Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
TFTM: The Antichrist’s inbox

TFTM: The Antichrist’s inbox

Last updated on: February 13, 2012 at 4:10 pm by Fred Clark

TFTM: The Antichrist’s inbox 2012-02-13T16:10:56-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Left Behind II: Tribulation Force, Part 6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jor3mB-iy-Q

Morning dawns at New Hope Village Church and the establishing shot reminds us of the wanton chaos of a world unleavened by the civilizing presence of real, true Christians.

Trash, furniture and yet more bicycles are strewn across the lawn of the church. (What is it with abandoned bicycles lying all over everywhere in this movie? I’m the sort of liberal Christian that this story insists will be among those left behind, but I’ve never been secretly inclined to toss bicycles about the sidewalk or onto the the lawns of fundamentalist churches. I don’t know for sure how I’d respond if I awoke tomorrow to learn that every RTC had been whisked away by the Rapture, but I’m fairly certain I wouldn’t be thinking, “At last, those annoying Christians are finally gone! Now I can finally start scattering bicycles everywhere, bwa-ha-ha-ha!“)

A toppled newspaper box bears a headline from the day of the Event, suggesting that this disarray has been there, untouched, for more than a week. Why hasn’t Bruce arranged to have this cleaned up by now? I appreciate that the Tribulation Force regards itself as having a vitally important mission — “nothing less than to stand and fight the enemies of God during the seven most chaotic years the planet will ever see,” as the back cover of the book says. But that’s no excuse for allowing such a mess to fester on the lawn of their headquarters. Seriously, the four of them could have this cleaned up in less than an hour. The earthquakes, rivers of blood, fiery hail and demon locusts will be enough of a challenge on their own without compounding the problem by letting trash pile up on the church lawn.

Inside the church, the Trib Force’s executive committee of the whole is having yet another discussion about Buck’s plan to interview the Two Witnesses in Jerusalem. Whenever we see the four of them gathered together like this we realize yet again that we’re seeing three actors and a celebrity. Kirk Cameron has a different agenda here than the others have and it takes us out of the story. Brad Johnson, Clarence Gilyard and Janaya Stephens are trying to show us a story. Cameron is trying to preach us a sermon. He seems perpetually on the verge of turning to the camera to say, “I’m Kirk Cameron, and I approve this message.”

One of my favorite lines from Shakespeare in Love repeats an old theater joke. The actor cast to play the nurse in what will become Romeo and Juliet is asked what the play is about. “It’s about this nurse …” he says. That sums up the difference between what Cameron and Johnson are doing in this movie. If you asked Johnson what the movie was about, he’d have told you that it was about a pilot humbled by the sudden loss of his wife and son. If you asked Kirk Cameron what the movie was about, he’d tell you what he thinks the Bible says about the End Times and the Rapture and the Great Tribulation. He would never say, “It’s about this reporter …,” and so when we see him there on the screen we never see that reporter.

“The Antichrist has powers we may not even be able to comprehend,” Bruce warns.

It’s an apt warning, because the Antichrist of this movie is, indeed, very hard to comprehend. Nicolae Carpathia just doesn’t make much sense as a character.

We’re told who Nicolae is, or at least what he is, but we can’t reconcile that with what we see him doing. What he does conflicts with what he wants. It conflicts with what he’s supposed to want given that he’s the Antichrist. But then that would probably be true no matter what he did, because it’s impossible to imagine anyone wanting what he wants. Why would the Antichrist want to be the Antichrist? Why would he agree to that? And specifically, why would this Antichrist agree to be the Antichrist?

Jerry Jenkins and Tim LaHaye never address that in the books except by authorial fiat. They just assert that Nicolae wants bad things because he’s a bad person and that he wants arbitrarily strange things because that’s what the prophecies say he will want. That’s the Jenkins Method: Tell, don’t show. But that’s not an option on the screen. In a movie everything has to be shown, and that presents a big problem for director Bill Corcoran, screenwriters John Patus and Paul Lalonde, and most of all for actor Gordon Currie. Each struggles with the impossibility of conveying who Nicolae is as a person, what he wants, how what he does relates to what he wants, and why it is that anyone might possibly want or do any of what he wants and does.

The incoherence of Nicolae’s character isn’t entirely Jerry Jenkins’ fault. He had to start with the premillennial dispensationalist chimera cobbled together from various unrelated scripture passages. The Antichrist is a figure stitched together from pieces of the Beast of Revelation, of Pharaoh and Nebuchadnezzar, of Nero and Domitian, of Ahab and Omri, and of every generic warning against oppressors, liars, evildoers and tyrants in the Bible. Take that creature and add on several more layers of John Birch Society paranoia plus all the ways the identity of the Antichrist has been tweaked and adapted over the years in order to make various writers’ preferred candidates seem more likely. What you end up with isn’t a consistent, recognizable character.

Jenkins can make that character do all the things that LaHaye’s supposed prophecies supposedly prophesy he will do, but there’s no way he could have made all those things seem like the reasonable, human choices of a reasonable, human character. By never even trying to show us Nicolae as an actual human character, Jenkins glosses over the way the Antichrist, as a human figure, exposes the weird implausibility of LaHaye’s prophetic scheme. LaHaye’s prophecies insist that in the last days, a man will arise and do strange and puzzling things for no apparent reason. And everyone will rush to follow that man, also for no apparent reason.

I can’t help but pity Currie in all of this. He’s the one tasked with trying to show us why Nicolae might credibly be doing all of the strange things he’s prophesied to do. In some scenes he seems to surrender to the impossibility of that, camping it up like he’s in an old Vincent Price movie. In other scenes, though, I think he’s really trying. I think he’s approaching the role as though this movie were “about this Antichrist …” But the character of Nicolae Carpathia ultimately just doesn’t make enough sense for him to show us such a story.

I feel bad for Gordon Currie. His first real professional gig was on 21 Jump Street, so right out of the gate he was working with Johnny Depp. For his first two years as a struggling actor in Los Angeles, he shared a cheap apartment with a roommate named Brad Pitt. Pitt and Depp have both gone on to earn multiple Academy Award nominations and to be named People magazine’s “Sexiest Man Alive” two times apiece while Currie’s still stuck in sporadic roles on Canadian television and in wretched projects like this*.*

Note to Brad Pitt: On the extremely slim chance that you somehow read this someday, how about throwing a bone to your old roomie for old times’ sake? If the gang gets back together for Ocean’s Fourteen, maybe you could find room somewhere for another sidekick. You’ve been deservedly blessed to have your own career soar upwards since the days in which you appeared on Growing Pains. Have mercy on your poor former roommate who seems to have plateaued alongside Kirk Cameron. (P.S. Thank you for Moneyball, that was terrific. And thank you for the work you’re doing in New Orleans.)

In the next scene, we see Nicolae at the Global News Network headquarters, talking with Steve Plank. Currie and the writers here seem to take slightly different angles in trying to flesh out the character of the Antichrist. “Divided religions mean a divided world,” he says, offering more of a rationale for the idea of a one-world religion than is ever suggested in the book.

“This is not a dictatorship,” he says. I think Currie intends him to mean it. The writers, I think, intended that line to be duplicitous and hypocritical — something Nicolae would say with a malicious twinkle in his eye. But Currie plays it straight. That suggests what seems to me to be the most interesting choice — to present Nicolae Carpathia as an idealist who is so certain of his own good intentions that he does not worry about his capacity to wield absolute power unchecked by anything except his own benevolence. That could be the stuff of tragedy — a story worth telling.

Unfortunately, the writers and the director seem intent on preventing that option in this story.

“Tolerance, harmony and peace,” Currie says, as though this is what Nicolae truly dreams of bringing about. But that interpretation is stymied by a script filled with evangelicalese — the jargon of American Christians in which “tolerance” is always regarded with disdain as an expression of hostility to the One True Faith.

In a big departure from the book, we see real-life mega-church pastor T.D. Jakes on the TV monitor in his role as the Rev. Vernon Billings. GNN appears to be broadcasting Billings’ In Case Of Rapture video — the video the Trib Force members watched in the books, in which the now-raptured pastor predicts the Event with stunning accuracy and foretells precisely what will unfold afterward.

Billings’ video is probably the most powerful piece of evidence the Trib Force has, and their best weapon for advancing their goals. But Buck had nothing to do with this broadcast of the tape. Like the Buck Williams of the first two novels and the first year and a half of the Great Tribulation, Cam-Cam hasn’t even thought about trying to get that tape on the air.

Nicolae shuts down the broadcast. “How does this create harmony?” he asks. For the writers, that’s his excuse. For Currie, that’s his reason.

We have a brief scene of aggressive cuteness as Buck and Chloe say goodbye at the airport. It includes a cookie reference, but thankfully opts not to faithfully stick to the book’s entire cookie subplot. Whew.

Next thing you know we’re in the air aboard Global Community One, scaled down to the more modest realities of this small-budget film. There seem to be only six people aboard the plane: Rayford, a copilot, Buck, Nicolae, Steve and Hattie, who despite her recent career-change apparently still has to serve as a flight attendant whenever her new boyfriend flies.

This next bit recalls the earlier scene in which Bruce was, inexplicably, running some kind of field hospital in the church. I was pleased to see the filmmakers decide to have Bruce doing something rather than the whole lot of nothing he does in the books, but it was disappointing that the something they had him doing instead didn’t make much sense.

The same thing happens here. In the books, Rayford and Buck go to work for the Antichrist supposedly because working closely with him will enable them to track his every move, supplying invaluable intel for their resistance efforts. But then that doesn’t happen. They don’t wind up as Trib Force spies who have bravely infiltrated the inner circles of the Antichrist’s power, but just as a couple of guys whose paychecks happen to be signed by the Antichrist. Their close proximity to Nicolae serves the narrative needs of Jerry Jenkins, but it does nothing to advance the agenda of the Trib Force as described in that back-cover blurb.

Given that, it’s refreshing to see movie-Rayford taking a bit more initiative here. It’s his first day on the job and already he’s skulking about in the hopes of stumbling across something to spy on. He finds Nicolae’s unattended laptop and he stealthily downloads secret files from Nicolae’s email onto a disk.

Well, he downloads files anyway. Just not very secret ones. The document he risks his job to steal is titled “Ben Judah Speech – World Presentation Revised.” It is, in other words, the prepared text of a public speech — one that will in a couple of days be broadcast around the world.

It turns out later that this speech relates to actual nefarious-secret Antichrist stuff, but there’s no reason yet for Rayford to know or suspect that. As far as he knows, in the moment, all he’s doing by swiping this file is making it possible to pre-empt a press embargo by a day or two. That’s hardly the sort of thing a double-agent should be risking his position to uncover.

Somewhere on that laptop, after all, must be the plans for the implementation of the Mark of the Beast and the martyrdom of all Tribulation Saints. Those files, one would think, might have been more useful to the work of the Trib Force.

The unintentionally hilarious bit here is the contents of the rest of the Antichrist’s in-box (see screen-grab above). Nicolae Carpathia can cast a spell over the minds of men, but even he doesn’t seem to have a foolproof spam filter.

Corcoran shows himself to be a competent director here, capably hitting all the standard notes in this standard scene wherein a “downloading” screen prompt is exploited for suspense. If we’re feeling ungenerous, we can criticize this scene as a hackneyed cliché copied from hundreds of earlier movies and TV shows. Or, more charitably, we can regard scenes like this one as a kind of formal structure, like a sonnet or a haiku.

That formal structure, as you know, requires that Nicolae enter the room just as Rayford is slipping the disk into his pocket. Currie and Johnson have both seen this, probably both performed this, enough times to produce the requisite awkward tension, and the scene seems to be working according to form.

And then Corcoran tosses in a really odd note, and not a good one. Not content to let two professional actors carry what is probably the most effective scene of the film thus far, the director strangely decides this is the perfect time to pretend he’s doing a remake of John Carpenter’s They Live. When Rayford hands Nicolae a note to give to Hattie, their fingers briefly touch and for that instant it’s like Rayford just put on Rowdy Roddy Piper’s* magic sunglasses — seeing Nicolae’s true face of evil revealed.

That flash of bad special effects erases all of the intriguing possibilities Currie tried to establish in the previous scene. From here on, Nicolae is presented as unambiguously evil and all of his talk about harmony, peace, unity, tolerance, etc., can only be interpreted as dishonest cover for his deliberate pursuit of evil for evil’s sake.

From here on, Nicolae is one thing and one thing only: The Antichrist. Not a character, not a person, not a human being, just an incoherent embodiment of evil cobbled together from disparate Bible passages and 20th-century right-wing fantasies.

Poor Gordon Currie. He tried.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

* Professional wrestler Roddy Piper plays Kurt Russell in They Live, which might have been one of the greatest American movies of all time had Carpenter gotten Russell to play the part instead. Carpenter is widely acknowledged as a skilled director, but he doesn’t get his due as an artist and auteur. This is largely due to his uneven track record of directing several films that failed to star Kurt Russell. Look back at any of Carpenter’s less successful artistic endeavors and they all suffer from this same flaw.

Anyway, Piper is no Kurt Russell, so They Live is no Big Trouble in Little China, but if you haven’t seen it yet, you should. Even without Russell, it’s one of the better anti-Yuppie protest films of the Reagan Era. Plus: Keith David.

Left Behind

Previous Post

February 13, 2012

Why I'm listening to the laity, not to the U.S. Catholic bishops

Next Post

February 14, 2012 Smart presidents saying smart things

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the Sword of the Spirit represent?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Word of God Faith The power of prayer The Holy Spirit