Much will be asked

Last updated on: May 19, 2010 at 4:05 pm by Fred Clark

Much will be asked 2010-05-19T16:05:42-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Since I've written a bit lately about people who have chosen to become much more stupid than they need to be, let me take a moment to also discuss how this same dynamic can afflict actual geniuses — or at least those geniuses who seem most eager to have us think of them as geniuses.

What I mean is that I'm not terribly impressed by Mensa.

I think I'm supposed to be, and I would have expected I would be, but I can't find much reason to be impressed by them.

"Mensa International: The international high IQ society" (redundancy is a mark of genius, apparently) is an association of some of the smartest, sharpest minds on the planet. But what have they done for us lately? Or, well, ever?

You might think, given their collective brainpower, that the rest of us would speak of Mensa in tones of reverent gratitude for all the wonderful solutions their cumulative genius had found for the world's intractable problems. But we don't speak of them this way because applying their brainpower to solving the world's problems is not what Mensa is all about.

It seems to be more of a support group — a collection of really intelligent people who think highly of intelligence:

Mensa has three stated purposes: to identify and foster human

intelligence for the benefit of humanity, to encourage research in the
nature, characteristics and uses of intelligence, and to promote
stimulating intellectual and social opportunities for its members.

I think that's a bit confused. "Fostering intelligence for the benefit of humanity" seems to swallow its own tail. Intelligence serving intelligence for the sake of intelligence seems like a closed circle. What is all this intelligence, ultimately, for?

As bright as these folks are, I'm not sure they really understand what the word "genius" means. For example, I have no idea how high Harper Lee scored on the Stanford-Binet test, but I don't care. It seems to me she has a clearer claim to the title of genius than many of these Mensa members who seem so eager to claim it.

On her side of the ledger we have To Kill a Mockingbird. On their side we have some impressive test scores. Which is the better measure of genius? Creating something luminous and indelible? Or impressing others with test scores?

What I'm getting at here, to paraphrase Winston Groom, is that genius is as genius does. Or as someone else once said, By their fruit ye shall know them.

Mensa members might point out that their organization was not founded to do anything or to bear fruit, but that's just my point. The group, by it's own definition, is self-serving — and that's not what genius is for or what genius is.

The association gives off an aroma of self-entitlement — an attempt to acquire the recognition due to genius without the accomplishment that title necessarily entails. It seems to be — to quote another famous genius — an attempt to claim credit for the 1-percent inspiration without putting in the 99-percent perspiration. I want to see these people sweat "for the benefit of humanity."

Their test scores may reveal the capacity for genius, but real genius doesn't stop there on the threshhold, proud of its unrealized potential. Real genius creates, invents, discovers, envisions, unmasks and reveals. It gives something to the rest of the world — the phonograph, Atticus Finch, polio vaccine, Landscape at Auvers in the Rain, the Bo Diddley beat, key lime pie, the First Amendment, the theory of relativity, the 14th Amendment, the Chrysler building … or that oil-spill containment system our geniuses have apparently forgotten to get around to inventing just yet.

What I'm suggesting here is that these very intelligent people might achieve more and better leverage — better exercise, in all senses of that word — their intelligence if they shifted their gaze and their priorities outward.

Here again I turn to my favorite passage from E.F. Schumacher's Small Is Beautiful:

So this is the first question I suggest we have to face. Can we
establish an ideology, or whatever you like to call it, which insists
that the educated have taken upon themselves an obligation and have not
simply acquired a "passport to privilege"? This ideology is of course
well supported by all the higher teachings of mankind. As a Christian, I
may be permitted to quote from St. Luke: "Much will be asked of him
because he was entrusted with more." It is, you might well say, an
elementary matter of justice.

If this ideology does not prevail, if it is taken for granted that
education is a passport to privilege, then the content of education will
not primarily be something to serve the people, but something to serve
ourselves, the educated. The privileged minority will wish to be
educated in a manner that sets them apart and will inevitably learn and
teach the wrong things, that is to say, things that do set them apart
…

When intelligence is viewed as a "passport to privilege" it will, as Schumacher says, inevitably go astray. It will "learn and teach the wrong things" and, in so doing, it becomes less intelligent than it might otherwise have become.

Regardless of where you begin on the bell curve of test scores, empathy and concern for others will make you smarter. And disregard for others will make you stupider.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 18, 2010

TF: The Scornful Colleague

Next Post

May 20, 2010 Small wonder

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many days did God take to create the world?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ten Six Seven Two