Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
On ‘leadership’ and men, men, men, men, manly men, men, men …

On ‘leadership’ and men, men, men, men, manly men, men, men …

Last updated on: November 13, 2013 at 6:43 pm by Fred Clark

On ‘leadership’ and men, men, men, men, manly men, men, men … 2013-11-13T18:43:10-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In keeping with today’s topic of religious TV theme songs, here’s the theme song for the not-at-all presumptuously titled “Leadership Network“:

The Leadership Network is hosting a conference on leadership for leaders, featuring lots of leading leaders talking about leadership. (Because that’s how that works.)

The conference, called “The Nines,” features more than 100 leading speakers. Almost six of them are women.

Well, almost five, actually.

OK, four. Four of them are women. Maybe three. But there are at least three women out of the more than 100 speakers at this event.

That’s not a joke. Well, that is a joke — it’s laughable — but the folks at the Leadership Network don’t seem to understand why, in 2013, they’ve made themselves a laughingstock.

And when Rachel Held Evans pointed out that they’d dug themselves into a rather ridiculous looking hole, conference organizer Todd Rhoades grabbed his shovel and started digging furiously.

“More than 100 speakers and only four of them are women. This is not what the church looks like,” Evans wrote on Twitter.

The Leadership Network.

Rhoades wouldn’t be dumb enough to respond defensively by blaming women for not aggressively pursuing the opportunity to speak at his conference, would he?

Yes, yes he would.

“We asked quite a few women that didn’t respond to our speaker invites @rachelheldevans // just in case you wanted to ask :)” he responded, just in case you wanted to ask if a guy hosting a conference with more than a 9-to-1 male-to-female ratio was patronizing toward women.

But Rhoades wasn’t done. He kept digging.

“Oh look. A woman. :)” he tweeted.

And then followed that up with, “A female leader adds new perspective on important female specific topics such as pregnancy, abortion, and marriage.”

Sensing that their boy was doing further damage to the bro-tastic reputation of the conference, the father figures of this “leadership” movement stepped in with the most patronizingly paternalistic pater noster I have ever seen, cloaking themselves in the pious garments of “unity” while simultaneously dismissing Evans’ concerns as a “meltdown” from some kind of feminist “industry” clashing with his “ministry.”

Not cool, bro. Kinda douchey, dude. (Is that how “leaders” talk? I was never in that frat, so I’m not sure.)

That prayer for “unity” somehow failed to convince Rhoades to pull his foot from his mouth and for God’s sake just stop talking.

Rhoades explained to CT why the fifth Nines event has a lower ratio of women speakers than past years.

Rhoades said that speaker invitations are driven by each year’s theme. Given that this year’s focus was “what’s working in churches,” The Nines focused on inviting senior pastors. “No matter what your view is on women in leadership, this is still a largely male role in churches, whether that is good or bad,” said Rhoades. “We [at Leadership Network] work with a lot of great women leaders. Unfortunately, not very many are lead pastors.”

It’s almost like he’s reading flashcards from a deck labeled The Worst Things To Say: Lowlights From Five Decades of Disastrous, Disingenuous and Destructive Responses From the Old Boy’s Network.

Whether that is good or bad.

These people purport to be experts on “Leadership.” They charge others for conferences on the subject. They sell their “leadership” advice in the form of books, magazines and VHS tapes. (I’m assuming they still do VHS, because everything else about them is still stuck ca. 1983.)

Shouldn’t experts on “leadership” be aware that this entire debacle is just a re-enactment of an incredibly predictable, easily avoidable script that’s been replaying for decades? Shouldn’t they be aware of how many “leaders” have tumbled from their pedestals for just this kind of clueless, patronizing behavior?

I have no idea what the literature in the field of “leadership studies” looks like, but I’m fairly sure that somewhere in there must be something that warns against hosting a conference touting “leadership” that features only a handful of women out of more than 100 speakers. And somewhere else in there must be something that warns against blaming women for that disparity. Or against belittling women as prone to emotional “melt-downs.” Or against suggesting that women are nothing more than wombs with legs, only capable of speaking to “female specific topics such as pregnancy.”

Yet clearly, if you’re looking for leadership in how to organize a meaningful conference, or how to respect others, or how to respond to criticism, you won’t find any such leadership from the Leadership Network. What you’ll find instead is a clown show that looks like an HR training video on what not to do if you want to avoid getting sued for creating a hostile workplace environment. Disrespect, ineptitude and an evident lack of awareness of conversations that have been going on for years and years do not heighten my regard for these folks’ claims to “leadership” expertise.

That Christianity Today piece quoted above isn’t much better. The headline — “The Nines Explains Why So Few Women Are Among 100-Plus Speakers” — seems to accept and to bless Rhoades’ making-things-worse excuses as a legitimate “explanation” that CT finds satisfactory and that ought to also satisfy those uppity women having a meltdown.

But the good news is that CT has to contend with those women. The article quotes Rachel Held Evans and it quotes Sarah Bessey. Who? say the leading leaders of the Leadership Network. And they may never understand the answer to that question.

Who are these women? They’re leaders. I don’t call them that because they’re proclaiming themselves to be leaders, or because they’re demanding that others follow them, or because they’re trying to sell me expert advice on leadership.

I call them that because that’s actually what they’re doing — leading.

evangelicals

church

gender

Previous Post

November 13, 2013

Haiti should not be the model for America's future

Next Post

November 14, 2013 2 years ago: The American evangelical persecution complex (continued … and continued and continued …)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the correct sequence of the fruit of the Spirit as listed in Galatians?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joy, love, peace, goodness, kindness, faithfulness, forbearance, gentleness, self-control Love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control Love, joy, peace, kindness, goodness, forbearance, faithfulness, self-control, gentleness Love, peace, joy, kindness, forbearance, faithfulness, goodness, self-control, gentleness