Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
TF: Oy vey!

TF: Oy vey!

Last updated on: November 23, 2010 at 12:17 am by Fred Clark

TF: Oy vey! 2010-11-23T00:17:11-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Tribulation Force, pp. 289-293

Before reading these books I would have said that, as a rule, introducing broad ethnic stereotypes into a story is never a good idea. They're insulting and stale and they can't really function as characters since they're indistinguishable from and interchangeable with one another.

Yet here in the World's Worst Books, the arrival of such a stock caricature actually turns out to enliven the storytelling. "Rabbi Marc Feinberg" may be nothing more than a familiar stereotype borrowed from a thousand other stories, but those other stories are all better stories more capably told than this one, and so Feinberg — as cartoonishly unreal as he may be — comes across as more vivid and human-seeming than Buck or Rayford or any of the other supposed characters here in Tribulation Force.

Jerry Jenkins introduces the rabbi as "one of the key proponents of rebuilding the Jewish temple." This lets Jenkins use him to provide a dose of explanation about the history and meaning of the temple, but it also further sets him apart from the other characters because it means he wants something.

Some actors believe the key question for getting into any character or scene is to ask, "What do I want?" Imagine you've been cast to play the role of Buck or Rayford or Chloe. How would you answer that question? It would seem difficult to provide any answer that wasn't quickly contradicted by your character's actions or inactions in the script. We're halfway through the second book and I still have no idea what Buck wants or what Rayford wants.

But I do know what Feinberg wants and so — despite all the awkwardness of the stereotype — he seems more understandable and more real than our heroes. He has a sense of urgency that the others are sorely lacking. Even if he weren't introduced in a frantic rush to get to the airport, he would still seem to have more momentum than just about any other character we've met so far. For all the time these books have spent going to and from the airport, the rabbi may be the first character who actually seemed like there was somewhere he needed to go.

"Walk with me," Feinberg orders Buck as he heads to hail a cab. We're told that Buck scrambles to pull out a notebook and pen, and that he races to take notes on what the rabbi is saying, but care to guess whether he'll ever use those notes for a future article?

"Let me say this: Today I have become a bit of a politician. Do I believe God is a concept? No! I believe God is a person! Do I believe that all the religions of the world can work together and become one? No, probably not. My God is a jealous God and will share his glory with no other. However, can we tolerate each other? Certainly."

That's the first semi-reasonable response to Nicolae's declaration of the "Global Community Faith" as his official one-world religion. It's nice to see the authors conceding that someone other than the raptured real, true Christians is sincere in his faith. But one wonders why they don't imagine that everyone — Muslims and Mormons and atheists — wouldn't respond in much the same way. Again, they really seem to believe that the vast majority of believers and nonbelievers are insincere — pretending to prefer something other than RTCism just to be obstinate.

"But, you may ask, why do I say I have become a politician? Because I will compromise for the sake of rebuilding the temple. As long as I do not have to sacrifice my belief in the one true God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, I will tolerate and cooperate with anyone with a good heart. I do not agree with them or their methods, many of them, but if they want to get along, I want to get along."

So he's willing to compromise as long as he doesn't have to sacrifice his core principles, and he's happy to work with others of good will and he wants to get along with everyone as best he can. Sounds reasonable enough, right?

Sure, to you it does, you heathen — but to real, true Christians it sounds downright evil.

The tell-tale words and phrases here are tolerance, compromise, good heart and get along. These are all clear signals to LaHaye & Jenkins' readers that Rabbi Feinberg is a deluded hippie, embracing an empty-headed, feel-good, kumbaya liberalism instead of the cold, hard, absolute truth. Tolerance and compromise are, for this intended audience, always bad. And Feinberg's belief that anyone could have a "good heart" without Jesus living inside it is meant to show his foolish inability to understand the utter depravity of the unsaved Reavers inhabiting this planet. As for getting along — what fellowship hath light with darkness? As anyone who has ever played Left Behind: The Video Game knows, "get along" is not an option for interacting with others. The only options are convert and destroy.

Rabbi Feinberg continues:

"… Above all, I want the temple rebuilt on its original site. This was virtually done as of today, I predict the temple will be constructed within the year."

The rabbi burst through the front doors and asked the doorman to hail him a cab. "But sir," Buck said, "if the head of the new one-world religion considers himself a Christian –"

Here the rabbi interrupts him, which is a shame, because maybe if he had finished his question it wouldn't have seemed like such a complete non sequitur.

"Ach! We all know it will be Mathews, and that he will likely be the next pope, too! Considers himself a Christian? He is a Christian through and through! He believes Jesus was Messiah."

The take-away here is meant to be that the silly rabbi naively believes Mathews to be a Christian even though we readers know he's just a left-behind phony. What Feinberg doesn't understand is the vital difference between "Christian" and real, true Christian. Sure, there are hundreds of millions of people still on earth after the rapture who, in Buck's phrase, "consider themselves" Christians, but they were all left behind because they're not really, truly Christians. Remember Caryn Litewski, the kindly flight attendant who goes to Mass every Sunday? She's going to Hell.

So is Feinberg if he persists in rejecting Jesus. And that's more or less the working definition here of Judaism: The explicit and defiant rejection of Jesus. You can see that definition underscored in the full quote here from the rabbi:

"He is a Christian through and through! He believes Jesus was Messiah. I'd sooner believe Carpathia is Messiah."

"You're serious?"

"Believe me, I have considered it. Messiah is to bring justice and lasting peace. Look what Carpathia has done in just weeks! Does he fit all the criteria? …"

Tim LaHaye's notion of what he calls "biblical prophecy" is all about "criteria" and check lists. He naturally imagines that this must be how every other religion views the world and how every rabbi must think about the Messiah. He assumes that they must view every biblical prophet and every word about the Messiah the same way he does — as exclusively predictive, a foretelling of the future that has no other, present-tense application.

Feinberg starts to discuss the big Tsion Ben-Judah research project, but Buck cuts him off and steers him back to the subject of the temple:

"What is so important about the rebuilding of the temple?"

Rabbi Feinberg … gave Buck the short course, as if teaching a class of gentiles interested in Jewish history.

He starts telling Buck about King Solomon's temple when a cab pulls up:

The doorman loaded the large valise into the trunk. "Pay the man and ride with me," Feinberg said. Buck had to smile as he pulled a bill from his pocket and pressed it into the doorman's hand. Even if he had to pay for the cab ride, it would be a cheap interview.

Rabbi Feinberg, you see, is Jewish. And as everyone knows, all Jews and Scotsmen are cheap. And pointing this out is always funny.

"Kennedy," Feinberg told the driver.

"Do you have a phone?" Buck asked the driver.

I didn't edit that. That's what it says. Even in a cab, in the middle of an interview, Buck has to stop to make a phone call.

You get the feeling that if the TARDIS were to materialize in Buck Williams' bedroom and the Doctor stepped out to invite him to travel anywhere in time or space, Buck's first reaction would be disappointment that it wasn't actually a phone box.

It turns out that the hyperkinetic rabbi had rushed off so fast with Buck in tow that Buck had no time to get the bag he left with the concierge and now he has to phone the hotel to tell them "he would need his bag stored longer than he had expected."

If you're wondering how the cabbie's carphone works or how Buck got the number for the concierge, Jenkins covers all of that in extensive detail in a fascinating half page of storytelling magic. We'll skip over that here to where the concierge informs Buck that, "Someone took that bag for you."

Buck was stunned. "You let my bag be taken by a stranger who claimed to be a friend of mine?"

"Sir, it's not as bleak as all that. I think the man could easily be located if necessary. He's on the news every night."

"Mr. Carpathia?"

"Yes, sir. One of his people, a Mr. Plank, promised he would deliver it to you."

So, even though Buck's dilemma wasn't mentioned until just now, when he asked to borrow the cabbie's carphone, it's possible you may have been worried about his bag. Don't be. Steve got it.

Weirdly, Jenkins decided to put the conversation with Feinberg on pause for an entire page to tell us that. Even more weirdly, this mundane favor is portrayed as though it were further evidence of Nicolae's unlimited power and unspeakable evil.

(What's next? "A chill ran down Buck's spine when he realized that the fine for his overdue library book had already been paid … by the Antichrist!")

Feinberg seemed pleased when Buck finally got off the phone.

You and me both, Rabbi, you and me both.

Feinberg is still only the sketchiest, broadest outline of a character — what does he look like? where is he from? we don't know — but he's already just as real, and more fun, than any of the characters we've spent the previous 12 chapters following. This account of Buck's first meeting with Feinberg ends with a bit that is, surprisingly, intentionally and successfully amusing:

"Back to the temple!" he shouted, and the driver pulled his foot off the gas. "Not you!" Feinberg said. "Us!"

Buck wondered what a man with such unbounded energy and enthusiasm might do in another profession. "You'd have been a killer raquetball player," he said.

"I am a killer raquetball player!" Feinberg said. "I'm an A-minus. What are you?"

"Retired."

"And so young!"

None of that is terribly original, but it works better than almost any other segment of dialogue in these books so far. Rabbi Feinberg the broad ethnic stereotype turns out to be more interesting than either the Antichrist or his supposed sworn foes.

So let me amend and qualify the general rule we started out with here. Broad ethnic stereotypes are hackneyed and insulting and you should never stoop to including them in your writing — unless, that is, you are such a bad writer that these demeaning clichÃ©s might actually be an improvement over the rest of your story. (Of course, in that case, before resorting to broad ethnic stereotypes you might want to consider just not writing.)

Left Behind

Previous Post

November 19, 2010

Al Mohler: Seller of defective maps

Next Post

November 24, 2010 More on Mohler

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the name for the Christian practice of immersion or sprinkling in water to welcome believers?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Eucharist Confirmation Baptism Ordination