Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
TF: Fly Like a G6

TF: Fly Like a G6

Last updated on: December 15, 2010 at 1:34 am by Fred Clark

TF: Fly Like a G6 2010-12-15T01:34:43-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Tribulation Force, pp. 298-306

The conclusion of this chapter is a flurry of rhythmic editing — a frantic cutting back and forth from Buck's storyline to Rayford's and back again. As in film, this creates a choppy but propulsive effect, giving the sense of some impending collision or climax. Back and forth, back and forth, Buck, Rayford, Buck, Rayford — building towards …

Well, nothing much, it turns out. Rayford rides from the U.N. building out to JFK Airport. Buck rides from JFK to the U.N. building, then back out to JFK. And that's pretty much it. The rapid back-and-forth editing turns out only to be a way of hiding the utter lack of plot and character development in these pages.

We begin by saying goodbye to Rabbi Marc Feinberg, the temple enthusiast who is Jewish and therefore, for these authors, cheap:

As the cab pulled up to the curb at Kennedy International, Rabbi Marc Feinberg said, "I'm sure you won't mind including my trip in your total, as you did interview me."

"Certainly," Buck said. "Global Weekly is more than happy to provide you a trip to the airport, provided we don't have to fly you to Israel."

"Now that you mention it –," the rabbi said with a twinkle, but he did not finish the thought. He merely waved, retrieved his valise from the cabby, and hurried into the terminal.

The miserly Jew stereotype may strike some readers as anti-Semitic, particularly when added to all the John Birch Society/tea party paranoia earlier about a global conspiracy of international financiers. And it looks even worse when we also consider that a central premise of Tim LaHaye's Birchified theology is the premillennial dispensationalist tenet that God's plan of salvation was delayed by "The Jews" — always collectively — refusing to accept Jesus as Messiah and The Jews therefore, collectively, being given a second chance in the End Times to accept Jesus and convert or else be eternally damned.

But LaHaye would argue that he cannot be accused of anti-Semitism because of his unwavering support for right-wing politicians in Israel. Plus, of course, some of his best friends are Christ-killing Shylocks.

Another full page of back-and-forthing establishes that Rayford and Nicolae are headed for where Buck is while Buck will be heading for where they are, until finally Rayford gets settled into the Antichrist's limousine.

Rayford found it strange that though he had been offered no refreshment at the office, Carpathia now insisted on showing him everything available in the limo, from whiskey to wine, to beer and soft drinks. Rayford accepted a Coke.

"Are you not a drinker?"

"Not anymore." …

… "I am not a drinker either," Carpathia said, sipping seltzer water.

Nicolae's abstention is spotlighted here so emphatically that I gather it's meant to be a significant clue about his true identity — the sort of thing that will make studious Antichrist-watchers say, "Aha! Check that one off the list."

But I'm fairly well versed in the Antichrist check lists of LaHaye and Hal Lindsey and I don't remember encountering this before as a criteria or attribute of the Beast. Can anyone help me out here? Anyone know the deeper significance of Nicolae's teetotalism?

In between the ellipses in the quotes above is an odd little snippet of dialogue that's worth a closer look:

"Are you not a drinker?"

"Not anymore."

"Used to be?"

"Never a hard drinker, but occasionally unwise. I haven't touched a drop since I lost my family."

"I was sorry to hear of that."

"Thank you …"

Yes, that last line is Rayford Steele thanking the Antichrist for his kind words and expression of sympathy. And in the circumstance, that's entirely appropriate, because Nicolae's words here are kind. He's one of the few people to express such concern for Rayford and it's another reminder that this diabolical beast seems, in many ways, more fundamentally decent than the heroes we're meant to admire.

"Thank you, but I have come to terms with it. I miss them terribly –"

"Of course."

"But I have peace about it."

"Your religion believes that Jesus Christ has taken his own to heaven, is that it?"

"That's it."

"I will not pretend that I share that belief, but I respect any comfort the thought may bring you."

Rayford wanted to argue, but he wondered at the advisability of doing what Bruce Barnes would call "witnessing" to the Antichrist.

"I am not a drinker either," Carpathia said, sipping seltzer water.

I can't figure out what to make of that statement from Nicolae: "I will not pretend that I share that belief." What it would seem to mean, I suppose, is something like "I will pretend that I do not share that belief," even though of course he does. The Antichrist, in this story, knows perfectly well that the Event was, in fact, the rapture, and that "Jesus Christ has taken his own to heaven."

So we might assume that Nicolae is simply lying — claiming not to believe what he knows to be true. But while it might make sense in this particular instance for him to lie to Rayford about this, it doesn't make any sense in the bigger picture for him to continue to lie to himself about it.

If, as the authors suggest throughout these books, Nicolae is fully aware of the biblical prophecies regarding the Antichrist, then why go through with it? He knows all about the check list, including how it ends, so why should he want to follow such a script? I wouldn't if I were him. Would you? It makes him seem like the guy in the old joke who tries to win his money back by going double-or-nothing on the instant replay.

Nicolae, as a character, would make more sense if he had some largely parallel, but ultimately divergent, alternate prophecy he was working from. It might be an explicitly infernal alternative — the Satanic Apocalypse or some such — but it could also be something more ambiguous. Imagine there is a 2,000-year-old monastery in the mountains near Cluj, where a hermetic sect of scholars has studied and waited, keeping their secrets and biding their time. They regard themselves as Christians, but they split off from the rest of the church around the Council of Laodicea, settling on their own, very different set of canonical scriptures including several apocalyptic writings largely unknown to the world outside the walls of their monastery: "And in the last days the conqueror shall ride forth to prepare the way for the Lamb, and with him and against him shall stand the scribe and the winged man. …"

That sort of thing. That could be interesting and it might make Nicolae's actions make more sense. Because whether or not Nicolae will "pretend to share" Rayford's belief in the rapture, he's got to believe in something if readers are going to find him believable.

Actually, though, what I suspect the authors intended with this odd conversation was to indicate a distinction between mere knowing and believing. That distinction provides the basis for a multitude of evangelical sermons, most of which rely on a garbled inversion of a passage from the book of James.

The idea is that it's not good enough simply to know intellectually that "Jesus Christ will take his own to heaven" — you have to believe it. The word "believe" is necessarily in italics there because that's what belief seems to be in these sermons — italicized knowledge.

Think of something you know. Now, close your eyes, clench them into a tight squint and frown a bit as though you've just heard terrible news. Concentrate on a spot a few inches below your sternum, trying to conjure a warm, fluttery sensation there. Now state out loud that thing you know in as earnestly sincere tone as you can muster.

There you go. Now you're not just knowing like some academic egghead, you're believing. See, the Antichrist may know about Jesus and the rapture, but he doesn't believe in them the way Rayford does. It's just like the Bible says, "You know that God is one; you do well. Even the demons know that — and shudder. … Knowledge without belief is barren."

The problem with those sermons is that's not quite what the Bible actually says. What it really says is, "You believe that God is one; you do well. Even the demons believe — and shudder. Do you want to be shown, you senseless person, that faith without works is barren?"

In the better versions, the garbling is mainly semantic — with what the preacher calls "believing" meaning more or less the same sort of active, tangible thing James meant by "works." Here, for example, is the beloved classic Tightrope Walker Sermon Illustration — presented in this case as making a distinction between "faith" and "belief." Such tortured linguistic distinctions become necessary when you're trying to avoid James' clearer, but inconveniently "strawy" language in the verses that follow (e.g., "a person is justified by works and not by faith alone").

Back at the U.N. building, Buck asks Steve for Nicolae's help setting up an interview with the Two Witnesses in Jerusalem. Landing that interview would be a great "get," but why stop there? If Buck is willing to network with the Antichrist to set up interviews then he should really go for broke — a Global Weekly exclusive interview with War, Famine and Death would be an even bigger coup.

Alas, Steve says, Nicolae probably won't help Buck with his assignment. "Nicolae hates those two," he says, surprising no one, but:

"I'll see what I can do. He's with a pilot candidate today."

"You don't say."

Jerry Jenkins never gets tired of this. He loves to have Nicolae tell Rayford about "a young journalist" while Rayford sits there knowingly, or to have Steve talk to Buck about "a pilot candidate" while Buck smirks that he knows more than Steve might guess. Jenkins is sure that this makes his heroes seem clever.

Nicolae and Rayford arrive at the airport and pull up beside the hangar where Air Force One is being repainted.

Carpathia said to the driver, "Tell Frederick we would like the usual drama."

When the hangar doors opened, the plane was illuminated with brilliant spotlights. …

That "the usual drama" is the closest Nicolae has yet come to exhibiting the droll charm Jenkins has been telling us he possesses.

We've been told twice now about Nicolae's plan to sneakily commandeer Air Force One by having it repainted, and here Jenkins takes another page to describe for us the actual process of this repainting. This is followed by half a page of airplane porn:

Rayford had toured countless new aircraft and was usually impressed, but he had never seen anything like this.

Every detail was richly appointed, expensive, functional and beautiful. In the rear were full bathrooms with showers. Then came the press area, large enough for parties. Every seat had its own phone, modem jack, VCR and TV. A restaurant was midship, fully stocked and with room to move and breathe.

Closer to the front came the presidential living quarters and conference room. One room contained high-tech security and surveillance equipment, backup communications, and technology allowing the plane to communicate with anyone anywhere in the world.

I'm not sure Jenkins is good enough at this sort of writing to land a gig with MTV Cribs, but he's giving it his best shot. Get him started on the luxury amenities of a pimped-out airliner and he writes with a fervor and intensity not found in the rest of the book.

All those amenities are apparently the reason Nicolae has decided to swipe this plane from President Fitzhugh. But for all the time the authors spend rehashing Nicolae's supposedly clever plan to pretend the temporary loan of the plane is a permanent gift, they don't seem to notice that Air Force One is an Air Force plane — and Nicolae already commandeered the entire Air Force several chapters ago. He's also easily capable of nationalizing (global-izing?) Boeing or Gulfstream and ordering them to build him an even bigger, blingier airplane than this one. (He'd probably have to nationalize Boeing anyway, since his disarmament plan would have bankrupted them.)

The only reason I can think that Nicolae would insist on redundantly re-stealing this particular airplane would be the prestige that comes from the aura of Air Force One. But then that aura pretty much goes away when you have the thing repainted.

Back at the U.N., Hattie drops by Steve's office to talk about Rayford so Jenkins will have yet another chance to delight in Buck's pretending not to know his friend.

"You know who was in today?" she said.

He knew, but he didn't let on. "Who?"

Buck realized he would have to stay on his toes with her and with Steve, and especially with Carpathia. They must not know how close he was to Rayford, and if he could keep from them any knowledge of his developing relationship with Chloe, so much the better.

"Rayford Steele. He was the pilot the day I met you on the plane."

Buck takes his cue from this oddly unnecessary explanation and plays along as though this were his only connection to Rayford.

What neither he nor Hattie mentions, and what the authors themselves seem to have forgotten, is that he and Hattie spent an evening together with Rayford and his daughter Chloe, dining together at a fancy restaurant where Hattie took great delight in matchmaking Buck and Chloe. At the time she seemed very proud of how well the two hit it off — so proud that it's surprising that she isn't greeting Buck every time she sees him with lots of prying questions about how things are going with his new girlfriend. But instead she seems to have forgotten that dinner ever took place.

The simplest explanation is that this is yet another screaming continuity error in these books — the sort of thing that tends to happen when a "novel" is hastily typed and never re-read, let alone edited, before being slapped onto the page and shipped to bookstores. But what if Hattie and Nicolae are actually doing this on purpose?

"Well, Hattie, as planned I spoke about Buck to Rayford and he acted as though he had no idea who this 'young journalist' was. Very suspicious."

"And I did like you said, Nicky, and talked about Rayford to Buck. He acted like he barely knew the guy."

"It is as I suspected then. They are obviously hiding something. …"

Steve agrees to drive Buck back to JFK to tour the new plane and Rayford flies back to Chicago so that he can then turn around and fly back to New York before flying to Israel.

"Have you heard from Buck?" Rayford asks Chloe when he arrives home, and in the final lines of the chapter, Jenkins finds a chance to appall readers one more time before moving on.

"He's supposed to call at midnight his time."

"Do I need to stay up to make sure you're awake?"

"Hardly. He doesn't even know we ate our cookies at the same time. I wouldn't miss telling him that for anything."

Left Behind

Previous Post

December 11, 2010

The indignation of the persecuted hegemon: An illustration

Next Post

December 15, 2010 Good news and bad news

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who tricked Jacob into marrying Leah instead of Rachel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Laban Reuben Joseph Esau