7 things @ 11 o’clock (7.17)

Last updated on: July 17, 2013 at 11:01 am by Fred Clark

7 things @ 11 o’clock (7.17) 2013-07-16T20:46:33-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

1. It’s a Bad Thing that Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., is lying about his longstanding opposition to the Violence Against Women Act. But it is a Good Thing that Sen. Mitch McConnell feels it is necessary to lie about his opposition to the Violence Against Women Act.

2. Brian Ervin of Urban Tulsa weekly uses the allegations against the heirs of Oral Roberts as a hook for a long look at the finances of more typical Christian pastors and local churches. “Lifestyles of the Rich Evangelists” is the attention-grabbing headline, but the subhed tells the real story, “an inventory of the way some churches handle fiduciary responsibility.” It’s a story of checks and balances, accountability structures, and used Honda Accords. A good reminder that (alleged) swindlers like Robert Roberts or the prosperity hucksters of Preachers of L.A. are the exception, not the rule.

3. As a Pennsylvanian, I am represented in the U.S. Senate by Bob Casey and Pat Toomey. That’s kind of depressing. But as an American wage-earner, I’m also represented in the U.S. Senate by Elizabeth Warren — and I’m very pleased by that. One of Sen. Warren’s current battles is an attempt to reinstate the Glass-Steagall banking regulations originally passed as part of the New Deal. I’d summarize what that entails for you, except that I couldn’t do as good a job of it as Sen. Warren does herself in the CNBC video posted yesterday by Talking Points Memo.

After being forced to surrender the argument that this re-regulation of the big banks was unnecessary, the hosts took a different tack, arguing that Warren’s bill was politically impossible. Her response to that is pretty terrific, so go watch the video, but what struck me here was the host’s attempt to compare Warren’s proposal to the 37+ meaningless votes in the House of Representatives to “repeal” Obamacare. That’s apples and oranges. There’s a big difference between the tea party’s posturing through hollow symbolic gestures that aren’t expected or intended to result in actual policy and Sen. Warren’s long-shot, uphill proposal that she is committed to seeing enacted (re-enacted) as law. She’s not pushing this bill to provide a slogan for her next 30-second TV ad. She’s pushing this bill because she thinks it’s good policy.

4. Speaking of long-shot, uphill, worthwhile efforts against entrenched powerful interests … here’s the latest news from my one-time employer, the Evangelical Environmental Network: “Evangelical Scientists Issue Faith-Based Call for Congress to Address Climate Change.”

Last week, 200 self-identified evangelical scientists from secular and religious universities sent a letter to the U.S. Congress calling for legislation to reduce carbon emissions and protect the environment. The signatories, all of whom hold master’s or doctorate degrees in scientific fields, cited the Biblical teachings of charity and compassion for the poor and the scientific evidence of increased extreme weather events to make the case for climate legislation.

The scientific case they make is overwhelming. The biblical case they make is unassailable. I’m not sure that will matter, because insufficient scientific evidence and insufficient biblical understanding are not the basis for Congress’ inaction on climate change any more than they are the basis for the climate-change denialism embraced by millions of non-scientist white evangelicals. The climate denialists in Congress and in the church are not motivated by ignorance or by a lack of compelling argument, so supplying more information and better arguments isn’t likely to change their position. As Garrison and Douglass both often said, “it is not light that is needed.” Ignorance of the scientific consensus or of the biblical teaching is not the problem.

EEN’s Jim Ball seems to recognize this, realizing that the substance of the letter is less likely to matter than the institutional authority wielded by its signatories. “To have evangelical scientists, people of faith, saying to the evangelical community that you can trust this science is quite important,” Ball said. “It’s all a matter of trust.”

This is the gatekeeper epistemology of the evangelical subculture, which is less concerned with the question of what we are able to know than with the question of what we are allowed to know. Reason, evidence and sound exegesis don’t matter nearly as much as appeals to authority. And I’m afraid that for both Congress and for “mainstream” white evangelicals, the authority of John Boehner, James Inhofe and Mitch McConnell trumps the authority of Wheaton, Calvin, Messiah, Eastern, Gordon and all the other respectable evangelical colleges and universities represented by the signatories of EEN’s letter. The effect, I’m afraid, will not be to make climate science more credible, but to further erode the tribal legitimacy of these pointy-headed intellectual academic institutions.

Very Much Related: The flabbergasted, profane frustration expressed in this Louis CK routine captures a big part of why I no longer work for the Evangelical Environmental Network (although I wish them every success, however unlikely).

5. And speaking of ideological blindness leading to a rejection of science … “Generally at odds with solid medical evidence.” Ouch.

North Dakota already has spent more than $52,000 defending the 2011 state law, according to records obtained by the Associated Press. Records show that Dr. Donna Harrison, the president the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, has billed the state more than $49,000 to act as an expert witness.

In his ruling Monday, [East Central Judge Wickham] Corwin was highly critical of Harrison, saying her “opinions lack scientific support, tend to be based on unsubstantiated concerns and are generally at odds with solid medical evidence.”

But who needs science or evidence when you can bill taxpayers $49,000 because Republican Jesus?

6. Darrell Dow shares video of the debut of a new song at a fundamentalist church. It’s got a good beat and you can dance to it — or, rather, you could if dancing were allowed at this church. “I salute their three-chord musicality and cringe at their theology,” Dow writes. “At least they seem like they’re having fun.”

The song also serves as an excellent illustration of how Rapture-mania serves the tribe’s need to draw lines separating itself from the world around them — from people who may otherwise be morally and ethically indistinguishable from real, true Christians:

Only a blood-bought, born-again child of God will surely make it through
Better get Rapture ready, don’t be left I’m telling you …

And that’s a good excuse to once again plug for Daniel Radosh’s generous, entertaining and insightful book Rapture Ready!: Adventures in the Parallel Universe of Christian Pop Culture.

7. “Volturnus” would be an excellent name for Neptune’s 14th moon.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 17, 2013

6 years ago: Origins of the God Gap

Next Post

July 17, 2013 Tricks and truth: Play at debate, but avoid the shut-eye

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What year did the Great Schism occur, splitting the Eastern and Western churches?

Select your answer to see how you score.

1054 AD 1517 AD 325 AD 500 AD