Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
LBTM: Think Different

LBTM: Think Different

Last updated on: May 28, 2015 at 5:33 pm by Fred Clark

LBTM: Think Different 2015-05-28T17:33:36-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Check out the woman bandaging CamCam’s leg at the church. She isn’t introduced by name, but I’d recognize that crestfallen frumpiness anywhere. Hello again, Loretta.

I’m used to seeing more of that sort of thing in the movie adaptations of blockbuster best-sellers. The Harry Potter movies and Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings movies are filled with fleeting glimpses of characters from the page who had to be cut or condensed out of the films. Those little touches are a shout-out or a concession to the biggest fans of the books, those who are likely to be most demanding and most inevitably disappointed by the film adaptation.

Apart from this cameo by Loretta, there’s very little of this here in Left Behind: The Movie. This is partly due to the fact that the book was so poorly written. The characters and scenes that were cut for the adaptation weren’t vivid enough for anyone to complain about their absence. It’s also partly due to the nature of the fandom for this book series. Fans of the Harry Potter series loved to spend time in the world that J.K. Rowling had created, so they read and re-read her books, exploring every corner of every hallway of Hogwarts. The millions of readers of the Left Behind series, by contrast, were simply desperate for something, anything, they’d be allowed to read. They don’t care about the minor details and the minutiae of the world of these books, they’re just seeking validation for and by their subculture. So instead of cameos by otherwise absent but beloved minor characters, we get stunt casting, with Jack and Rexella, Bob Carlisle and Rebecca St. James.

“So you’re researching the disappearance of these people,” Rayford says to CamCam. He says it just like that, “these people” — not “my son,” or “our children,” just these people, as though this were an abstract puzzle to be considered dispassionately. “You say that you’re interested in finding out what really happened to them. Take a look at this, it might help.”

Rayford pops in the In Case of Rapture video and we see T.D. Jakes reciting 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 and explaining that this describes the Rapture that has just taken place exactly as those verses describe. Well, except for the part about the Lord himself coming down from heaven with a shout. Or the part about the the voice of the archangel and the trumpet of God. Or the part about the dead in Christ rising first. But apart from everything in verse 16, actually, it’s exactly like what verse 17 describes.

Well, not exactly, but quite similar. Kind of. Almost.

Oh, and make sure you don’t read the rest of the chapter. Or the chapters before and after this one.

“Some guy thinks the Bible has an explanation for the vanishings?” CamCam asks, dismissively. “Come on, those scriptures are so vague, they could mean anything.”

Jakes/Billings only cited one passage, but CamCam says “scriptures,” plural, because his lines here have nothing to do with Buck Williams in a particular time and place responding to a particular biblical passage. His lines here, rather, are meant to represent the views of everyone in every time and every place who has ever failed to accept the particulars of Tim LaHaye’s brand of premillennial dispensationalism. In this specific situation, CamCam’s protest makes little sense. The scripture the pastor cites can’t mean just anything. I don’t think it can even be stretched to mean what the pastor says it means.

But Jakes did accurately describe the millions of children and babies disappearing, so the moment that follows here is somewhat effective. “Something else I should tell you,” Bruce Barnes says. “Pastor Billings vanished with the rest of them. I helped him make this tape three years ago.”

Gasp!

It’s odd that there’s no soundtrack, no score playing here. Based on the over-the-top scoring accompanying the earlier Big Moments, I’d have thought the filmmakers would have followed Bruce’s line there with something loudly redundant, possibly involving kettle drums. I’m guessing the lack of a score here has more to do with financial than artistic restraint.

This is the scene in the movie where a character is forced to suddenly confront and accept what kind of story they’re in. The more outlandish and fantastic the premise of the story, the more genre-resistance we can expect from the character. And this story is quite outlandish and fantastical.

But CamCam has already seen more than enough to convince him of the premise he’s facing here. By this point he really shouldn’t be this resistant to what he’s being told. The scene should be playing out more like this:

XANDER: Yep. Vampires are real. A lot of them live in Sunnydale. Willow will fill you in.WILLOW: I know it’s hard to accept at first …

OZ: Actually, it explains a lot.

CamCam can protest all he wants that the prophecies Bruce starts rattling off don’t make any sense, but he should quickly realize here that the game is rigged, the story is what it is and whether or not it makes sense, he’s stuck with it.

As Nurse Loretta bandages his leg there at New Hope Village Church, CamCam has his laptop running through Dirk’s top-secret PowerPoint presentation. CamCam doesn’t seem to have realized that he’s putting their lives at risk. Nor has it yet occurred to him that the people who killed Dirk and Alan might be going after Ivy and her special friend next.

Bruce gets out his PMD Bible prophecy decoder ring and smugly explains that its tidy interpretations are both obvious and unquestionable. That Bushian smugness is the clearest sign yet that Bruce has really converted and become a real, true Christian. It is the hallmark of RTC-ism, the difference, I suppose, between knowing and believing.

The passages Bruce cites are nowhere near as tidy as he makes them out to be. Daniel chapter 7 is deliriously opaque, but clear enough that it can’t really be stretched to fit Bruce’s application. The consecutive reigns of 10 kings doesn’t seem like either a direct or a symbolic equivalent for 10 tracts of barren land. And read Ezekiel 38 for yourself and decide whether it’s really that close a fit for the flaccid nuclear assault we saw at the beginning of this movie.

For the most part, I’ve tried to avoid wading into exegesis and debates about the arcana of Tim LaHaye’s theology, but Bruce’s interpretation here of 2 Thessalonians 2 is so deeply weird and torturous that it bears a closer examination.

Bruce misquotes the passage — inserting the word “antichrist” where it cannot be found. But the weirdest thing here is his insistence that this passage is a prophecy about the rebuilding of the Temple. The passage says that the coming man of lawlessness “will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.” LaHaye and Bruce believe this was written by Paul sometime in the middle of the first century, yet they insist it is not a reference to the Roman emperor who, proclaiming himself to be God, destroyed Jer
usalem and the Temple in 70 CE. Rather, LaHaye and Barnes suggest, this is a reference to an Antichrist from the distant future who will, 2,000 or more years later, rise to power and rebuild the Temple just so he can then destroy it all over again. LaHaye and Barnes thus also believe that Paul deliberately avoids mentioning the destruction of Jerusalem, withholding that useful bit of information from James and Barnabas and all of his other friends in that city. I guess he didn’t want to ruin their surprise.

The interpretation here, in other words, isn’t merely wrong. It’s warped and cruel.

But of course in the context of the fictional story being told in LBTM, it doesn’t really matter whether or not any of the biblical interpretation or theology makes any sense. In the context of this story, all this biblical gobbledygook is just phlebotinum and technobabble. It doesn’t have to make any more actual sense than all that stuff in Star Trek about dilithium crystals or tachyon pulses. It’s necessary here only to persuade the audience to suspend their disbelief enough to accept the parameters and premises of the story being told.

This explains quite a bit about the Left Behind franchise. At their core, these books and movies take a storytelling device designed to suspend disbelief within the bounds of the story and they try to use to to instill belief beyond the bounds of the story.

It also doesn’t help that Clarence Gilyard stumbles through the phlebotinum, at one point citing “Daniel 9, chapter 27.” That’s a pretty huge gaffe for this audience.

CamCam decides that all of this means he has to go back to New York to warn Chaim Rosenzweig not to share his magic formula with the Antichrist. Bruce could have advised him to stay to watch the rest of Billings’ video, which goes on to describe, in intricate detail, everything that is going to happen over the next seven years. But like St. Paul, Bruce decides to withhold the most useful information in his prophecies and instead just feebly tells Buck not to ignore God “tugging at his heart.”

CamCam limps off (limping on both legs, for good measure) cutting through the “emergency center” in the church’s sanctuary. The place is inexplicably crowded, as though an earthquake or tornado had just torn through Carol Stream. Who are these injured people? Buck was there because of a car bombing and because he can’t let the conspiracy catch him in a hospital. Were all of these people hurt in other car bombings? Are they all hiding from the conspiracy?

I’d guess that if we asked the filmmakers where these injured people came from, they’d answer that these were the people hurt in the post-Event accidents and crashes. But that was three days ago and we saw this same room a full 24 hours after the Event, completely empty except for Bruce and his paddle ball.

Back at the United Nations in Toronto, we have a study in quick and dirty set design. Say you have a scene with an official UN spokesperson, but you don’t know what the UN flag or seal looks like and you don’t have the budget to mock one up anyway. Not a problem. Just shoot your scene in the hallway or stairway of some municipal office that has its official seal on the wall, but shoot it all blurry so no one can see details. All those official seals pretty much look alike anyway.

Same thing with military uniforms.

Anyway, the spokesperson scene exists only to tell us that Nicole Carpathia has officially become the U.N. secretary-general. I thought that had already been established, but whatever.

CamCam is back at the UN — whether he flew there via Ken Ritz or the airlines are flying again we’re not told, although Stonagal and Cothran are there too, so we know at least that the super-rich are able to fly in from London.

CamCam’s headed to Chaim’s office when he gets stopped by Cadaverous Security Guy, but CSG is overruled by a suddenly authoritative-sounding Hattie Durham. I don’t know whether she’s supposed to come across as a brainwashed podperson or if this is just Mrs. C’s notion of a professional attitude, but in either case she ushers him in to see Rosenzweig.

Chaim Rosenzweig here stands as a surrogate for two things that don’t really go together. On the one hand, he represents the nation of Israel. On the other hand, he represents a naive, almost messianic, faith in the United Nations. What is it about the long history of Israel’s dealings with the U.N., one wonders, that leads the filmmakers to think their embodiment of Israeli nationalism should also be the embodiment of blind faith in the U.N.? This is vintage LaHaye-ism. He’s obsessed with both Israel and the United Nations, but he’s never allowed that obsession to cause him to actually learn anything at all about either of them apart from what he claims to know from “Bible prophecy.”

There is one thing in all of this for which the filmmakers deserve a bit of credit. Unlike the novel, LBTM makes Stonagal out to be a credible red herring. The movie consistently portrays him as the prime suspect for Antichristhood, consistently also portraying Nicolae as a naive idealist being unwittingly manipulated by this evil man. That pays off in the Big Finale much better than it does in the book.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. CamCam convinces Rosey of the Conspiracy’s plot to control the entire world’s food supply and they decide to take this information to Nicolae.

Jesus said that God, “maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.” And yea, verily, so too doth Steve Jobs maketh his products to be placed in the awful movies and in the good, and provideth laptops for the heroes and the villains alike.

This may be my favorite piece of product placement ever.

Nicolae flares his nostrils and chews some scenery and tells Buck, “Do not worry. You are under my protection now.”

And CamCam — a globetrotting front-line journalist who, presumably, spent the past decade reporting from places like Sarajevo and Kigali — says, “Thank you,” secure in the knowledge that the United Nations secretary-general has promised to protect him.

Left Behind

Previous Post

January 20, 2009

Three prayers

Next Post

January 26, 2009 Abstinence education

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What happened to Jezebel as prophesied by Elijah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Drowned Burned alive Eaten by dogs Struck by lightning