Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
The IndigNation, defending bullies and the martyr Sally Kern

The IndigNation, defending bullies and the martyr Sally Kern

Last updated on: September 13, 2011 at 9:25 am by Fred Clark

The IndigNation, defending bullies and the martyr Sally Kern 2011-09-13T09:25:42-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I have a theory that the central motivation for much of American politics is a manufactured indignation.

This indignation is stoked by the habitual taking of offense, whether or not such offense is actually there to be taken. The cultivation of such offendedness serves two emotional needs: 1) It’s exciting for those whose lives are otherwise kind of dull and pointless-seeming, and 2) It allows the people taking offense to pretend that they are better than those others whose behavior, imagined behavior, or very existence is cited as the pretext for the offense.

The more vile and evil those others are imagined to be, the more superior the Indignant Ones can imagine themselves to be. Due to the diminishing emotional returns of this voluntary indignation, the imagined crimes of the others must constantly be intensified, eventually approaching the status of Satanic baby-killers. The pose of heroic opposition to Satanic baby-killers has come to play a major role in American politics.

The desperate need to feel better than others, I believe, arises in reaction to moral anxiety or moral insecurity. It is driven by the only peripherally acknowledged fear or suspicion on behalf of the Indignant Ones that there may be something amiss with the way they’re going about their lives. They’re dimly fearful that their own behavior or attitudes may be harming others through neglect or even harming others directly. This insecurity drives the cycle of guilt and resentment in which victims can be transformed into enemies.

This cycle goes beyond merely “blaming the victim.” Blaming the victim is a fearful attempt to make moral sense of the universe by asserting that all suffering must be the fault of those who suffer. The guilt-and-resentment cycle goes further, recasting those who are suffering as the perpetrators of some evil against those who are not suffering — against the Indignant Ones themselves. Rather than just blaming the victims, then, it denies that they even are victims, pretending instead that they are active agents of persecution who must be heroically resisted and condemned for their supposed crimes which, usually, will be portrayed as crimes against innocent children, usually on behalf of Satan.

That’s my theory, which I’ve mentioned here before and will likely continue to discuss because I think it’s true. I think it explains a great deal of behavior that otherwise seems difficult to explain or understand.

Witness, for example, the response by the religious right to a recent burst of attention to the tragic stories of several young people who were bullied and harassed into despair and suicide for being gay or for being perceived as gay. The misery and pain suffered by those children could be traced back in part to the atmosphere of scapegoating and condemnation promoted by the religious right’s long and lucrative history of fundraising by stoking fears of an imagined homosexual menace. That fundraising is, itself, evidence of the quest for a sense of moral superiority through comparison to the imagined depravity of others.

When the suffering caused by that smug pose of indignant self-righteousness started to become more apparent in the spate of media attention paid to the suicides of bullied children, the moral anxiety of the religious right became more acute. In a healthier soul, that insecurity — a guilty conscience — will prompt reflection and repentance. For the habitual offense-taker addicted to indignation and the pretense of superiority, however, such reminders of guilt will instead provoke resentment of those whose suffering is the cause of that guilt. Those victims are not merely blamed for their own suffering, but are portrayed as themselves being a threat. And to make that threat sufficiently wicked-seeming, it must be imagined to be a threat to innocent children.

The victims are thus reimagined as Satanic baby-killers and the moral anxiety is semi-convincingly transformed into a reassurance of moral superiority. The Indignant Ones are thus able to tell themselves that they are better than everyone else and to enjoy the role-playing thrill of pretending to be the heroic defenders of innocent children.

That, at least, is my theory. And that is what I see unfolding in, for example, this video from Focus on the Family, launching its Orwellian “True Tolerance” campaign in defense of bullying (video via Jesus Needs New PR):

I wonder if anyone else sees this as well when they watch this video.

The theory of the IndigNation, I think, helps to explain the current prominence of the politics of resentment in America and, by explaining some otherwise difficult-to-explain behavior, helps us to better understand and respond to the floodtide of misplaced indignation and the unhappiness it fosters among its scapegoats and among the Indignant Ones themselves.

I think, in other words, that this theory is true. I think this is what is going on.

I’m not really sure, though, how one would go about confirming such a theory other than by collecting more and more anecdotal examples in the hope that at some point such examples will come to constitute a critical mass that might be then regarded as data. And I’m aware of the danger of becoming so enamored of one’s own theoretical framework that one begins to see confirmation of it even where other explanations might be more likely. That’s why I’m genuinely asking: What else might possibly explain the religious right’s backlash against anti-bullying efforts? Do such alternative explanations seem more or less likely that the guilt-and-resentment cycle in service of indignation that I have described?

In the meantime, I will continue collecting the anecdotal evidence of willful indignation, self-righteous offendedness and self-serving comparisons to the imaginary evils of Satanic baby-killers.

Here, for your consideration, is another fine specimen of the species: Oklahoma state Rep. Sally Kern. Kern, the wife of a Baptist minister and a former school teacher, has a long track record of blaming victims and recasting them as enemies. “Is it just because they are black that they’re in prison or because they don’t want to work hard in school?” Kern said in April of this year, portraying her former black students as criminal leeches feeding off the taxpayer. In March 2008, Kern described homosexuality as “… the death knell of our country. I honestly think its the biggest threat our nation has, even more so than terrorism. … They are going after, in schools, 2-year-olds. … This stuff is deadly, and it’s spreading, and it will destroy our young people, it will destroy this nation.”

A “deadly” threat “going after” 2-year-olds. Kern’s invocation of the specter of Satanic baby-killers and her scapegoating of GLBT people prompted criticism, in response to which — as the cycle of guilt and resentment would predict — Kern has emphatically doubled down on her demonization of the other, portraying any criticism of her as evidence of her own moral superiority. Now, if the broad outline of the theory of indignation I’ve described is true, we should expect Kern to claim for herself the mantle of the heroically righteous martyr.

I see that Sally Kern now has a book out.

It’s called The Stoning of Sally Kern: The liberal attack on Christian conservatism and why we must take a stand.

Could have been even more ridiculous, I suppose. The publisher likely felt that “The Lynching of Sally Kern” was too inflammatory so soon after her statements about lazy black hoodlums.

And “The Crucifixion of Sally Kern” was probably rejected as a bit too on-the-nose.

But still, The Stoning of Sally Kern.

I think my theory is true.

Previous Post

September 12, 2011

Refusing to bow before the Beast

Next Post

September 13, 2011 Seven things that are not 'ironic'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who predicted the fall of Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Daniel Isaiah Jesus Jeremiah