Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Procedure 289712B

Procedure 289712B

Last updated on: November 15, 2007 at 6:00 pm by Fred Clark

Procedure 289712B 2007-11-15T18:00:40-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

If you haven’t already done so, please make your way to Right Behind and bow before the glory of the Legendary Write-Off. The instructions:

Write a manual or guide of no more than 500 and no less than 300 words describing the procedures involved in preparing a sandwich of your choice.

This is a competition and not merely an exhibition but still, please, no wagering.

* * * * * * * * *

The Billionaire Murders of 2010

Billionaire investor Warren Buffett, the third richest man in the world, testified yesterday at a Senate Finance Committee hearing on estate tax reform. Testify, brother Buffet, testify!:

Warren Buffett thinks those who use the phrase “death tax” are intellectually dishonest because the phrase in his words is “clever, Orwellian and dead wrong.”

The billionaire investor has been an outspoken critic of efforts to repeal the estate tax and in testimony at a Senate Finance Committee estate tax hearing on Wednesday, he told lawmakers that you’d have to attend 200 funerals to be at one where the family of the deceased would owe estate tax.

Buffett said if anything the estate tax is a “death present” because heirs figure their capital gains on inherited assets based on the price when they inherited them rather than when the decedent bought them. …

The intellectually dishonest Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the committee’s ranking Republican, responded by continuing to use the made-up and inaccurate phrase “death tax” throughout the hearing, thus demonstrating that he is “Orwellian and dead wrong,” but not particularly clever.

“I believe in keeping equality of opportunity,” said Buffett. “You don’t get to be a quarterback … because your father was a quarterback 20 years ago.”

Citing these comments from the world’s third-most-successful capitalist will inevitably result in comments below accusing Comrade Buffett of “socialism.” Please feel free to cut out the middle man and send those comments directly to his office at Berkshire Hathaway.

Regardless of one’s position on the merits or demerits of dynastic plutocracy, sane people on all sides of this issue can agree that the current situation is absurd:

Under current law, estates worth up to $2 million this year and next will be exempt from federal estate tax, and portions of an estate above that amount would be taxed at 45 percent.

By 2009, the exemption level rises to $3.5 million, and by 2010 the estate tax will be repealed for one year.

Come 2011, the tax will be reinstated, with an exemption level of $1 million and a top rate of 55 percent.

This suggests — no, requires — a movie to be made. A black comedy set in 2010, perhaps incorporating the quasi-documentary style of the E! television “reality” shows featuring heiresses and heirs desperate to trade wealth for fame. The plot would, of course, involve a rash of suspicious accidents taking the lives of multi-millionaires, resulting in a tax-free windfall for their unconvincingly grieving children. I picture a suspenseful big finale set at a New Year’s Eve party in a Manhattan penthouse. (As a kind of meta-joke, you could cast Paris Hilton to play a Paris Hilton-type in the movie, but I’m not confident she has the acting range to pull it off.)

On the other hand, the crazy-quilt of year-by-year changes in the estate tax between now and 2010 also provides a potentially useful framework for studying the effect of these changes on charitable giving. Here’s hoping the folks at Independent Sector are tracking this.

* * * * * * * * *

The Center for Responsible Lending has been looking at the potential consequences of the Subprime Spillover. Lorainne Mirabella and Jamie Smith Hopkins of The Sun summarize their findings in “Ripple effect is feared from foreclosures“:

The center’s report estimates about a third of homes nationwide — or 44.5 million homes — will see property values drop by an average $5,000 two to three years after the foreclosures of loans originated in 2005 or 2006. It estimates the total loss at $223 billion. …

So here’s another question: If post-bubble or post-subprime mess property values do, indeed, drop by something like $200+ billion, what will that mean for school districts dependent on those property values for the tax base that funds their budgets? It seems likely that quite a few art and music teachers could wind up joining former Merrill Lynch CEO Stan O’Neal in the unemployment line.

* * * * * * * * *

Homework blegging

Speaking of science that a layperson (or, at least, this layperson) can’t easily follow, it was somewhat encouraging to read the following, from the Wikipedia entry on Barbara McClintock:

Her work on controlling elements and gene regulation was conceptually difficult and was not immediately understood or accepted by her contemporaries.

Nor was it immediately understood by this blogger when called upon to try to explain it for his girlfriend’s seventh-grade daughter. Barbara McClintock was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1983 “for her discovery of mobile genetic elements.”

“What does that mean?” I am asked. Ah, hmm. Well.

The good news is that her report is not due until after Thanksgiving, so I still have time to appeal to the hive-mind of the blogosphere for a way of explaining McClintock’s contributions to science in simple language that even a seventh grader and/or a journalist/theology student/blogger can understand.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 14, 2007

Who do you trust? (pt. 1)

Next Post

November 16, 2007 Malibu-Mansion

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In James, what is the correct sequence that leads from temptation to death?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Temptation, desire, death, judgment Desire, sin conceived, sin full-grown, death Desire, temptation, sin, death Sin, desire, full-grown sin, death