Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
TF: A partial list of famous people born of virgins in Bethlehem

TF: A partial list of famous people born of virgins in Bethlehem

Last updated on: May 31, 2011 at 3:05 pm by Fred Clark

TF: A partial list of famous people born of virgins in Bethlehem 2011-05-31T15:05:31-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Tribulation Force, pp. 391-393

There’s little quite as mortifyingly horrible as the church speaker who attempts to “reach the young people of today” by incorporating what he imagines to be their lingo into his message.

The result, almost always, is something wincingly awful and embarrassing for all concerned. The speaker usually sounds like a tourist trying to pretend to be a native speaker while relying on a guidebook of common phrases from 1953. His every over-earnest attempt to convey the idea “I’m one of you” winds up, instead, screaming “I have no idea who you are.”

Something similar is going on here in Tribulation Force as the authors attempt to portray the rabbinical studies of Tsion Ben-Judah. The reader gets the impression that Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins don’t understand Judaism any better than those church speakers understand youth culture.

It’s probably worse than that, actually. The reader gets the impression that LaHaye and Jenkins have never met or spoken to or even seen anyone who was actually Jewish. Ben-Judah doesn’t speak or think like any actual Jew who ever actually walked the face of the actual earth.

But that’s not to say I don’t recognize this character. I do. He’s a dead ringer for Josh McDowell, the cheerfully dim self-styled “apologetics” expert and author of books like Evidence That Demands a Verdict in which he purports to show that the Christian faith can be easily proved and that unbelievers are therefore just being ornery.

The resemblance to McDowell is so uncannily exact in this section that whenever Ben-Judah speaks I get this urge to run up to him to tug at his beard and sidelocks. I’m convinced they’re fake, held on by little bits of elastic looped over McDowell’s ears.

Like McDowell, Ben-Judah seems to imagine himself as St. Paul on Mars Hill, engaged in intellectual debate with the best minds of Greece and Rome. The big difference, of course, is that Paul was actually interested in what the best minds of Greece and Rome had to say. He read their poets and philosophers and was so familiar with them that he could quote them from memory. Those same poets and philosophers wouldn’t recognize themselves in the crude caricatures drawn of them by folks like McDowell.

This systematic construction and destruction of strawmen is bad enough when it’s presented as “apologetics,” but it’s just bewildering when the character presenting such strawmen is supposed to be, himself, a follower of the religion he can’t be bothered to understand. Ben-Judah seems wholly unfamiliar with even the most basic ideas of Judaism. He’s supposed to be a Jew — a great rabbinic scholar, no less — but he comes across as the least Jewish rabbi in all of literature. He’s about as Jewish as an Easter ham.

Thus we have Ben-Judah explaining that the first year of his three-year research project into Jewish messianic beliefs was spent studying a 19th-century Christian. And he follows that up with a summary of “the very first qualification of Messiah” that is taken entirely from St. Augustine of Hippo.

Ben-Judah doesn’t credit Augustine by name, but that’s where this next bit of his argument comes from. It’s nothing that you’ll find in the Hebrew scriptures or in the writings of any actual rabbi, ever:

“The very first qualification of Messiah, accepted by our scholars from the beginning, is that he should be born the seed of a woman, not the seed of a man like all other human beings. We know now that women do not possess ‘seed.’ The man provides the seed for the women’s egg. And so this must be a supernatural birth, as foretold in Isaiah 7:14, ‘Therefore, the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the virgin shall conceive, and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel.'”

This is why Ben-Judah’s broadcast couldn’t be in Hebrew. Only by speaking in English (or Latin) could Ben-Judah repeat the revisionist translation that turns this passage into a prophecy of Jesus’ virgin birth. That was, eventually, a Christian idea, but it was never a Jewish one. It absolutely was never “the very first qualification of Messiah” and it was not “accepted by [Jewish] scholars from the beginning.”

Think again of Paul, who was deeply concerned with making the strongest case he could that Jesus was “the Christ” — the Messiah. Yet Paul never cites Jesus’ virgin birth as supposed evidence of this. Actually, Paul never mentions the virgin birth at all (and may not even have been aware of the idea). Paul’s argument for Jesus as Christ wasn’t based on any of the sorts of things that Ben-Judah is repeating here on behalf of the authors.

Same goes for me, personally. I believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Messiah. But I do not believe that for any of the reasons that the authors present here. And I do not understand that to mean anything like what the authors seem to think it means.

But it’s not just that Ben-Judah’s argument is not Pauline. It’s also not Sauline. Before his conversion, Saul of Tarsus was apparently a devastating foe of the early Christians, putting his encyclopedic knowledge of the scriptures to use to refute their claim that Jesus could have been the Messiah. Saul’s persecution of the first Christians involved his marshaling all of the same passages that Ben-Judah was supposed to have studied here in order to disprove that claim.

Later, of course, Saul famously changed his mind. But his mind was not changed due to his studying the scriptures. Indeed, once he changed his mind, he began to radically reinterpret those scriptures because his new beliefs required that he do so. But what changed Saul’s mind wasn’t the prophecies about the Messiah, it was his personal encounter with the risen Jesus.

There’s no indication in Tribulation Force that Ben-Judah has ever had such an encounter. But then there’s also no indication that Rayford, Buck, Bruce, Irene or the Rev. Billings ever had such an encounter either.

The idea that Isaiah prophesies a virgin birth is wholly alien to Judaism. Even more alien to it is the rationale Ben-Judah gives for this belief, which is the bit he takes directly from Augustine:

“Our Messiah must be born of a woman and not of a man because he must be righteous. All other humans are born of the seed of their father, and thus the sinful seed of Adam has been passed on to them. Not so with the Messiah, born of a virgin.”

This is Augustine’s infamous notion of original sin as a sexually transmitted disease. This perniciously destructive idea — one that, tragically, continues to haunt branches of the Christian church that Augustine reshaped in his image — is the perfect distillation of all the Manichaean and Neoplatonic ideas and lustful obsessions that drove Augustine before his conversion. It was introduced into the church several centuries on. But it was never introduced into Judaism.

So, having established the utterly non-Jewish idea of a prophecy of the virgin birth as the foremost of all “qualifications” of the Messiah, Ben-Judah moves on to qualification No. 2:

“Messiah, according to the prophet Micah, must be born in Bethlehem.” The rabbi turned to the passage in his notes and read, “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of you shall come forth to Me the One to be Ruler in Israel, whose goings forth are from of old, from everlasting.”

We Christians are familiar with that one. We read it every Christmas. But if a friendly Christian were to ask an actual rabbi what they make of it — not Josh McDowell in a fake beard and payot, but an actual Jewish rabbi — they’d likely just say, “OK, keep reading. What does the rest of the chapter say?”

I’m not arguing here that our Christian ideas about messianic prophecies regarding Jesus are all illegitimate. All I’m pointing out is the obvious — that Christianity and Judaism are not identical. Christians and Jews read the Hebrew scriptures differently just as Paul and Saul read them differently. Having Rabbi Tsion Ben-Judah approach those scriptures as a Christian, treating them as a collection of verses about Jesus of Nazareth, is weirdly out-of-character, ignorant and offensive.

But all of that may only be the second-weirdest thing in this chapter.

Ben-Judah still has half an hour or so to go before the Big Reveal at the end of his broadcast where he shocks the world with his surprise announcement of the identity of the Messiah. He and the authors imagine that he’s still being coyly secretive, that no one watching the broadcast knows what he might say next. But he’s already told them that he believes the key facts are that the Messiah must be born of a virgin in Bethlehem.

How many more hints would anyone need? Tsion’s just about halfway through Linus’ speech from A Charlie Brown Christmas Carol — is it really possible that anyone in his audience doesn’t already know where this is going?

Left Behind

Previous Post

May 31, 2011

Patterns

Next Post

June 4, 2011 It's time to panic

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many minor prophets are there in the Old Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

7 12 15 10