Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Team Hell gets loud

Team Hell gets loud

Last updated on: August 4, 2013 at 11:05 pm by Fred Clark

Team Hell gets loud 2013-08-04T23:05:06-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The evangelical blog world seems all atwitter over a forthcoming book by Rob Bell, pastor of Mars Hill Bible Church in Grand Rapids, Mich. The book's title, "Love Wins," is apparently regarded by many American evangelicals as an astonishingly heretical and controversial claim. Love wins? How dare anyone suggest such a thing?

Even more controversial is the book's subtitle: "Heaven, Hell and the Fate of Every Person Who Has Ever Lived." Bear in mind that the book hasn't hit shelves yet, so nobody's actually read it yet, but that subtitle and this promotional video from Bell were more than enough to prompt Team Hell to spring into action.

I'll say this for Team Hell, they're not afraid of repeating themselves.

Maybe they're not very good at supporting their arguments and not very interested in doing much more than sputtering reflexive condemnations, but they sputter with great enthusiasm and they're never shy about getting loud. For a taste of the loudness and the repetitive sputtering, browse about in the Google Blog search results for "Rob Bell," or check out the summary from Christianity Today's liveblog: "Rob Bell's Upcoming Book on Heaven & Hell Stirs Blog, Twitter Backlash on Universalism."

We've seen Team Hell in action before, illustrating their power by bankrupting the ministry of Carlton Pearson and his Higher Dimensions Family Church of Tulsa, Okla.

Once Pearson questioned the idea of Hell and the supposed biblical basis for that idea, Team Hell's response was swift, fierce and merciless. "Heretic," they said. "Bible-denier."

But what they never said then in their attacks on Pearson, and what they haven't said now about Bell's book, is why anyone, anywhere who has ever actually read the Bible would accept that their fiercely defended doctrine of Hell had anything to do with that book. Because, to be clear, this doctrine of Hell is not biblical.

This is why Team Hell's strategy is always the same:

Step1: Loudly attack opponents of Hell as heretics and Bible-deniers.

Step 2: Loudly assert that the doctrine of Hell is biblical.

Step 3: Even more loudly re-assert that the doctrine of Hell is biblical.

Step 4: Repeat Step 3 until you're the only one left talking.

That's not a very compelling construction for an argument, since it doesn't involve logic or evidence. But if loud, angry repetition of unsupported assertions isn't an effective way of winning an argument, it can still be an effective way of ending one or avoiding having to engage one. And since Team Hell doesn't have access to either logic or evidence as support for their position, they figure that will have to do.

By Team Hell I mean those real, true Christians who adamantly argue for a non-negotiable belief in Hell as a physical place that the Bible says is the destiny of all non-RTCs who will go there to receive eternal torment. This belief, they insist, is central to Christianity and anyone who says otherwise, they claim, is abandoning or attacking the Bible.

But again, this idea cannot be found in the Bible. So what the heck is going on? Why do so many devout "authorities" on the Bible get so very upset at the possibility that someone may have written a book challenging an extra-biblical invention? And why do they all shout so loudly and so enthusiastically that any criticism of this cruel invention constitutes an attack on the Bible itself?

Team Hell, of course, disagrees that the idea cannot be found in the Bible. Check out that CT post or any of the posts linked to it and you'll find dozens of members of Team Hell loudly insisting that the Bible is all about Hell — that Hell is such a basic and central part of the Bible's message that to reject the idea of Hell is to reject scripture altogether.

But what you won't find is any of these members of Team Hell actually discussing where the Bible says this, or what the Bible says, or how what the Bible says could possibly be taken to mean this. Because this supposed "biblical Hell" does not exist. The Bible doesn't teach this.

Dante teaches this. Jack Chick teaches this. Iron Maiden and countless B movies teach this. But the Bible does not. The doctrine of Hell can be, with only partial success, taken from Dante and Chick and Iron Maiden and grafted onto the Bible. But it cannot be derived from the Bible.

I would invite anyone who says otherwise to try to make their case. All these teachers, authorities, theologians and self-appointed bishops of evangelicalism's market-driven hierarchy are invited, in other words, to go to Hell.

By that I mean, of course, only that they should open their Bibles and go to the passages they claim teach this invention of Hell and attempt to show how those passages support their endlessly repeated assertion that this idea is "biblical."

Most of Team Hell doesn't even bother to try doing this. They're too busy attacking the infidels — Rob Bell or Carlton Pearson or me — and accusing them of abandoning the Bible. That would be the same Bible I have open right here in front of me — the same Bible that absolutely and unambiguously does not say and cannot be made to say what they are saying it says.

The Bible simply is not part of Team Hell.

The Hebrew scriptures offer no support for Team Hell. None. The pages of the Old Testament mention "sheol," or "the grave," but not Hell. Moses, Elijah, Isaiah and Amos are not a part of Team Hell.

Nor is the apostle Paul. Paul had much to say about "Heaven," or at least about the heavenly meaning of resurrection, but nothing at all to say about Hell.

Team Hell loves to quote Paul despite this. They're particularly fond of Paul's frequent statements about accepting "this gospel" and no other gospel. Team Hell loves to apply such statements to Rob Bell or to anyone else they think might be deviating from their extrabiblical dogma. "There be some that trouble you and would pervert the gospel of Christ," Team Hell says, as though this verse from Galatians were speaking of anyone who believes that Love Wins. And they warn that if anyone "preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed."

But the thing is that this gospel Paul spoke of to the Galatians, the Corinthians and Thessalonians — the gospel that Paul laid out in an extended argument in his letter to the Romans — that gospel makes no mention of Hell. The gospel as Paul preached it, as he described it in his epistles, does not include the doctrine of Hell.

If you want to add Hell to Paul's gospel, then you're preaching a gospel other than that which he preached. Paul is no help for Team Hell. Paul is, in fact, a major obstacle and contradiction to the claims of Team Hell.

The case for Team Hell, ultimately, comes down to three passages.These aren't the only passages that mention Hell, but the others that do so do only that — mention it without any explanation of what the Hell they are mentioning means. The question of what "Hell" means in all those other passages is answered, for Team Hell, in just those three main passages — two from the Gospels and one from John's apocalypse. They provide the entire foundation on which Team Hell has constructed the gigantic edifice of its doctrine.

And they are not sufficient to bear its weight.

We've gone over these three passages before, but let us do again here what Team Hell almost never does and actually read the three passages on which every claim of a "biblical" Hell depends.

1. Luke 16:19-31

There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and who feasted sumptuously every day. And at his gate lay a poor man named Lazarus, covered with sores, who longed to satisfy his hunger with what fell from the rich man’s table; even the dogs would come and lick his sores. The poor man died and was carried away by the angels to be with Abraham. The rich man also died and was buried. In Hades, where he was being tormented, he looked up and saw Abraham far away with Lazarus by his side. He called out, 'Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am in agony in these flames.' But Abraham said, 'Child, remember that during your lifetime you received your good things, and Lazarus in like manner evil things; but now he is comforted here, and you are in agony. Besides all this, between you and us a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who might want to pass from here to you cannot do so, and no one can cross from there to us.' He said, 'Then, father, I beg you to send him to my father’s house— for I have five brothers—that he may warn them, so that they will not also come into this place of torment.' Abraham replied, 'They have Moses and the prophets; they should listen to them.' He said, 'No, father Abraham; but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent.' He said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.'"

2. Matthew 25:41-46

Then he will say to those at his left hand, "You that are accursed, depart from me into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not give me clothing, sick and in prison and you did not visit me." Then they also will answer, "Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not take care of you?" Then he will answer them, "Truly I tell you, just as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me." And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.

3. Revelation 20:11-15

Then I saw a great white throne and the one who sat on it; the earth and the heaven fled from his presence, and no place was found for them. And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Also another book was opened, the book of life. And the dead were judged according to their works, as recorded in the books. And the sea gave up the dead that were in it, Death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and all were judged according to what they had done. Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire; and anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire.

That's the whole ball of wax — the whole ball of fire and brimstone — right there. That's the "biblical" case that Team Hell is always on about.

Pretty weak.

Did you notice anything else those three passages have in common? They all explicitly lay out a soteriological framework that directly contradicts what nearly every member of Team Hell claims he believes.

In our earlier discussion of these passages, we looked at why these passages' references to a "lake of fire" or "eternal fire" or torment in "Hades" cannot easily be read as teaching that this is the proper understanding of the cartography and logistics of the afterlife. That's not what these passages are about. The author in each case is utterly disinterested in the cartography and logistics of the afterlife and each author is so consumed with the primary focus and meaning of what is really being said here that it's hard not to imagine them being extremely angry to learn that their words would one day be conscripted by people mainly interested in arguing for the "literal" existence of Dante's Inferno.

But the really strange thing about Team Hell invoking any of these passages is that none of them supports anything like what Team Hell has to say about who belongs in Hell or why they should wind up there.

What one finds in all three of these passages, instead, is a seeming Pelagianism. All that matters in any of these scriptures is deeds and actions. Not a word anywhere here about grace or faith or the power of Jesus' death and resurrection. Deeds and actions and those alone are what determines the eternal fate of everyone in each of these passages. They couldn't be any clearer on that point — the main point of each passage above. What determines if someone is to be cast into Revelation's "lake of fire"? The dead will be judged, Revelation says, "… according to their works, as recorded in the books. … according to what they had done." Who are the accursed "goats" on Jesus' left hand who will be consigned to "the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels"? Those who did not feed the hungry, welcome the stranger, clothe the naked or comfort the lonely. And why was the rich man in Luke's gospel sent to Hades? Jesus never quite says, but he seems to suggest that the rich man went to Hades because he was rich just as the poor beggar Lazarus goes to Heaven just because he was a poor beggar.

Awkward, that.

Insurmountably awkward, I think, for those members of Team Hell who want to insist that these passages must be interpreted "literally" in support of a sadistic notion of eternity. Because if we read these passages in the "literal" manner that would allow us to regard them as teaching the existence of Dante's Hell then we must also "literally" accept what they say about who that Hell is for. (And it clearly isn't for Gandhi.)

Now as it happens I don't think these passages are about soteriology any more than they are about charting out the details of Heaven or Hell. I think anyone turning to these passages for such things is reading them wrong — that a "literal" reading that turns out to be about something other than what the passage is actually about isn't really "literal" and isn't really "reading." Reading shouldn't be about missing the point.

The point of these passages, clearly, is ethical instruction and I don't think they can really be made to accommodate any other reading. Luke 16:19-31 is not about Hell and it's not about how to avoid being sent to Hell. It's about how you and I ought to respond to the beggars at our gates. Matthew 25:41-46 is not about Hell and it's not about how to avoid being sent to Hell. It's about how you and I ought to respond to the hungry, the thirsty, the stranger, the naked, the sick and imprisoned. Emphasize anything else and you've missed the point. You might as well not have read them at all.

The strongest case for Team Hell, in other words, involves a perverse reading of passages that excludes the very reason those passages were written. And that's the strongest case.

Underlying this pretense about the supposed "biblical" basis for altering Paul's gospel to include eternal torment in Hell is something even stranger. The odder, larger question is why the members of Team Hell so very much want this imagined eternal torment to be true. It can't simply be that they believe this because "the Bible tells me so," because, as we have just seen, the biblical case for this belief is terribly, terribly thin. So, again, what's really going on here? And why?

It's tempting to speculate that this belief has less to do with a desire to uphold biblical truth than it does with a desire for control. The doctrine of Hell, after all, may be biblically indefensible, but it's a terribly useful thing for keeping one's followers in line. But such speculation would of course be irresponsible. I can't know the contents of anyone else's thoughts any more than they can know the contents of Rob Bell's book before they've read it.

Just because I can't think of a decent or commendable reason someone would plausibly get angry over the thought of love winning doesn't mean that their motives are necessarily bad.

Previous Post

February 26, 2011

A Vindication of Democracy

Next Post

March 1, 2011 The epistemology of Team Hell

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Jesus raised whose daughter from the dead?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Darius Thaddeus Bartholomew Jairus