Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
TF: Trust-busting

TF: Trust-busting

Last updated on: March 14, 2011 at 9:54 pm by Fred Clark

TF: Trust-busting 2011-03-14T21:54:00-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Tribulation Force, pp. 352-354

Here’s where Buck finally finds out what everybody else already knew about the coming One World Media of Nicolae Carpathia’s One World Government.

I wouldn’t work for Carpathia,” Buck said.

“Then you won’t be in communications.”

“What are you talking about?”

Borland told him of the announcement.

To Buck’s credit, he regards this news of a global media monopoly as a Bad Thing. The authors, too, seem uncomfortable with the idea of a single media conglomerate controlling all the world’s information, but like their protagonist, they’re never quite able to articulate why it would be bad. Neither Buck nor his creators seems quite clear whether an unchecked concentration of power is bad in itself, or if this would only be bad in the hands of a bad person such as Nicolae.

That confusion plays out here as Buck and the authors provide their initial, visceral rejection of this idea. On one level they seem to realize that something important and vital to freedom would be lost under such an arrangement. It’s muted and mumbled, but there’s a kind of grudging recognition here that a free and independent press might just be important for some reason. But on another level, the authors portray everyone apart from the converts in the Tribulation Force as welcoming this news with open arms. The only opposition to the idea, in other words, comes from those characters who know that Nicolae is the Antichrist — from those who object to the global media monopoly mainly because it will be led by a bad person and not because it is, in itself, a bad idea.

What we read here, to put it more starkly, is a situation in which an emperor arises to announce the disbanding of democracy. You are no longer free people with legal rights, this emperor says, but subjects and slaves of me, your absolute ruler. The authors seem able to imagine only two possible responses to this announcement. Those who believe the new emperor to be a good-hearted person celebrate the announcement, grateful for the simplicity and efficiency the new arrangement promises. A small minority who believe the new emperor to be wicked-hearted oppose the new arrangement, but only because they think that this one man in particular should not be trusted with absolute power. The idea that such an arrangement is unacceptable in itself, regardless of the character of the would-be emperor, is simply not addressed.

“Our new master is evil,” the Trib Force rebels say. “Therefore this is wrong.”

“Our new master is benevolent,” everyone else says. “Therefore this is good.”

But no one in this story says, “We should not have a master. We should not be slaves.”

The absence of that response here means the absence of any home in the story for most readers. It’s off-putting, like arriving at the end of a chapter in one of those “Choose Your Own Adventure” books and finding there only repugnant choices. “If you decide to torture the puppy, turn to page 172; If you decide to betray your best friend, turn to page 177.”

Jimmy Borland and Chaim Rosenzweig are portrayed here as confused by Buck Williams’ lack of enthusiasm for Nicolae’s OWM scheme. Their eagerness for such a regime — a world in which they are told what to think — is not just weirdly out of character for a couple of humans, it’s also an insult to this journalist and scientist. It suggests that they and everyone else like them has been lying all along. Their supposed commitment to skepticism and to following the truth, wherever it leads, is exposed as nothing but a sham.

Whatever qualms Jimmy may have had about a monolithic, OWG-run media, he tosses them aside when he realizes that his new role working for the OWM-version of Global Weekly will land him a plum trip to check out the construction of New Babylon:

“I’m going on Global Community One.”

“You’ve sold out?”

“You can’t sell out to your boss, Buck.”

“He’s not your boss yet.”

“It’s only a matter of time, pal.”

This is how the authors imagine that every journalist will respond to the new regime — with delight over their new perks.

As for the rest of the world, the authors drag in Rosenzweig to represent the reception that everyone else is expected to have to news of Nicolae’s OWM. Chaim is upset that the press has been giving too much attention to the two fire-breathing street preachers:

“Nicolae has been on the phone to CNN all morning, insisting that they give the two no more coverage today of all days. CNN has resisted, of course. But when he owns them, they will do what he says. That will be a relief.”

“Chaim! You want that kind of leadership? Control of the media?”

“I am so tired of most of the press, Cameron. You must know that I hold you in the highest regard. You are one of the few I trust. The rest are so biased, so critical, so negative. We must pull the world together once and for all, and a credible, state-run news organization will finally get it right.”

According to the authors, we all secretly yearn for this — we all, deep down, wish we lived in North Korea.

This is all yet again weirdly inhuman. Once again reading this book means stumbling into a situation in which none of the characters do what you would do in such a case, none responds the way you would respond, thinks what you would think, screams what you would scream.

I could make sense of Jimmy and Chaim’s complete surrender here if the authors had at least hinted that Nicolae’s mind-control mojo was being employed, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. Mind-mojo, as we’ve seen it used, seems to require a close physical proximity. Plus, would it make sense to mind-control the entire world in order to facilitate buying up all the world’s media? If you can already control everyone’s thoughts directly, why bother spending trillions in an effort to control them indirectly?

What’s most striking to me about this whole Nicolae-buys-up-all-media business is that it’s totally unnecessary. Tyrants don’t have to buy things. If Nicolae wanted to merge together all of the world’s media companies into a single “state-run news organization” then he could have done so by fiat. He has unchecked, unlimited political power over the entire world (except for Israel). He could just call Stanton Bailey and inform him that everyone at Global Weekly now works for the secretary-general’s office.

Even if we’re supposed to understand that Nicolae doesn’t yet have that sort of power, he very soon will, so why not save himself a few trillion bucks and wait until then to declare himself King of All Media?

Honestly, I’m confused by Nicolae’s status at this point. He’s declared his one-world government and his one-word religion, established his monopoly on force and appointed his 10 princes to rule as his lieutenants over 10 global districts. All that sure seems like the work of a global dictator. But then he still feels the need to get sneaky when commandeering Air Force One, he’s buying a bunch of companies he could just nationalize (globalize? OWG-ify?), and now he’s putting up with “resistance” from Anderson Cooper. The white rider of the Apocalypse hasn’t done a very convincing job of riding forth as a conqueror bent on conquest.

The notion that Nicolae must buy up all of these newspapers, TV stations and media companies* seems to arise from Jenkins’ attempt to salvage some significance from the belabored business about Stonagal and Todd-Cothran back in Book 1. This is an unenviable task, as it involves trying to reconcile some of the contradictions in Tim LaHaye’s oddball political ideology.

The contradiction I’m thinking of here is the ill-fitting combination of his statist/collectivist nightmare and his capitalist/corporatist one. On one hand he subscribes to John Birch Society paranoia about all government as a slippery slope toward socialism, on the other hand he also subscribes to a host of even nuttier conspiracy theories — Protocols-grade stuff about the Illuminati and “international bankers” — that cast a bad light on the unfettered capitalism endorsed by the Bircherism. (LaHaye’s source materials for his views on “international bankers” usually specify that these are “international Jewish bankers,” but LaHaye himself scrupulously avoids that phrase, even going so far as to portray his own fictional international Jewish bankers as Anglo-Saxon gentiles. For a more in-depth look at LaHaye’s Bircher roots and the general strangeness of his ideology, see Skipping Toward Armageddon, by Michael Standaert.)

As the villain in both halves of LaHaye’s scheme, poor Nicolae has to act as both a version of Chairman Mao and a version of a Rockefeller or Rothschild. He has to be both a Bolshevik and a capitalist Tsar. That combination might might sense to Lyndon LaRouche or Alex Jones, but to those not prone to deeply delusional fantasies those pieces don’t seem to fit together.

That contradiction provides a toe-hold, a chink in the armor, a crack in the facade through which we might be able to shine a bit of light. Nicolae’s strange scheme to buy up all the world’s media, in other words, is something we can talk about with friends and family members who read these books.

The influence of the tea party movement — a resurgent, rebranded version of LaHaye’s Bircherism — has led me lately to emphasize the big-picture concerns raised by the popularity of these books. I do not think it is purely coincidental that we saw LaHaye sell 80 million books intended to popularize his political ideology and then we saw that ideology burst forth anew. Listen to Michelle Bachmann or Sharon Angle or any of the other leading lights of the tea party movement and you will hear echoes of LaHaye’s fears and agenda, sometimes even his exact phrases — his fears of one world government and one world currency, his weird notions of the role and reality of the United Nations. The man has done quite a bit of big-picture damage.

But those concerns aren’t what’s closest to home or closest to the heart for many of us. LaHaye’s pernicious influence, like the toxic influence of Fox News, touches most of us most directly through the effect it has had on family and friends — people we know and love — who have become captive to it and who we have watched become less kind, less curious, less intelligent and less capable of happiness than they used to be before this stuff got a hold of them.

In the 1970s there were stories of parents kidnapping their grown children to extract them from alleged brainwashing cults, whisking them away to be “deprogrammed.” In recent years, I’ve heard countless stories from grown children wishing they could do something similar to rescue their parents or grandparents from Glenn Beck.**

Not everyone who reads or even enjoys these books winds up buying all of the tea-party paranoia LaHaye is selling (Amy Johnson Frykholm’s study Rapture Culture: Left Behind in Evangelical America finds many LaHaye’s fans who have at least some reservations about his political theology). But if you know and love someone who has bought into it, and you’ve seen how that changes them, then you will feel compelled to try whatever might help to liberate them.

Kidnapping them and sending them away to be deprogrammed isn’t really an option. Plus that’s not really how this works. How this works is usually slower, requiring more patience. It’s like planting trees. Or like working in an ancient quarry — finding the cracks in the granite, pounding in the wedges, pouring in water and waiting for the expanding wood to do its work.

Here is one of the cracks. Talk to them about Nicolae’s plan for One World Media. Tim LaHaye says this is how Bible prophecy will be fulfilled. He says that the coming Antichrist will acquire huge amounts of private capital that he will use to buy up all the now-competing media companies, forming a global monopoly. Should we allow the Antichrist to do that? Should we allow anyone to do that? Doesn’t that seem to suggest a legitimate and important role for regulatory agencies like the FTC and the FCC? Those agencies have been given the duty and the power to ensure that potential Antichrists aren’t able to control our thinking or limit our freedom by monopolizing control of the media — doesn’t that seem like a Good Thing?

Wedge that into the crack, pour in water and wait.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

* The Antichrist will soon own Disneyland and Disneyworld. What will he change about them? What will he keep exactly the same? Discuss.

** The pseudonymous Richard Ramsey describes this as “Fox Geezer Syndrome.” Ramsey, a conservative, has watched in horror as a steady diet of that channel has transformed his parents into angry, bitter people. His description of that process may be familiar as well to those who have seen their loved ones drift into the ideology of LaHaye’s “Bible prophecy” Underland:

Over the past couple of years, I’ve been keeping track of a trend among friends around my age (late thirties to mid-forties). Eight of us (so far) share something in common besides our conservatism: a deep frustration over how our parents have become impossible to take on the subject of politics. Without fail, it turns out that our folks have all been sitting at home watching Fox News Channel all day – especially Glenn Beck’s program.

Used to be I would call my mom and get updated on news from the neighborhood, her garden, the grandchildren, hometown gossip, and so forth. I’ve always been interested in politics, but never had the occasion to talk about them with her. She just doesn’t care.

Or didn’t. I don’t know when it happened, exactly, but she began peppering our conversation with red-hot remarks about President Obama. I would try to engage her, but unless I shared her particular judgment, and her outrage, she apparently thought that I was a dupe or a RINO.

Left Behind

Previous Post

March 12, 2011

Heavenly exegesis

Next Post

March 15, 2011 Learning to drive

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was an ephah's volume? (Biblical Measurement)

Select your answer to see how you score.

15 liters 10 liters 22 liters 30 liters