Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
TF: Back to the airport

TF: Back to the airport

Last updated on: June 24, 2012 at 3:26 pm by Fred Clark

TF: Back to the airport 2012-06-24T15:26:24-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Tribulation Force, pp. 258-265

Rayford Steele flies into O'Hare International Airport, then drives home, eats some Chinese take-out and goes to Bible study. Buck Williams eats some Chinese take-out at Rayford's house, goes to Bible study, then drives off to O'Hare International Airport. While Rayford is at the airport, Buck is on the phone. While Buck is at the airport, Rayford is on the phone.

That is all that happens in these pages. Less than that, actually, since we're never told anything about what happens at Bible study.

Buck manages to squeeze three phone calls into these seven pages, but like the rest of what we read here these do nothing to advance the plot or to reveal character. Two of the calls are to arrange the details of his flight(s), the other, to Chloe, is to arrange the details of their dinner date.

This obsession with airports is an expression, I think, of the odd notion in corporate America that flying around a lot means you're really important and valuable. That doesn't apply to lower-echelon employees like salespeople or trainers — the people who really do need to physically travel from place to place. But there's a certain kind of executive travel that mainly just serves to assert that the executive in question is so valuable to the company that it's worth hundreds or thousands of dollars to shuttle him about just to allow workers in many different places to bask in the glow of his physical proximity. "I have a meeting in Chicago," the executive says, by which he means, "There is no one in all of Chicago who can do what I do. I am Very Important."

That, I'm guessing, is the same message Jerry Jenkins is trying to convey about our heroes. And so he has them, just like those executives, flying around a lot instead of actually doing anything worthwhile.

Jenkins reinforces this message with the usual random praise for our heroes from peripheral voices. For Rayford this comes from the news anchor on the in-flight TV. The anchor briefly discusses some minor stories about the unification of the world's currency and the formation of a global military (Nicolae's brilliant plan to restation the world's navies in the Iraqi desert) then segues into a report on the big story that everyone seems to be talking about:

Rayford saw a brief special on the new Air Force One, a 757 which would be delivered to Washington's Dulles Airport and then flown to New York to await its official maiden voyage under the control of "a new captain to be announced shortly. The new man has been culled from a list of top pilots from the major airlines."

The obsessive media attention paid to the crew of Air Force One* has become an unintentional running gag in this book. But then almost every aspect of what does or does not constitute "news" here is hilariously strange. The disappearance of every child on the planet is now hum-drum old news — even though Buck's article on it has yet to hit newsstands. But a rabbi's studies of the scripture merits a press conference. And an interfaith gathering is seen as the stuff of special bulletins:

In other news, Carpathia was quoted as saying that he and the ecumenical council of the meeting of religious leaders from around the world would have an exciting announcement by the next afternoon.

I think the suggestion of an exciting announcement from an ecumenical council involves some kind of oxymoron. Try it yourself. Try saying, "Hey! There's going to be an announcement from the ecumenical council!" without making those exclamation points sound sarcastic. Can't be done.

The authors' strange idea that an "ecumenical council" would be big news probably arises, in part, from their reading lots of the sort of religious right newsletters in which such things are treated as big news. Beverly LaHaye's Concerned Women for America tends to treat the Parliament of World Religions as though that group was not just a forum for dialogue amongst the faiths that share this planet, but as though it was an actual parliament — a legislative body making binding legal decisions to reshape the doctrines of the various faiths. That's nonsense, of course, a very similar nonsense to the sort of weird federation-of-planets notion that Tim LaHaye has of the United Nations.

(Whether or not the folks writing such nonsense for the CWA action alerts really believe it or not is hard to tell. I'm afraid that by now they probably do. I think at first they knew they were misrepresenting interfaith respect as syncretism just because it made an effective fundraising pitch, but over time I think they came to believe their own lies and embellishments, forgetting that the stories they're now so scared of were originally just scary stories they made up to rally the faithful into writing checks. See also: The Homosexual Agenda.)

The random unsolicited praise for Buck comes from the assistant to the pope-apparent, who informs him that "the cardinal had been so impressed with Buck's interview of him for the soon-to-appear cover story."

It seems Peter Mathews, the soon-to-be-last pope, has forgiven Buck for slamming him with Ephesians 2:8-9 and pwning him Luther-style on the evils of good works. The cardinal is so fond of Buck, the assistant says, that he's agreed to a second interview if Buck will join him on his flight the next morning from Cincinnati to New York.

Thus we have Buck first flying from Chicago to Cincinnati tonight — all part of Jenkins' plan to have the next two chapters of the book set mainly in airports and airplanes.

Cincinnati is only a five-hour drive from Chicago, just long enough for Buck to get a substantial look at the landscape of post-Event America. But of course, the authors aren't interested in exploring post-Event America. That's why Chloe's miraculous trip home from Stanford the day after the Event was never described and she never speaks of it. And anyway, Buck can't drive to Cincinnati — important people like Buck always fly.

You're forgiven, by the way, if you had forgotten that Chloe was ever a college student out in Silicon Valley. Chloe and the authors seem to have forgotten that too. Thus we're treated to a scene in which Buck shows Chloe how to use the Steele's home computer, which we're told she did not know how to use and which "had not been turned on since the week of the disappearances," despite Chloe's new job conducting "research" for Bruce.

Within a few minutes, Buck had Chloe connected to the Internet and set up with an e-mail address. "Now you can reach me anywhere in the world," he said.

Chloe is apparently dazzled by Buck's manly navigation of AOL (this was written in 1996, remember).**

This happens after their Chinese take-out dinner, during which we are told that Buck and Chloe conduct a deeply meaningful and meaningfully deep conversation.

Buck and Chloe sat in the kitchen, eating and talking for more than an hour. They talked about everything — their respective childhoods, families, major events of their lives, hopes, fears and dreams.

A few pages earlier, when they were talking on the phone, Jenkins provided a page-long transcript of their entire conversation detailing the logistics of their planned dinner meeting. Chloe also told Buck, at length, about her father's decision to pilot the flight to Israel — we readers already knew about that, but we hadn't yet had the pleasure of hearing it repeated for Buck's benefit.

Redundant exposition and logistics we always get to read word-for-word. But
when two characters have a conversation about their "hopes,
fears and dreams," all we are told is that this conversation took place. We know nothing more about their hopes, fears and dreams than we did at the start of the book.

Jenkins' rule for dialogue seems to be that every logistical matter must be discussed aloud by his characters, but anything that might reveal who those characters are ought to be left unspoken and unwritten, only summarized in the most generic terms possible. Jenkins is so intent in this scene not to allow readers to eavesdrop that he brings Rayford in to meditate, again, on the candies from Hattie:

Rayford left Buck and Chloe … and examined the mints. … Rayford decided they had not been tampered with, and even if they had come from Hattie Durham for some inexplicable reason, there was no sense in not enjoying them.

This all takes place seamlessly within a passage otherwise written from Buck's point of view. There are no visual cues (none of the line breaks or horizontal lines Jenkins usually uses) and nothing in the text to transition in or out of this paragraph inside Rayford's head, inserted in between two paragraphs inside Buck's. It creates the strange impression that Buck, somehow, can read Rayford's mind.

No section of Tribulation Force would be complete without at least one howling reminder that the authors and their characters are completely disregarding the effects of the Event that's supposedly our story's premise. That line here involves Buck's trip to the airport:

Buck and Chloe left the Tribulation Force meeting early to get to the airport. Traffic was lighter than he expected, and they arrived more than an hour before his flight.

What does it mean to live in a world without children? What does it mean to live in a world wracked by the trauma of two billion friends, neighbors, relatives and strangers disappearing in an instant without explanation?

Well, for one thing, less traffic.

As they walk into the airport, Chloe reassures Buck that she will be perfectly safe walking back to her car, alone, late at night:

"I've done it lots of times," she said. "There are a lot of security guards."

So again we see that the nihilistic anarchy of the godless, depraved post-Event world is rather flexible.

The authors' inconsistency on this point is probably mainly just sloppiness — consistency requires a sustained attention that Jenkins doesn't care to provide. But I think there are a couple of other reasons that their supposedly depraved, godless, lawless world comes across as so harmless and benign.

Christian-branded fiction isn't allowed to contain even a suggestion of sex or violence. We're reminded of these stricter-than-G-rated restrictions again during their walk into the airport:

He lugged his leather over-the-shoulder case with his whole world in it. Chloe seemed awkward, but Buck had nothing for her to carry, and they weren't at the hand-holding stage yet, so they just kept moving. Every time he turned so she could hear him, his bag shift and the strap slipped off his shoulder, so they eventually settled into a silent trek to the gate.

So world-traveler Buck needs to get some better luggage.

He also needs to stop obsessing over the propriety of premarital hand-holding. This fixation on sexual morality winds up hypersexualizing everything. Holding hands is not sex. It's not even sex-ual. But in the RTC moral code that Buck magically internalized upon conversion, all affection is sexual. For Buck and the authors and the formal and informal censors at Tyndale House publishers, holding hands is lascivious.

That's perverse. Or, at best, immature. There's something junior-high-ish about Buck's apparent notion that hand-holding constitutes first base (second base: holding hands with fingers interlaced). And if that seems like naive innocence to you, then you don't know what it means to be a boy in junior high.

A book that regards premarital hand-holding as controversial isn't a book that can easily accommodate any real exploration of what a depraved mob of godless, lawless, nihilist criminals might be up to. Nor will authors accustomed to this mode of thinking be very capable of imagining such a scene.

Think way back to Bruce's description of himself as a "good" visitation pastor, apart from the occasional peek at a Playboy. That ogling was portrayed as a particularly grievous sin. Bruce's habit of blowing off hospital visits wasn't regarded as quite so serious an offense (this despite, you know, "I was sick and you did not visit me"). The authors don't appreciate the depravity of depraved indifference. So since they're not allowed to portray any depravity that involves sex or direct violence, and since they cannot imagine any depravity apart from that sort, they wind up giving us a depraved, lawless, post-Event world in which walking alone through a dark parking lot never seems dangerous.

The awkwardness of our couple's "silent trek" through the airport gives way to some even more awkward attempts at flirtation. This isn't all bad, but the parts that are bad are so skin-crawlingly bad that we'll just skim right past and save our strength for the more intense flirtation in next week's passage. (Buck and Chloe bond over airport cookies. Again. Because attempting to recreate an earlier moment of happy spontaneity always works so well.)

If Buck and Chloe are at the airport, then Rayford must be on the phone. And if he's not on the phone with Buck or Chloe, then he must be talking to either Earl or Hattie, because those four are the only people Rayford ever talks to.

It's Earl. He's calling Rayford because he just got off the phone with Hattie. "Is that the same Hattie Durham who used to work for us?" Earl asks Rayford.

"One and the same."

"She's Carpathia's secretary?"

"Something like that."

"Small world."

Very, very small.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

* I don't recall ever seeing a single news story on the pilot or crew of Air Force One, let alone this kind of breathless blow-by-blow coverage. I suspect that may change next year, though, if the Republican Party regains control of the House of Representatives in November. That's sure to bring us weeks of relentless stories on the "PlaneGate" controversy arising from the discovery that one of the assistant baggage-handlers on the president's plane is Muslim or homosexual or something. Weeks of subpoenas, depositions and congressional hearings will dominate the news until the non-scandal of PlaneGate eventually fizzles out, replaced by TomatoGate and the ensuing congressional investigation into whether Michelle Obama is violating child-labor laws by allowing schoolchildren to volunteer in the White House vegetable garden.

(No, I'm not looking forward to 2011. I remember the silliness of the Clinton years and this promises to be much, much worse.)

** The Internet will come to play a larger role in subsequent books, but here in Tribulation Force it's just another missed opportunity. I'm picturing Chloe and Rayford surfing Christian chat rooms — all eerily silent since being abruptly abandoned mid-thread three weeks ago. Then they stumble across a chat room on End Times prophecy, with the same question posted repeatedly, every few hours, without reply: "Is anyone else out there?"

That sort of thing would have allowed the authors to introduce a desperately needed new voice from somewhere else in the world. Plus just think of the possibilities in terms of the fantasy wish-fulfillment at the core of these books. The
new character could be a former atheist
troll who had frequented the Rapture Prophecy chat room just to mock and pick fights. What better vehicle for illustrating the authors' main message of "You'll see, someday soon, when we're all raptured and you're left behind!"

Beyond that, though, the form of chat-room transcripts could provide a deliciously creepy structure for a story on the aftermath of a premillennial dispensationalist apocalypse. Or a zombie apocalypse, for that matter. The tale of a zombie apocalypse told entirely through chat-room transcripts could be very creepy indeed. (I'm thinking of something like Night of the Living Dead meets Balin's journal from Moria.)

Left Behind

Previous Post

July 31, 2010

This land is your land

Next Post

August 8, 2010 Greetings from Omelas

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many plagues did God send upon Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

12 7 5 10