Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

Climate change is both a hoax and a sign of the End Times

Last updated on: December 14, 2012 at 12:07 pm   by Fred Clark

Climate change is both a hoax and a sign of the End Times 2012-12-14T12:07:07-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Susie Madrak tells us about Sen. James Inhofe’s latest climate-change-denial press conference. This time the Oklahoma Republican brought along some friends, including an unhinged British Lord, Christopher Monckton, and Cathie Adams, President of the Texas Eagle Forum.

Adams, also a former chair of the Texas GOP, believes that climate change is part of the Antichrist’s plot to create one world government.

Yes, really. If that seems like it’s something right out of the Left Behind novels, that’s because it comes right out of the Left Behind novels.

But even though Adams is a devout disciple of Tim LaHaye’s Bircher eschatology, she doesn’t quite seem to understand it. In a 1999 newsletter, Adams wrote:

The Bible tells us that in the end times there will be a world government headed by a world leader, called the anti-Christ, who will profess a world religion, but did you ever think you would live in the day when these things would come into being? That is exactly what the United Nations is doing behind the backs of most Americans.

That’s all boilerplate “Bible prophecy” lingo, except for that weird rhetorical question — “did you ever think you would live in the day when these things would come into being?”

That’s the whole point of this “Bible prophecy” nonsense, to believe that this generation uniquely lives in the day when these things are coming into being. There has never been a single “prophecy” preacher or Rapture enthusiast who taught that this was a prophecy for some distant future generation.

Darby was certain the Rapture would happen in his lifetime. Scofield and Ironside were certain the Rapture  would happen in their lifetime. And when Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye first started writing about the Rapture, neither one of them said there was any chance at all that they and the world would still be around to be talking about it in 2012.

These folks insist that the Rapture and the End of the World are prophesied to occur in our lifetime. That’s what makes us special. It means that the Bible was written mainly for and about us — for and about the 20th 21st-century white Americans in whose special lifetimes these prophecies were ordained by God to occur. John of Patmos wasn’t really writing to the seven first-century churches he names in the book of Revelation — he was writing to us, and really only to us.

In their view, the Bible is mainly about prophecy. And that prophecy is mainly about events expected to occur in our lifetimes. That makes us God’s most-special special-est people of all.

Even more special than that, actually, because as students of the secrets of Bible prophecy, we alone are the enlightened ones who possess the Gnostic truths of the initiates.

That’s the appeal of the whole bizarre realm of LaHaye-style “Bible prophecy.” And that’s why more than a third of Americans find it appealing, as a Public Religion Research Institute poll released yesterday shows:

More than a third of Americans believe the severity of recent natural disasters is evidence that we are in the “end times” described in the New Testament — a period of turmoil preceding Jesus’ Second Coming and the end of the world.

“There is a significant proportion of Americans who see these phenomena through a theological lens,” said Daniel Cox, research director at the Public Religion Research Institute, which released a poll on religion and climate change on Thursday (Dec. 13) in partnership with Religion News Service.

“It’s hardly a fringe belief. It’s nearly four in 10 Americans who are embracing this,” Cox said.

The conviction is particularly strong among white evangelical Protestants (65 percent).

So two-thirds of white evangelical Americans believe that they’re living in the most-special special-est times of God’s most-special special-est people.

This view helps to explain white evangelical support for Inhofe’s climate denialism and for his party’s climate do-nothing-ism. These folks believe that God is bringing about the end of the world, and that efforts to address the disasters coming from climate change are part of the Antichrist’s Satanic plot.

But don’t worry, that’s just a “fringe” belief. Only 65 percent of white evangelicals think this way.

* * * * * * * * *

Cathie Adams’ Texas Eagle Forum is part of the national Eagle Forum, founded and still led by Phyllis Schlafly.

Her son Roger is now a prominent spokesman for the group. Here (via Brian Tashman) is Roger Schlafly writing about the recent election at the Eagle Forum Blog:

America was founded by WASPs — White Anglo-Saxon Protestants. They had nuclear families, attended church, and believed in the Protestant work ethic. Republicans are seen as believing in traditional American values.

Democrats campaign largely by badmouthing traditional American values, and convincing various demographic groups that they are outside the Republican base, and hence better off voting Democrat. So non-whites, non-Christians, and non-marrieds vote Democrat out of group identifications. That is, they see it as being in their group interests to tear down traditional American culture.

Democrats never persuade voters based on reason or logic. They gain voters by increasing government dependence and by promoting changes to immigration policy. …

But please, please don’t accuse him of being a bigot. And please don’t infer from those words that the righteous, godly white evangelicals of the Eagle Forum are any sort of racists.

After all, Schlafly is not saying that he hates “non-whites” and “non-Christians.” He’s just saying that they’re inferior, dependent parasites who are destroying white America.

But again, that’s just a fringe opinion.

evangelicals

environment

Left Behind

religious right

Previous Post



December 14, 2012

Christmas love songs

Next Post



December 14, 2012 SSDD: If the evangelical mainstream wants me to view the religious right as marginal, then they should do more to marginalize the religious right


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who prophesied about a locust plague and called for national repentance?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Micah Amos Daniel Joel

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

Is this the right room for an argument?

slacktivist

Family

The Amish are not 'Evangelicals.' They're Amish.

slacktivist

Family

The lumpers, the splitters, and me

slacktivist

Family

'Is it right on red or left on...

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Emotion in Early Christianity by Andrew Crislip

Andrew Crislip’s Emotion in Early Christianity examines an often overlooked dimension of...

16 Spiritual Touchstones for a More Grounded Life

  After decades of spiritual study, here are 16 principles I try...

Catholic Evangelization: Sharing Your Faith Every Day

Welcome back to the Graceful Awakening mini-series called, “From Faith to Mission.” ...

The Pillar of the Boatmen: the Ancient Monument...

The Pillar of the Boatmen is a Romano-Gaulish sculpture that dates from...

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

In one sense walking into Westminster Abbey is like walking down the...

'Super Scam Me' Exposes AI Jon Bon Jovi...

Leslie Pickett believed she was in a relationship with Jon Bon Jovi....

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube