Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

Harnessing teachers’ greed

Last updated on: March 12, 2007 at 2:20 pm   by Fred Clark

Harnessing teachers’ greed 2007-03-12T14:20:18-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Article in the paper today looks at the popular notion of "performance-based pay" for teachers: "Incentive-based teacher pay unproven."

This is from a series of articles exploring the recommendations of something called "Vision 2015" — an ambitious school-reform plan that aims to turn Delaware's schools into the "best in the world" giving students the best education anywhere, ever. Plus a pony. A magical pony. Or something like that.

The plan's goals are laudable, but it seems a bit quixotic. It reminds me of that Rob Lowe-as-Sam Seaborn speech from The West Wing:

Education is the silver bullet. Education is everything. We don't need little changes, we need gigantic changes. Schools should be palaces. The competition for the best teachers should be fierce. They should be making six-figure salaries. Schools should be incredibly expensive for government and absolutely free of charge to its citizens, just like national defense. That's my position. I just haven't figured out how to do it yet.

Generally speaking, I like ambitious, quixotic plans and grand aspirations. But I also generally think that if you're proposing a multi-billion dollar plan you need to A) make sure that each of those billions of dollars is necessary, and B) have at least a general notion of where that money is coming from beyond vague exhortations about "priorities."

I'm skeptical of the Vision 2015 enterprise for other reasons as well. It's advocates don't seem to understand the meaning of comparative advantage. Thus they repeatedly insist that all children should be above average. And they point to the higher earning potential of college graduates as evidence that everyone could be earning as much if everyone went to college. That emphasis on earning potential and ensuring a well-prepared "work force" is another reason I'm suspicious of letting these folks define educational quality. (American schools, they seem to be saying, are still not Prussian enough,)

Today's article looks at the plan's idea of "performance-based pay" for teachers:

In most industries, employees who excel in their work are rewarded with raises or promotions. Those not succeeding don't advance.

Education shouldn't be any different, argue the school, business and community leaders behind the Vision 2015 plan.

As part of their plan to revamp Delaware's "mediocre" school system into a world leader by 2015, they want to see teachers paid based on their work — rewarding those who succeed while holding all accountable for student learning.

That's a change from the standard practice of linking teacher pay increases most closely to years of experience and education level, which critics say offers teachers incentive to stay another year, but not to do their jobs better.

The premise here is dubious. The annual raises that most employees receive are based more on keeping up with (or almost keeping up with) inflation, or on companywide profit, than on whether or not individuals "excel in their work."

There are practical reasons for this. Despite the appeal of the idea of linking pay to performance, most of us don't work in fields where such performance is easily measured. For salesmen, pundits and baseball players,* perhaps, it makes sense, but in most professions, the attempt to create such measurements is corrosive, resulting in financial incentives to "game the stats." This was a major theme in season four of The Wire** — which offered a relentless, gut-wrenching argument against the idea of such "performance-based pay" for teachers or police officers.

(One also wonders what is meant by the idea of rewarding teachers with "promotions." Mrs. Jones is an excellent fifth-grade teacher, so what then? She should be promoted to sixth-grade? Or to senior administrative vice president for fifth-grade?)

Advocates of performance-based pay for teachers invariably wind up measuring such "performance" by students' scores on standardized tests. Teachers are thus put on notice: Teach to the test or suffer financially. If you think that the biggest problem with American schools is that students are being insufficiently coached for standardized tests, then you might think this solves the problem. If, like me, you think that an obsession with test scores is detrimental to quality education, then you've only exacerbated the problem.

The push for "incentive-based teacher pay" is based on some other dubious assumptions as well, such as that teacher's unions are opposed to the well-being of students and that teachers are driven largely by profit motive ("I came to Casablanca for the waters …"). Those assumptions need to be explored and evaluated explicitly before school districts decide to act on them.

For today though, kudos to reporter Alison Kepner and the paper for being willing to ask whether or not there's evidence that this popular "reform" would actually improve anything.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

* Even in these examples there is the difficulty of accounting for variables beyond the control of the individual worker. Runs-batted-in are a useful measurement of a hitter's effectiveness, which is why the Phillies years ago acquired 100-RBI man Tommy Herr from the Cardinals. What they failed to notice was that in St. Louis, Herr was batting behind record-setting base-stealer Vince Coleman, and that it's not that hard to drive in runs when there's a speed-demon on third every other time you're up. Expecting Herr to produce the same numbers batting behind someone who didn't steal 110 bases was foolish, but no more foolish than pretending that parents are irrelevant to students' performance.

** Just watch it. All of it. Start with Season 1, Episode 1 and go from there. Then come back and thank me.

class warfare

Previous Post



March 10, 2007

The over/under

Next Post



March 13, 2007 The best lack all conviction


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group is known for door-to-door evangelism?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Pentecostals Catholics Jehovah’s Witnesses Baptists

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

Honk and holler as we go

slacktivist

Family

Bad Bosses are not beloved

slacktivist

Family

Complaint department

slacktivist

Family

Postcards from America (02.05.25)

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Jesus and the Law of Moses: An Interview...

It is my pleasure to interview Paul Sloan on his recent book,...

How Does Ặnāvâ Connect Katie Zacharia & Georgia?

This weekend, the big news has been the sudden departure of Trump’s...

The Woman We Remember by Her Wound

Śūrpaṇakhā Had a Heart Desire, humiliation, and the woman behind a turning...

6 Ways to Promote a Healthy Relationship

Karen, 42, and Kevin, 41, have been married for ten years and...

Jad Gillies on New Hillsong Worship Songs and...

For worship leader Jad Gillies, Hillsong Worship’s next chapter is not about...

Looking at the Largest Orthodox Cathedral on Earth

  There is often a considerable amount of anger and, shall we...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube