Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

Brave New Media 2

Last updated on: November 20, 2007 at 9:48 pm   by Fred Clark

Brave New Media 2 2007-11-20T21:48:14-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I should say, first off, that I like paying my rent and, you know, eating. These are Good Things in my book. And since my paycheck comes from Big Corporate Media — and specifically from online Big Corporate Media, and therefore from the ad revenue for online BCM — I don’t want to saw off the branch I’m sitting on by suggesting there shouldn’t be any such ads.

But since my livelihood is, in fact, staked on this kind of advertising, I also have a stake in seeing these ads done right. To me, that means ads that don’t unduly burden or confuse readers and that don’t alter or influence content. I’d also like to think that the creatures from Advertising Land who sell these ads aren’t deliberately swindling our advertisers, either — meaning that ads that charge per click shouldn’t be generating illegitimate clicks by deception or misdirection (a la The Bride of Clippy).

Embedded, in-text advertising seems to me to fail on every one of those points. Criticizing it isn’t a matter of “I wanna bite the hand that feeds me,” then, it’s a matter of making sure that this feeding is sustainable and not left “in the hands of such a lot of fools tryin’ to anaesthetize the way that you feel,” as it were.

When online BCM opts for the short-term revenue bump that these kinds of ads promise to provide, they’re being penny-wise and pound-foolish. Annoying readers is not a good way to increase traffic over the long run. Undermining the credibility of the news they provide diminishes the only product news organizations have to offer. And bilking advertisers with borderline click-fraud doesn’t seem likely to appeal to those advertisers in the long run either.

So there’s that.

But there’s another, separate reason that I find these in-text ads so infuriating.

Let me illustrate this with an example from today’s paper, in the nutrition column, “Americans are suckers for weight-loss scams.” After cautioning readers to be wary of diet fads and weight-loss schemes, the columnist suggests that they read more about this at the FTC’s consumer protection Web site. Here’s how that final paragraph appeared in the print edition of the column:

For tips on avoiding weight loss scams, visit the FTC’s Web site at www.ftc.gov. Click on “consumer protection,” then “consumer information.” Then, select “diet, health & fitness.”

That’s a bit clumsy and long-winded, but in print, in non-hyper-text, referring readers to URLs is necessarily clumsy and long-winded. (It might have been easier to tell readers to “visit www.ftc.gov/bcp/menus/consumer/health.shtm,” but the impulse to avoid longish URLs in print is a good one.)

One of the immensely frustrating things about the “New Media” sites of BCM is that you will see — online — paragraphs that look exactly like the one above from the print edition. You won’t find this awkward transposition of non-hypertext as hypertext anywhere on the Web except for these BCM sites, where shovelware is used to take chunks of printed material and dump it unceremoniously into Web templates. Even the laziest blogger (and I know from lazy bloggers) would never post something like the following:

Atrios has a good comment on this. To read what he has to say, visit the Web log (or “blog”)
Eschaton at http://atrios.blogspot.com and then scroll down to the entry titled “Wheeeeeeeeee.”

Yet exactly that sort of thing can be found, on a regular basis, on newspaper Web sites. It creates the impression that you’ve stumbled across a tourist struggling to speak the language with a slightly out-of-date phrasebook.

BCM are enamored of that phrase “New Media” when referring to online journalism, yet they have been bewilderingly slow to understand what’s really new about it. Words and pictures, after all, are not new media. Video and animation and most of the other we-can-so-we-should bells and whistles these sites offer aren’t really new kinds of media either. The Internet, they seem to think, provides a new way to broadcast these things, but broadcasting also is nothing new. Hypertext, though, that’s new. Without hypertext, the Web might as well be just a big old gopher site with lots of .pdf and .mov files. Come to think of it, that’s a pretty good description of how BCM seems to treat the Web.

Now, finally, we’re seeing actual links on newspaper sites, yet even though these links appear in the news stories, as part of those news stories, they’re not news links. They’re ads. So in addition to all of the reasons listed above for why these ads are unwise, annoying and at best borderline ethical there’s also this: In-text advertising creates a barrier to newspaper sites ever fully realizing the potential of hypertext links. Once such links become established as the domain of advertising, the presence of news links within stories can only add confusion.

For an example of this, look no further than the nutrition column linked above. The certified shovelware operator who dumped this column onto the Web is also, by day, a blogger and avid consumer of online news. As such, he found that long string of “go to … and then click … and then click” instructions unacceptable and replaced it with the following:

For tips on avoiding weight loss scams, visit the FTC’s consumer protection Web site on Diet, Health & Fitness.

Slightly more elegant and Web-appropriate, but here’s the problem: the column also contains multiple in-text advertising links. The word “health” links to an ad for Promise margarine. The words “consumer” and “money” link to this ad for Capital One. And the phrase “weight loss” links to a sponsored search results page (which, awkwardly, includes lots of links to exactly the kind of diet and weight-loss schemes that the columnist is warning against).

The in-text ad links have a slightly different appearance than the legitimate news-content link supplied by the columnist herself. The advertising links are underlined in green text. The news link is not underlined and it’s in blue text.

This is what the distinction between news content and advertising has come down to: the difference between blue and green. I suppose this is what they mean by “yellow journalism.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post



November 19, 2007

Brave New Media

Next Post



November 22, 2007 Happy Thanksgiving


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What miracle did Elijah perform for a widow at Zarephath?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fed 5,000 Cured leprosy Turned water to wine Multiplied flour and oil

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

Some obscure footnotes of white evangelical history

slacktivist

Family

The purpose-driven labor priest

slacktivist

Family

'A hermeneutical Pandora’s box'

slacktivist

Family

No, most white evangelicals are not 'egalitarian'

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Some obscure footnotes of white evangelical history

The Tallulah Bankhead photo will be explained below.

I came here freely, with neither garlic nor...

  A new installment of our short video-documentary series Becoming Brigham was...

It Is Written – Keeping An Account Of...

    Cast all your anxiety on him because he cares for...

Feeling Small, Examining Beliefs, and Getting Bigger

Feeling Small, Examining Beliefs, and Getting Bigger One of my grandfathers, nicknamed...

What the Guilty Taught Me, and What I...

Guest writer: Pilgrim. A Pilgrim at the Prison Table. Then the Lord...

Pope Leo: "I have Truly Felt Your Support."

Pope Leo walked out of the hospital on his own steam last...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube