Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

They tend to get offended

Last updated on: July 28, 2011 at 12:18 pm   by Fred Clark

They tend to get offended 2011-07-28T12:18:10-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So these three preachers walk into the White House for an argument with President Lincoln …

That’s not the start of a joke. It’s a true story, an eyewitness account from the Rev. Nathaniel Brown who was, in 1862, the editor of an abolitionist Baptist newspaper. He was part of a three-person delegation that met with Abraham Lincoln on the eve of the Emancipation Proclamation for a contentious discussion on its necessity, purpose and likely effects.

I posted Brown’s complete account four years ago, and I’m linking back to it today because:

1) Ta-Nehisi Coates has an excellent New York Times column today on the Emancipation Proclamation; and

2) it’s still incredibly awesome as a window into a key moment in American history.

Here’s a snippet:

The President said all his convictions and feelings were against slavery. “But,” said he, “I am not so certain that God’s views and feelings in respect to it are the same as mine. If his feelings were like mine, how could he have permitted it to remain so long? I am obliged to believe that God may not, after all, look upon it in the same light as I do.”

* * * * * * * * *

Kevin Drum has two fine posts up on the enduring slander that poor people are freeloaders who pay no taxes in America: “The 51% Zombie Lie” and “Breaking Down the Lucky Duckies.”

In the latter he notes that any attempt to correct this constantly circulating lie produces a predictable reaction: “They tend to get offended — though somehow never quite offended enough to stop saying it.”

They get offended because that’s their job, that’s their hobby, that’s their drug, that’s their religion. Offended is what they do and why they do it and, increasingly, it is who they are.

* * * * * * * * *

Mistermix at Balloon Juice points us to Andy Rutledge’s awesome tear-down and re-build of the way newspaper website are designed. Rutledge begins:

Digital news is broken. Actually, news itself is broken. Almost all news organizations have abandoned reporting in favor of editorial; have cultivated reader opinion in place of responsibility; and have traded ethical standards for misdirection and whatever consensus defines as forgivable. And this is before you even lay eyes on what passes for news design on a monitor or device screen these days.

In digital media—websites in particular—news outlets seldom if ever treat content with any sort of dignity and most news sites are wedded to a broken profit model that compels them to present a nearly unusable mishmash of pink noise…which they call content.

And from there he goes on to recommend a series of design changes incorporating those things that every reader of newspaper websites already knows, but that no designer of newspaper websites seems to have a clue about. If this perspective had had any influence in Gannett’s online division then I might still have a job.

Mistermix tosses in one of his pet peeves about newspaper websites:

… Newspapers ask that you register and harvest some personal information, yet they never seem to use it. I’ve never been pushed a targeted ad by my local newspaper – they’re a decade behind Google.

I’d add that they’re also a decade or more behind Amazon. What I see when I visit Amazon is not what you see when you visit there. The site is tailored to our preferences and habits based on our histories there.

As mistermix notes, newspaper sites capture all the same data, but they don’t do anything with it. A reader who visits their site every day just to check the business section sees exactly the same site as a reader who visits every day just to read the horoscope. And both readers see the same exact generic Internet ads. That’s just so … so … 20th century.

Uncategorized

journalism

Satanic baby-killers

Previous Post



July 27, 2011

John Stott dies at 90

Next Post



July 28, 2011 A prayer for infrastructure investment


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I refused to bow to a high official and sat at the king's gate, sparking a genocidal plot. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Daniel Haman Mordecai Nehemiah

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

Innocence, identity, and blood libel (cont'd.)

slacktivist

Family

Innocence, identity, and blood libel (part 2)

slacktivist

Family

Innocence, identity, and blood libel (part 1)

slacktivist

Family

Pro-lifers keep killing women and their children

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis

Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

Jesus Was Not an Aristotelian

Aristotle. He’s been called the father of logic, the father of the...

Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey

Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube