Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Alternate endings

Alternate endings

Last updated on: July 16, 2007 at 8:04 pm by Fred Clark

Alternate endings 2007-07-16T20:04:02-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Years ago I was doing Bad Dinner Theater. The “play,” which was really just an extended sketch, was billed as a murder-mystery-comedy. It was cheesy, but fun.

I was in a handful of performances, all in banquet halls with no sets or scenery. For $35 a night, I played “The Great Somnambulo, hypnotist extraordinaire,” one of a half-dozen suspects, all of whom were performers in a 1950s Catskills night club talent show. That setting seemed authentic because the jokes all dated back to 1950s Catskills night clubs too.

We’d perform the first act set-up while the audience had a few rounds of pre-dinner cocktails, establishing that we all had a motive for killing the surly night-club manager, who was found dead just as the salads — and another round of cocktails — were being served. As the audience enjoyed their choice of chicken cordon bleu or prime rib — and, ideally, even more cocktails — we worked the tables, improvising responses to their questions as they tried to figure out which of us was the guilty party. Then during dessert, the audience would vote on the killer’s identity and, based on their choice, we would perform one of six possible finales, all of which included arbitrary comic twists and revelations, a la Murder by Death or Clue.

These alternative endings worked because our story wasn’t really much of a story, and because the broad types we were playing weren’t really characters (and, mainly, because our audience was buzzed from all those cocktails).

I was reminded of those days this weekend while watching The Sixth Sense on TNT.

***Spoiler Alert***

There’s no way to discuss what I’m about to discuss without spoiling the endings of Sixth Sense and Casablanca. Both films have famous twist endings, and I wouldn’t want to spoil that experience for any readers here who haven’t seen them, so just in case you haven’t, go watch them now. (Seriously. You’ll thank me later.) And then come back and read the section below.

M. Night Shyamalan has attempted several times to recapture the success of his break-out film with more twist-endings in Signs and The Village. Those came across as a bit gimmicky, and his reputation has faltered as a result, but that doesn’t change the fact that Sixth Sense is a masterful piece of storytelling, brilliantly conveyed by the director, his three stars, and a supporting cast of some of Philadelphia’s finest regional actors.

The first time you watch it, you’re taken in by Shyamalan’s well-crafted surprise. The story is told from Bruce Willis’ point of view and the viewer, like Willis, is unaware of the full gravity of his condition. So on that first viewing, you share his limited, inaccurate understanding of what it is you’re seeing.

On the second viewing, it’s difficult to do much more than check to see if Shyamalan & Co. were playing fair. You watch Sixth Sense the second time looking over the director’s shoulder, double-checking for continuity and consistency to confirm that this revelatory ending really holds up. And it does.

But it’s after that, on later viewings, that you really begin to appreciate the meaning of the story you’re being told. In these later viewings, you know what Haley Joel Osment knows, and you begin to see the story from his point of view, which is a very different story and a much richer one. It is no longer the story of a scared little boy and his frightened mother, and of the psychiatrist who tries to help them. It is now the story of a little boy who, with real courage and at great cost to himself, does whatever he can to protect his mother and to help his ghostly friend.

TNT, as always, interrupted this story with long and frequent commercial breaks, each of which this weekend seemed to include an ad for the DVD release of the Sandra Bullock thriller Premonition. The DVD, we’re told, includes among its bonus materials an “alternate ending” for the story.

That’s what got me to thinking again about my experience in Bad Dinner Theater. Our play could have multiple alternate endings to the story only because it wasn’t really much of a story — any arbitrary ending would be equally meaningful. Does the possibility of “alternate endings” for the story in Premonition suggest that this film is also, like our sketch, arbitrary and meaningless?

Considering that question while watching Sixth Sense, I began to appreciate that for all the talk of Shyamalan’s “twist ending,” his story ended the only way it could have ended. Or, at least, if it had ended any differently, it would have become a different story. The twist at the end is not a matter of the story taking a sudden turn, or making a sudden break. It is surprising because it suddenly reveals the nature of the story we’ve been seeing all along. That story could not be true to itself and end any other way.

So that got me to thinking about whether this is a general rule, whether it’s possible for a good movie — a good story — to allow alternate endings. A bit of delightful nonsense, like Clue, doesn’t strike me as a valid counter-example, since storytelling isn’t really the point of a movie like that one. But then I thought of Casablanca, one of the greatest pieces of cinematic storytelling ever produced, and its famously chaotic and ambiguous production.

While Casablanca was filming, no one — not Ingrid Bergman, not even the writers, Julius and Philip Epstein and Howard Koch — knew how the story would end, whether Ilsa would fly away with Victor Laszlo or with Rick. That uncertainty led to difficulties on the set, but it also helped to produce some of the film’s fine performances (watch Bergman again in the scene in Rick’s apartment).

Casablanca, we’re told, could have ended differently. But it could not have ended differently and still have been Casablanca. The movie ends the only way it could — the ending flows from all that went before it. As Bogey says, “It all adds up to one thing: You’re getting on that plane with Victor where you belong.”

An alternate ending might be imaginable, but it would force us to reinterpret everything else in the story. An alternate ending would create an alternate story — one in which, as with Sixth Sense, the hero would be someone else (Laszlo, perhaps, but certainly not Rick).

The ending of a story is inextricably tied up with the rest of it. It flows from what precedes it, but it also shapes and reshapes everything that precedes it. The ending of a story can tell us what the story means — it can give meaning to all that precedes it.

This, I think, is the function of much apocalyptic literature. John’s Apocalypse is an attempt to provide an alternate ending, an ending that would reshape and reinterpret all that came before it, giving it new meaning. This is a surprise twist, a “revelation,” like in Sixth Sense or Casablanca — an ending that suggests the story we’ve been seeing isn’t what we thought it was, and the heroes are not who we thought they were.

Real life, of course, is not a story. It’s full of extraneous, messy details that rarely “add up to one thing.” It’s twists and turns can be as arbitrary and meaningless as those in Bad Dinner Theater. John the Revelator knew this too. He and his fellow believers had seen too much of arbitrary suffering and death to find any comfort from a Hollywood ending that claimed life was fair, or virtue was rewarded, or justice wins out in the end and “No one ever dies and everybody lives happily ever after.” So he set his alternate ending later, afterward, after life, in an eschatological epilogue — an ending that asserted his unproven and unprovable claim that our lives are part of a story that means something.

But enough with the theologizing, let’s get back to the movies.

Alternate endings don’t always wind up as DVD extras, sometimes they get released to theaters. We hear about this all the time — a movie fails to impress test audiences, so they rewrite and reshoot the ending. In some few cases, this can work out, but this has nothing to do with whether or not the ending is “happy” or uplifting. Audiences can usually tell when they’re being lied to, when a storyteller is cheating. Sometimes a test audience will recognize this, rejecting an ending that doesn’t fit, that doesn’t make sense, that doesn’t follow what went before. In such cases, the reshot ending may be a necessary and superior correction.

Usually, though, these rewritten endings are themselves untrue. They’re tacked-on, artificial happy endings that reinterpret the stories being told in ways that the stories themselves will not allow. (The whole of apocalyptic literature — from John’s Apocalypse up through reggae classics like “Downpresser Man” — might also constitute nothing more than this kind of artificial rewrite, but it’s too soon to tell.)

My favorite example of this is Ben Stiller’s Cable Guy, a movie with a tacked-on ending that doesn’t seem to add up to one thing. The only way for that story to end would have been with Matthew Broderick in jail, framed by Jim Carrey for the murder of his girlfriend. But Stiller, or the test audiences, or Carrey, or all three, balked, opting instead for an incoherent, ill-fitting “happy ending.” Feel free to share your favorite examples in comments.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 11, 2007

You're not the pope of me

Next Post

July 17, 2007 Origins of the God Gap

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to Paul, what is the "root of all kinds of evil"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The love of money Worry Fear of God Love of learning