Gay-Hatin’ Gospel (pt. 6)

Last updated on: November 5, 2007 at 10:14 am by Fred Clark

Gay-Hatin’ Gospel (pt. 6) 2007-11-05T10:14:39-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve been asked to revisit the backlash theory, giving more weight to the perceived seriousness of the threat. In doing so, it has been suggested, I should also revisit the demagogue theory, giving more consideration to the possibility that there really are barbarians at the gate — big, gay, fabulous barbarians, apparently.

Those who have asked me to reconsider this — in a series of e-mails that included some which were quite civil — seem to think I’ve been going about this question all wrong. They don’t deny the accuracy of the recent findings from the Barna Group —

The most common perception is that present-day Christianity is “anti-homosexual.” Overall, 91 percent of young non-Christians and 80 percent of young churchgoers say this phrase describes Christianity. As the research probed this perception, non-Christians and Christians explained that beyond their recognition that Christians oppose homosexuality, they believe that Christians show excessive contempt and unloving attitudes towards gays and lesbians. One of the most frequent criticisms of young Christians was that they believe the church has made homosexuality a “bigger sin” than anything else.

— but they see this alteration in the very identity of American Christianity as the legitimate and necessary response to a very real life-or-death struggle over the meaning of Christianity and America. To get a sense of how they view this threat, let’s turn again to G.K. Chesterton’s mind-bending thriller The Man Who Was Thursday. Chesterton’s ultra-anarchist, Gregory, explains his true aim:

“To abolish God!” said Gregory, opening the eyes of a fanatic. “We do not only want to upset a few despotisms and police regulations; that sort of anarchism does exist, but it is a mere branch of the Nonconformists. We dig deeper and we blow you higher. We wish to deny all those arbitrary distinctions of vice and virtue, honor and treachery, upon which mere rebels base themselves. The silly sentimentalists of the French Revolution talked of the Rights of Man! We hate Rights and we hate Wrongs. We have abolished Right and Wrong.”

Proponents of the backlash theory believe that this is exactly what is at stake in their effort to reinforce legal, moral and cultural condemnations of homosexuality. They may not all believe that this “radical homosexual agenda” is motivated by Gregory’s deep hatred for society, but they believe the consequences of this agenda succeeding would be the same. If homosexuals are accorded legal equality and cultural acceptance, or even tolerance, then, according to this view, every distinction between vice and virtue, between right and wrong, will melt away, the Bible, religion, morality and the rule of law will lose all meaning and society will crash to the ground like a kite without a string.

Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together — mass hysteria.

They really believe this.

Pam Spaulding highlights a WorldNetDaily post from J. Matt Barber titled “Homosexuality: What’s all the fuss?” that lays this out clearly (or at least as as clearly as Barber’s prose allows). Barber starts with the “they started it” claim of the innocent backlash theory, but quickly works himself up into a Stage 4 case of exegetical panic:

Unlike the sin of homosexuality … other sins … do not have the benefit of a tremendously powerful and prosperous lobby that is blindly supported by people in positions of political influence, and other leftists in media and elsewhere who have been duped by the crafty and disingenuous rhetoric of “tolerance” and “diversity.” Proponents, practitioners and enablers of homosexual sin demand that we all renounce God’s express condemnation of such conduct and embrace this spiritually and physically destructive behavior as virtuous — as a wholly equal, alternative sexual “orientation.” …

And so, fervent and relentless homosexual propaganda goose-steps along, trampling upon those who observe traditional notions of sexual morality. This sets homosexual sin worlds apart from the other sins you reference. Therefore, we Christians are left no choice but to assign homosexual sin significance commensurate with that which it demands.

Thus we find ourselves — back against the ropes — in a fight we did not pick, struggling in a culture war we did not ask for. It’s a clash of worldviews in a zero-sum-game. Make no mistake; the sin of homosexuality is the bunker-buster bomb in this war against morality.

The very firm response by defenders of biblical truth …

As Barber grows firmer in response to this struggle, let’s try to remember that sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes a massive penetrating weapon that thrusts deep before exploding is just a bunker-buster bomb.

I would say that Barber is confusing the categories of ethics, morality and the law, but that gives him too much credit. He does not accept that these are separate categories. For Barber, all that is immoral must also be illegal, and all that is legal is explicitly endorsed. This is the logic of Prohibition. It is also the logic of Blue Laws and adultery statutes. In a different cultural and religious context — but an identical spiritual context — it is the logic of the Taliban.

Those of us from the Baptist tradition of religious liberty cannot help but be embarrassed for Barber because we recognize this for what it is: a confession of a frail and flimsy faith and of a moral character that is wholly dependent on external crutches. Barber argues, explicitly, that his understanding of right and wrong cannot be sustained without the active support of the state, the courts, the police. (“Lord I believe. Help thou Caesar my unbelief!”) Take away legal prohibitions to homosexuality, he says, and morality itself is destroyed. Thus for Barber it is wholly appropriate and necessary to reinvent the meaning of Christianity in just the strange way that Barna shows it has been reinvented. That is the only way to ensure victory in the “culture war”/”clash of worldviews”/”war against morality.”

The tragic irony here is that for all of his obsession with being a culture warrior, Barber has himself been wholly assimilated by the spirit of the age. Christianity, he says, is at war — and that means Christians must do whatever it takes to win. Even if that means fundamentally altering your character. Even if it means demoting, disregarding or dismissing the texts that tell you who you are in favor of new approaches that contradict them. Whatever it takes to win. Yes or No — do you want to win the culture war? Yes or No?

Sound familiar? He didn’t get that idea from the Bible. The Gospel According to Cheney isn’t in the Bible.

Earlier we discussed what I called the inner-demons theory — the dynamic demonstrated by the seemingly endless parade of closeted, self-loathing homosexuals desperately clinging to a vehemently anti-gay agenda in the hopes that they can fake it ’til they make it as heterosexuals. Despite the Freudian minefield of his rhetoric, I don’t think J. Matt is that kind of closet-case. I think, rather, that he is a closeted, self-loathing nihilist, desperately clinging to a vehemently anti-gay agenda in the hopes that he can fake it ’til he makes it as a religious believer.

evangelicals

Previous Post

November 4, 2007

Some housekeeping

Next Post

November 6, 2007 The Stupid Brigade

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What metaphor is often used for the righteous in Psalms and Proverbs?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A mountain A river A sun A tree