Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Bible stories: Shamgar

Bible stories: Shamgar

Last updated on: October 7, 2011 at 10:57 am by Fred Clark

Bible stories: Shamgar 2011-10-07T10:57:36-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

One of my favorite Bible stories is barely a story at all. It’s the story of Shamgar, the parenthetical hero of the book of Judges.

Here, in its entirety, is the story of Shamgar:

After him came Shamgar son of Anath, who killed six hundred of the Philistines with an ox-goad. He too delivered Israel.

That’s Judges 3:31 and that’s it. That’s all we get. One verse with a body count and an unconventional choice of weapon and almost nothing more. A couple of chapters later, Deborah name-checks Shamgar in her litany of heroes — “In the days of Shamgar the son of Anath, in the days of Jael, the highways were unoccupied, and the travellers walked through byways” — but that’s it.

The matter-of-fact brevity and lack of larger context are tantalizing. Questions arise but are left unanswered. Shamgar slew 600 Philistines — was this all at once? Or was it one at a time over a long time? Were these 600 the combatant soldiers of an invading army, or were they women and children in some ill-fated Philistine settlement?

This is the book of Judges, after all, a bloody, R-rated collection of stories in which little distinction is made between honorable feats of military might and brutal atrocities and terrorism. Samson, probably the most famous of the heroes in Judges, practically invented terrorism. He’s praised in the book for setting fire to the enemy’s crops, employing indiscriminate starvation as a weapon of mass destruction. And he’s praised for being a low-tech suicide bomber, killing himself and hundreds of others by collapsing a building filled with Philistine dignitaries. Then there’s Ehud, the sneaky assassin who smuggled a dagger into the court of the enemy king, gutting him in the royal outhouse.

So in the context of Judges, we can’t be sure that Shamgar’s heroism is really heroic. We can’t know if he was like Daniel Inouye in San Terenzo or if he was like William Calley at My Lai.

My fascination with this hint of an almost-story goes back to my middle school Bible teacher, a man with the delightful name of Kingsley Baehr. Mr. Baehr had a contagious enthusiasm for obscure and forgotten stories in the Bible and he loved the story of Shamgar. He had a great rendition of this story — albeit one that was, he cautioned, purely speculative. Mr. Baehr took that one detail of the ox-goad and wove from it a story of a cattleman turned guerrilla, a deadly ghost who made the occupying enemy army fear the night.

The Philistines — despite the way we’ve come to use their name as an epithet for the uncultured — were culturally and technologically far ahead of the israelites. They had superior metallurgy and thus far superior weaponry. Faced with a more powerful and better-armed foe, the Israelites would have had to rely on what we now refer to as “asymmetrical warfare.” In Mr. Baehr’s rendition, the well-armed occupying army of the Philistines confidently ruled the land of Israel by day, but got frightened when the sun went down, knowing that in the morning they’d awaken to find their numbers reduced by yet another mysterious casualty, slain in the night by what seemed to be a club or a spear. After 600 such nervous nights, perhaps, the invaders decided their occupation wasn’t worth the price.

Total speculation, of course, We can’t even really know that Shamgar’s ox-goad was an ox-goad. The word there is a hapax legomenon — a word that appears nowhere else — and “ox-goad” is just our best guess.

But I like Mr. Baehr’s version of the story, partly because it makes for a good story and partly because it highlights the important moral distinction, sorely needed in Judges, between a guerrilla fighter and a terrorist (You’re Not Allowed to Kill Civilians).

I like to build on Mr. Baehr’s rendition of this story, speculating even further. Maybe this is why the story of Shamgar seems like such a tacked-on afterthought awkwardly inserted into the larger narrative. I imagine the book of Judges being recited in the court of King David, long after the time it chronicles. David fought against the Philistines, so he probably would have liked Judges. He also, for a time before becoming king, fought for the Philistines, and he even had a Philistine in his entourage — a general named Ittai.

I imagine Ittai listening to this recitation of an earlier version of the book of Judges — one in which chapter 3 ends after the 30th verse — and then asking, “What about Shamgar? Don’t tell me you people have forgotten about him. Scary dude with, like, an ox-goad? Ringing any bells? We still tell stories about that guy to spook the new recruits. You can’t leave out Shamgar.”

Serious biblical scholars also can’t seem to help speculating about this enticingly brief and vague almost-story of Shamgar. One theory holds that the verse about Shamgar in Judges is really a misplaced reference to Shammah — one of David’s other “mighty men” who killed hundreds of Philistines in a battle in a lentil field.

Maybe so. But we can’t really know. There’s just not enough to go on, the story is too fragmentary and out of place to know for sure what to make of it.

Oddly, that very fragmentary brevity gives the story of Shamgar a realism that the longer, more detailed tales in Judges lack. In the stories of Samson, Ehud or Gideon — with his folk-tale-ish fleece and his encounter with a mocking, trickster angel — it’s obvious that a storyteller has been at work. That artfulness suggests the possibility of artifice, and one gets the sense one is reading legendary accounts.

But there’s nothing legendary in the single verse that gives us all we have to know of Shamgar. No storyteller seems to have crafted this story. It’s scarcely even a story at all, just a statement, a reminder not to forget about Shamgar because he killed 600 Philistines with an ox-goad, delivered Israel and kept the highways safe.

Yes, but what does it mean? What practical lessons from the text can we apply in our daily lives?

I have no idea. The Bible is a strange book, filled with strange and obscure passages, stories and fragments of stories like this one. I’m pretty sure many of these are not included there just to provide us with practical lessons to apply in our daily lives.

After him came Shamgar son of Anath, who killed six hundred of the Philistines with an ox-goad. He too delivered Israel.

The Word of the Lord. Thanks be to God.

(Image is from The Brick Testament’s book of Judges.)

Uncategorized

Bible

Previous Post

October 6, 2011

The Nephilim fossil of upstate New York

Next Post

October 8, 2011 My Ween it has a first name, it's J-E-S-U-S

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: The Ten Commandments were written on three stone tablets.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE