Translating Huckabee

Last updated on: January 21, 2008 at 10:53 pm by Fred Clark

Translating Huckabee 2008-01-21T22:53:00-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Doing my best impression of Barbara Billingsley in Airplane: “Oh stewardess! I speak evangelical …”

Former White House speechwriter Michael Gerson was very skilled at peppering President George W. Bush’s public statements with so-called “dog whistle” language targeting evangelical Christian voters. These passing phrases and allusions wouldn’t alter or confuse Bush’s message to other listeners, but they would have an additional resonance for the evangelicals listening. The actual meaning of those phrases didn’t much matter, what was important was that he came across as conversant in the local idiom, the insider’s jargon.

To cite a famous example, when Bush said that he believed in the “wonder-working pow’r” of the American people, the message was simply that if Bush used that phrase he must know that song, so he must’ve sung that song, so he must’ve been to church, so he must be one of us. No one was supposed to, and few did, think too hard about the bizarre meaning of that statement — which seemed to equate the American people with “the precious blood of the lamb,” suggesting that we could, by rallying around our president, “be free from the burden of sin.” That (heretical, arrogant, insane) implication wasn’t the point of the allusion. The point was just to reassure evangelicals that he spoke their language, and was therefore on their side, without scaring off everyone else.

Unlike Bush, Mike Huckabee really is a native speaker of the evangelical idiom. He isn’t just parroting phrases spelled out phonetically for him by some Wheaton-alum speechwriter, he’s talking the way he naturally talks. The effect for evangelical voters is thus the same — they are reassured he is “one of us.” But the effect for everyone else is quite different, because unlike Bush’s dog whistles, everyone else can hear Huckabee’s allusions too and non-native speakers have a hard time making sense of what he’s saying.

To take a trivial example, Huckabee has on several occasions mentioned that he reads a chapter from Proverbs* every day and that he carries his New Testament with him for this purpose. The book of Proverbs, of course, is not in the New Testament, but evangelicals are all familiar with the Pocket Testament League’s tiny volumes, the size of a deck of cards, that include not just the 27 books of the New Testament but also the Psalms and Proverbs.** These editions were designed for convenience and not with the intent of dismissing the other 37 books of the Hebrew Scriptures as unimportant, although it’s worth noting that most American evangelicals wouldn’t notice if the prophets suddenly disappeared from their Bibles. (Evangelical reading tends to focus on Paul’s Epistles, Proverbs and pselected Psalms, which is also why Huckabee earns points for his frequent citations from Proverbs but Barack Obama gets none for quoting the book of Amos, as he did yesterday.)

More potentially confusing is Huckabee’s reference to “a living God.” He used this phrase in the comment we looked at earlier, in which the former Arkansas governor explicitly endorses theocracy. Here again is that comment, as reported by MSNBC:

“[Some of my opponents] do not want to change the Constitution, but I believe it’s a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God, and that’s what we need to do is to amend the Constitution so it’s in God’s standards rather than try to change God’s standards,” Huckabee said.

Over at Making Light, Avram Grumer has some fun with this juxtaposition of “living God” and talk of the Constitution. Since the idea of a “living Constitution” is often railed against by social conservatives who see it as a synonym for “anything goes,” Grumer wonders if this means Huckabee believes in an anything-goes God as well:

Wait, “the living god”? Wouldn’t that be some kinda wishy-washy progressive modernist God? I figured Huck for a strict constructionist God, an eye-for-an-eye guy who meant every word of Leviticus when he spake it. “Living God” implies some kind of dynamic, changing God, probably soft on crime, the kind of warm, fuzzy God from whom Words emanate with penumbrae.

In the ensuing discussion,*** Grumer writes, “I’m just amused by the fact that the adjective ‘living’ seems to imply diametrically opposite things when you apply it to ‘God’ or ‘Constitution.'”

That’s astute. The same could be said of the evangelical idiom “the living Word of God” as a reference to the Bible. “Living” there certainly doesn’t mean all the wanton things they take it to mean in the phrase “living Constitution.” But I don’t want to get bogged down in the legal and legalist lit-crit, what I’m interested in here is what this phrase “living God” means.

When a Southern Baptist preacher like Mike Huckabee speaks of “the living God,” what he means is that God is active, busy, involved in the world, even that God intervenes in the lives of people and the affairs of nations. That’s not in itself an unusual claim for us Christian types to make. I would probably disagree with Huckabee as to the extent and content and intent of that divine involvement, as well as over our capacity for understanding it (there’s that effing ineffability again), but I wouldn’t object to the use of the phrase “living God.” What it means, essentially, is that he is not a Deist.

I should caution, however, that I’m not entirely confident in my ability to translate Huckabee’s evangelical-speak because I’m not entirely confident that he isn’t using a different kind of dog whistle — one to which my evangelical ears are not attuned.

Bush’s dog-whistle code-words were designed to appeal to evangelical Christian voters without scaring away everyone else. Huckabee isn’t doing that — he employs evangelical idioms without any apparent regard for how it sounds to those unfamiliar with it. But Huckabee may also be employing his own set of vague allusions to appeal to a particular subset of evangelical types without scaring away the rest of the people in the pews. Over at Daily Kos, dogemperor makes the case that Huckabee admires Bill Gothard. Huckabee has even proudly noted that he has been through Gothard’s “Basic Seminar.”

Gothard is not well-known outside of his particular fiefdom, but Huckabee’s expressed admiration for him — and Gothard’s attendance at a Houston fundraiser for the candidate — is deeply disturbing. You know how, say, Christopher Hitchens gets a case of the howling fantods any time he hears anyone from the religious right speak? That’s how most evangelicals respond to Bill Gothard. At the fundamentalist Baptist, and very Republican****, church I grew up in Gothard’s seminars were often criticized as a “cult.”

It may simply be that, as a politician, Huckabee is willing to accept support from anyone who is willing to offer it. I haven’t heard any reports that Huckabee’s daughter has been ordered to remain single until age 30, after which she would be allowed to marry only with her father’s permission (yes, that really is something the Gothardites I’ve encountered believe), or any other indications that the former governor is truly a Gothard devotee. So his praise of Gothard and the Basic Seminar might just be a politician’s flattery — just as his praise for the World’s Worst Books after receiving Tim LaHaye’s endorsement might not mean he’s a full-blown prophecy maniac. But both of these instances give me pause. Huckabee talks like a run-of-the-mill evangelical, but if he’s really a fan of both LaHaye and Gothard, then he may be something very different and far more troublesome.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

* Many evangelicals seem to think that the division of Proverbs into 31 chapters was divinely inspired as a sign that we should read a chapter of this book every day. That entails skipping the final chapter five months out of the year — nothing against Lemuel, but hey, he’s no Solomon, you know? Contemporary evangelical piety might be a very different thing if the book of Ecclesiastes had also been divided into 31 chapters.

** I’ve kept one of these pocket-sized volumes in the glove compartment of my car ever since the day I found myself unexpectedly at a hospital bedside needing, but not having with me, the 23rd Psalm, and Psalm 139, and Romans 8, and 1 Corinthians 15. It turns out it’s also a good thing to keep in one’s glove compartment because troopers tend to look closely at everything you’re pulling out of there when they ask to see your registration and proof of insurance.

*** And thanks for the kind words and plugs.

**** Except for Cindy’s mom. But we kept an eye on her.

evangelicals

Previous Post

January 20, 2008

Super-Duper Tuesday

Next Post

January 22, 2008 Biblical names

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to Romans, how does faith come?

Select your answer to see how you score.

By hearing the word By reading Scripture From the Holy Spirit Through prayer