiarizing. If you’re going to steal, steal the good stuff.**

– – – – – – – – – – – – –

* I was going to use that great line here about Schaeffer being a “dumb person’s idea of a smart person,” but since this is post partly about plagiarism, and since I’m not sure who first said that, I wouldn’t want to quote it without proper citation. James Fallows has traced the line back to at least 1936, when Emily Bowen described Aldous Huxley as a “perpetual clever nephew who can be relied on to flutter the lunch-party. … He is at once the truly clever person and the stupid person’s idea of the clever person.”

** Woody Allen said, “It you’re going to steal, steal from the best.” But Woody himself said that line was from Martha Graham.

evangelicals

tribalism

Previous Post

November 30, 2013

Today is the feast day of St. Mark Twain

Next Post

December 1, 2013 4 years ago: The fatuous foolishness of 'The Manhattan Declaration'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What four things does the Pale Horse in Revelations bring upon the earth?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Storms, earthquakes, floods, and darkness Wrath, power, redemption, and judgment Sword, famine, plague, and wild beasts Silence, fire, blood, and pestilence