Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Heaven Is for Doppelgangers: You will be replaced in the afterlife

Heaven Is for Doppelgangers: You will be replaced in the afterlife

Last updated on: November 17, 2013 at 8:20 pm by Fred Clark

Heaven Is for Doppelgangers: You will be replaced in the afterlife 2013-11-17T20:20:14-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Stories have rules, even stories about the great beyond. That’s why goofy stories like It’s a Wonderful Life, or Heaven Can Wait, or Defending Your Life can still work. They may suggest ridiculous rules about how the afterlife works, but they abide by the rules they establish, and so we can follow them, enjoy them, and even learn from them.

One problem with the best-selling book Heaven Is for Real — now a major motion picture — is that it violates its own rules. Todd Burpo’s “memoir” follows the near-death experience of his very young son, who was not quite 4 years old when he flatlined and was broad brought back by doctors.

Here, again, is the trailer for the film, in which Greg Kinnear plays the role of Todd Burpo:

Burpo claims that his son’s experience confirms Plato’s theories about the migration of souls. While the boy’s body lay on the hospital bed, Burpo says, his soul went to Heaven where he embraced long-dead family members and sat on Jesus lap atop a rainbow-colored horse.

That multi-colored horsey is a reflection of the central theme of this story, which is that we’re getting a glimpse of Heaven through the eyes of a child. Burpo’s son visited Heaven as a 4-year-old child, and so the description of Heaven he provides us is a description of what that paradise looks like to a 4-year-old child.

“Come play with us, Colton.”

Here, then, is a central rule of this story: We arrive in “Heaven” at whatever age we are when we died. Since young Colton Burpo was a toddler when he briefly died, his time in Heaven was spent there as a toddler.

Yet this rule isn’t quite so simple. Burpo also says his son told him of meeting his great-grandfather in Heaven, but shown a picture of his father’s grandfather, the boy doesn’t recognize him. “In Heaven,” he says, “everybody’s young.” Shown another picture later, of his great-grandfather as a young adult, the boy says, “That’s him. That’s Pop.”

So Pop, who lived to be an old man before he died, is a healthy, 30-ish man in Heaven. Our rule is trickier than it first seemed. Apparently, in the Heaven of this story, the souls of the departed are reincarnated into the bodies they once had in the prime of life. For the great-grandfather, that means being restored to his younger self. But for young Colton it still meant being in Heaven as a toddler, which was as much of a prime of life as he had yet attained before his thankfully brief brush with death.

But that can’t be the rule either, because this story also tells us about another deceased relative of the family that the boy meets in “Heaven.” Here’s how that encounter is described in the movie:

Mom: (to little boy) Honey, who told you I had a baby die in my tummy?

Little Boy: In Heaven, this little girl came up to me, and she told me she died in your tummy.

Burpo presents this as a piece of proof that the story of his son’s visit to Heaven is true. The young boy couldn’t possibly have known about the miscarriage his mother had years before he was born, yet he learned of it from the “little girl” he met in Heaven who told him she died in his mommy’s tummy. This is proof that young Colton really must have been in Heaven. (And also, of course, proof that Platonic human personhood begins at conception and that therefore everyone must always vote Republican forever.)

But what are we to make of this encounter?

We should note, first, the statistical implausibility of Colton having only one such heavenly “sister.” More than half of all fertilized eggs are lost in the earliest stages of pregnancy, so just as the Burpo’s suffered a later miscarriage that their son never knew about, so too they almost certainly must have had one or more earlier miscarriages that even they never knew about. Again, if every zygote and embryo is a fully human person who goes to Heaven when they die, then the overwhelming majority of people in Heaven are people who were never born.

But why was this unborn sister of Colton’s a “little girl” in Heaven? She was never a little girl here on Earth.

This reincarnation at a different age isn’t like what happened to “Pop.” Pop died as an old man, but in Heaven is restored to the full youth and health he previously enjoyed when he actually lived as an actual young adult. “In Heaven, everybody’s young” works as a rule for those who ever attained youth — it’s something like H.G. Wells’ “four dimensional portrait” in The Time Machine:

Here is a portrait of a man at 8 years old, another at 15, another at 17, another at 23, and so on. All these are evidently sections, as it were, Three-Dimensional representations of his Four-Dimensioned being, which is a fixed and unalterable thing.

The youthful Pop is thus a kind of Platonic ideal (in more than one sense) of the great-grandfather as a “four-dimensioned being.”

But this sister is a different matter. We cannot see a portrait of her “at 8 years old, another at 15, another at 17, another at 23, and so on” because she never was 23, or 17, or 15, or 8. She never was 5 or 4 or 3 or 2 or 1. A portrait of her at 23 could not be a portrait of her any more than I could show you a photograph of John F. Kennedy at age 70. A portrait of this sister as a “little girl” could not really be a portrait of her, only an invention of something somewhat like her, offered instead of her.

This “little girl” is not Colton’s sister. His sister died before her first breath. This “little girl” in Heaven cannot be her.

It says it is her, though. It says it is there as her, in her place. But it is something else. Something else instead of her.

To avert the immensely creepy implications of this heavenly doppelganger posing as Colton’s sister Burpo waves the God wand and appeals to a kind of deus ex machina to patch over this disturbing dark doorway in the plot of his story. God is all-knowing and all-powerful, so God is therefore capable of knowing exactly what sort of “little girl” this unborn sibling would have grown to become and is capable of welcoming her into Heaven as that little girl she never was.

But this won’t do, for at least two reasons.

First, if this “little girl” is meant to represent the grown person this pregnancy “would have” become, then why a little girl and not, say, a 30-ish accountant? The answer cannot be that it’s because she never lived to become a 30-ish accountant, because she never lived to become a little girl, either.

If we are to appeal to infinite knowledge of all possible alternative realities in order to create a walking, talking, wholly aware self to be this sister’s heavenly reality, then why would that reality be limited to childhood? I suppose one explanation is that the sibling who died “in mommy’s tummy” would have otherwise gone on to live a happy life as her daughter before, ultimately, dying tragically as a little girl years before she ever had the chance to become the 30-year-old accountant she might otherwise have become. And thus, in “Heaven,” this entity is magically granted the form of the “little girl” she never actually was, rather than the form of the 30-something accountant she never actually was, or the form of the 53-year-old marathon runner she never actually was (or the form of the Hell-bound 25-year-old Satan-worshipper she never actually was either).

But that explanation contradicts the whole thrust of this story, which seems intended to offer a shallow measure of consolation. Such consolation is undermined by the idea that the unborn “children” awaiting us in Heaven would, at best, have died from something else before high school anyway.

A second problem with this magical-seeming appeal to God’s infinite knowledge of alternative futures is the matter of Colton himself. He appeared in Heaven at the age of 3 years and 10 months old because that was the age at which he (almost and/or briefly) died. The same divine infinite knowledge of potential alternative futures that produces the “little girl” his “sister” might otherwise have become was apparently unable to conceive of an alternative possible future in which Colton grew to become a healthy 14-year-old boy. That’s an odd oversight on the part of our deus ex machina, considering that Colton has, in fact, gone on to live and to grow into precisely that healthy 14-year-old boy (albeit one who will likely require years of therapy to overcome his father’s exploitation of this story and to avoid the sad Marjoe-Gortner-esque trail his parents have laid out for him).

This heavenly “little girl” pushes Burpo’s story out of the realm of pious platitudes he intended to explore and into the realm of science fiction. Her presence means we’re not just talking about life after death, but about time travel, alternate universes, a multiverse of multiple dimensions and the like.

It’s either that, or this is a deeply unnerving horror story. If you don’t want to follow this deep into the weeds of quantum gobbledygook and Schrodinger’s sister, then our only alternative is to go back and look through the dark doorway that Todd Burpo has opened for us. There we will see a glimpse of something that looks like Heaven, and it is filled with people who look like us.

But they are not us. They are the things that will replace us — that things that “Heaven” will welcome instead of us.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 17, 2013

Sunday favorites

Next Post

November 18, 2013 2 years ago: Dueling dogma isn't dialogue

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus do at the Last Supper?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Wrote in the sand Washed the floor Broke bread and shared wine Built an altar