Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Loose Ends

Loose Ends

Last updated on: February 9, 2006 at 12:37 am by Fred Clark

15 Comments

Loose Ends 2006-02-09T00:37:00-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I've always liked this quote from slain missionary Jim Elliott:

"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose."

First read that in the Spire Comics version of Through Gates of Splendor. (And I really thought I remembered a Billy Graham film of this story, but apparently not.) That story was retold in the documentary Beyond the Gates of Splendor and is being retold again in the new feature film End of the Spear.

You may have heard about this movie because, yes, some evangelical Christians are boycotting it.

That's right: a movie that respectfully portrays the story of heroic evangelical Christian missionary martyrs and of their families' astonishingly brave and loving response to their deaths is being boycotted by evangelical Christians.

Why the boycott? Because the actor playing the dual role of missionaries Nate and Steve Saint, is gay. And this matters because … well, despite all their agitating, I'm not really sure why these people think this matters. On the one hand, they seem to claim that the actor, Chad Allen deceived them by not announcing, at the start of his audition, that he was gay (apparently since he was once on Dr. Quinn — which airs in reruns on PAX, they figured he was "safe"). On the other hand, they claim that their problem isn't simply that he's gay, but that he's openly and outspokenly an advocate for "gay causes." These don't seem to be two things you can be upset about at the same time.

The irony here, if reviews of the movie are to be trusted, is that Allen is apparently pretty good as Nate/Steve Saint. The rest of the film, however, and particularly it's over-the-top orchestral score, has been widely criticized as melodramatic and, yes, campy. Chad Allen is fine, the critics say, and the story itself is inspiring, but director Jim Hanon is way too much of a drama queen.

Update: Some interesting comments on the movie from Steve Saint at Belief.net. See here and here.

* * * * * * * * *

This. Trick. Doesn't. Work. With. Prepositions.

I kind of like the whole periods-after-every-word-for-emphasis thing that's all the rage among those crazy kids on the Internets these days. Like any device, it can get weary from overuse, but when applied sparingly this can be effective.

The reason it works, I think, is because it imitates the cadence of emphatic speech. Tone of voice is notoriously difficult to convey in e-mail — not because it's impossible to convey in writing, but because it's difficult to convey in hasty writing. Shorthand devices like this — or like my own abuse/overuse of italics — can therefore be useful.

But there are still rules for how this trick works and doesn't work. Since it's imitative of speech, a good rule of thumb is to say it out loud. If it sounds wrong, it probably is. Consider, for example, this recent post in comments:

"Most. Simplistic. Ill-informed. Comments. On. Christian. Theology. Ever."

This usage gets a couple of things right, such as the "Most. … Ever." construction. (This trick lends itself particularly well to an exasperated or celebratory superlative.) But it ultimately doesn't work.

The sentence is too long to sound natural in this kind of rat-a-tat spondaic structure. The preposition, in particular, can't really bear the strain of standing on its own as an emphatic, one-word sentence. The insertion of such a qualifying prepositional phrase ("on Christian theology") mutes the intended superlative force of the most … ever structure. But more important, it trips up the rhythm of the meta-sentence.

Again, when in doubt, read it out loud. Rat-a-tat works. So does rat-a-tat-tat. Rat-a-a-tat doesn't.

* * * * * * * * *

"I have to say my all-time favorite book is Johnny Cash's autobiography 'Cash' by Johnny Cash."

And I have to say my all-time favorite Spire Comic is this one.

Coolest. Christian. Comic. Ever.

* * * * * * * * *

"Do you work for the clown, or does the clown work for you?"

Quick Change comes out on DVD on Feb. 14.

What could be more romantic than the perfect bank robbery?

* * * * * * * * *

Hautboys. Enter.

Semi-related to the comments above. In "Writing in Restaurants," David Mamet writes:

A lesson from radio: don't write stage directions. If it is not apparent what the character is trying to accomplish by saying the line, telling us how the character said it, or whether or not she moved to the couch isn't going to aid the case. We might understand better what the character means but we aren't particularly going to care.

* * * * * * * * *

Don't you like American music baby?

So I got my copy of "Some Other Place," the new CD from Whisperado — a.k.a. in blogging circles as Patrick Nielsen Hayden's band.

I could mention here, again, that it rocks. Or that the song "Black and Blue" works equally well whether or not you take the ass-kicking metaphorically. Or that if I were writing a story and wanted a great name and location for an indie-rock record label, I only wish I could come up with something as good as "Bagel & Rat Records" on Flatbush Avenue.

But I'll skip all that and just tell you to get yourself a copy and hear for yourself.

* * * * * * * * *

Why I am frightened by the moon.

Speaking of music I like from people I admire (and music I admire from people I like), allow me to introduce you to Charlie or, to use the name he's podcasting with these days, King Bonk.

Chuck's a great songwriter, and now he's trying something else with these podcasts — something from the Joe Frank/Jean Shepherd part of the storytelling universe.

So this brings me to the subject of why I'm frightened by the moon. When I was young we used to fear the impending event known in some Christian circles as "the Rapture" …

Good stuff.

* * * * * * * * *

The servants of evil win. Again.

One final note on Spire Comics and the Superbowl. Remembering my evangelical Christian childhood in the 1970s, it was quite odd to read the culture warriors of American conservatism siding with the Pittsburgh Steelers as the avatars of blue-collar, red-state, red-blooded Americanism.

This isn't terribly accurate, of course, as Ezra Klein points out. And in any case Pittsburgh is a blue city in a blue state.

But the point here, as any American evangelical who remembers the 1970s could tell you, is that the Pittsburgh Steelers are Satan's team. These black-clad evildoers were the antithesis of God's team — the pious Dallas Cowboys of Tom Landry and Roger Staubach.

Staubach praised God and gave his Christian testimony after games. He spoke at Fellowship of Christian Athletes events and was held up as a role model. The Steelers, on the other hand, had Terry Bradshaw. It was very clear whose side God was on. It couldn't have been clearer if the coach's wife and daughter had missed the big game for a mission trip to the Congo.

But then, in Superbowl X and, unbelievably, again in Superbowl XIII, God's team lost to the Pittsburgh Steelers. This prompted a crisis in faith for some evangelicals, and convinced others that the End Times were at hand.

I wouldn't be surprised if the lingering after-effects of this shocking triumph of the forces of darkness wound up figuring in Pennsylvania's upcoming governor's race. It won't matter in Pittsburgh, where Lynn Swann is a hero. And it won't matter in Philly, where beating Dallas is always a good thing. But in central Pennsyltucky — the red part of the state that's crucial to Swann's electoral hopes — evangelicals may remember the cruel downfall of God's team, and that Swann was once a servant of evil.

(The Spire Comics images posted here are all borrowed from Mile High Comics — America's Largest Comics Dealer.)

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 7, 2006

"Don't call anyone unclean that God has made clean"

Next Post

February 9, 2006 Deliberate mendacity

Recent Comments

15 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Three of the four beasts from Daniel's vision are: a bear with three ribs in its mouth, a leopard with four wings and four heads, and a terrifying beast with iron teeth and ten horns. Which beast is missing?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A lion with eagle's wings A ram with two sets of gilded horns A bull breathing fire A dragon with seven heads