BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
- Home
- Progressive Christian
- There are many copies
There are many copies
Last updated on: September 20, 2005 at 12:15 am by Fred Clark
There are many copies 2005-09-20T00:15:18-04:00 Fred Clark
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
(And they have a plan.)
Atrios points us to this U.S. News "Whispers" item, which helps to explain the precise process that leads to all those GOP pundits uttering the same, exact talking points. They're just following orders. It's called the "Friends & Allies" program:
The project, started by the Republican National Committee in the 2004 re-election campaign, is simple and effective: Give opinion makers, media friends, and even cocktail party hosts insider info on the topic of the day. How? Through E-mailed talking points, called D.C. Talkers, and conference calls.
"Message discipline" is one thing, but Republican pundits are starting to sound like the hypnotized audience members exiting "The Amazing Alexander" show in that old SNL skit ("It was better than cats. I'd see it again and again …"). Having everyone saying the same thing in the same words makes the propaganda so artlessly transparent.
Part of my complaint here, I suppose, is aesthetic. Propaganda may be the lowest form of art, but it's still supposed to be art.
Once Karl Rove demonstrated that blatant manipulation of the press and bald-faced lying were just as effective as subtler forms of deception, then it seems everyone just stopped trying. There used to be at least some artistry to it. The parade of conservative and slightly less-conservative pundits on CNN and MSNBC was like jazz. An official spokesperson would sing the main theme, then all the unofficial spokespersons would offer their variations on it. Now there is no variation. There's just theme, theme, theme, theme, theme. (See, for example, the recent enthusiasm for the phrase "blame game>.")
My main complaint, though, is with journalists — particularly those on TV. Of course, expecting TV journalists to be anything other than naive and gullible is probably, itself, naive and gullible. But still — when pundits just blatantly parrot the same lines verbatim, knowing they'll never get called on it, it's hard to see that as anything other than an expression of utter contempt for TV journalists. You'd think they'd at least be insulted into responding.
I'm a fan of the BBC's interviewers for the way they aggressively refuse to let their subjects sidestep a question. They're not afraid to call bullshit when some official, "friend" or "ally" tries to get away with just parroting the official talking points. That's because the BBC interviewers are, you know, journalists. The same cannot be said for the entertainers who read the news on American television. They're in show business, so maybe they should adapt a show-biz response to the unimaginative exploitation of their airtime being committed by pundits who merely regurgitate the "Friends & Allies" talking points.
If I were a producer on, say, "Hardball," I'd get a hold of one of those old Groucho-duck puppets from "You Bet Your Life." Whenever a guest started repeating the same, exact line from "D.C. Talkers" that the previous guest used, the duck would drop down from the ceiling in a rain of confetti, holding a sign reading "The Blame-Game" (or whatever that day's particular magic words happened to be). Chris Matthews would then push the button (I'd have installed one of those giant red prop-buttons on his desk) and the guest's chair would whoosh out of the studio (oh, and I'd also have installed one of those Broadway-style automated set-change track systems).
Maybe that's a little too elaborate, but I bet ratings would go up. And it'd beat the current practice at "Hardball" — responding to blatant media manipulation with a hearty "Thank you, sir. May I have another?"
Previous Post

September 19, 2005
Terror-bait
Next Post

September 21, 2005 "There's always room"
Recent Comments
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized
Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
What does "Ebenezer" mean, as in the stone Samuel set up?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Stone of God Stone of help Stone of Law Stone of David
Related posts from slacktivist
The purpose-driven labor priest
'A hermeneutical Pandora’s box'
No, most white evangelicals are not 'egalitarian'
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
Pope Leo: "I have Truly Felt Your Support."
Pope Leo walked out of the hospital on his own steam last...
Election Day With Amos: 3 Lessons for Christian...
What can the prophet Amos teach Christians about Election Day? Nearly 2,800...
Adventurous Lectionary - Pentecost 22 - October 25,...
PENTECOST 22 The Adventurous Lectionary – October 25, 2026 - Pentecost 22...
Everything: Learning Hip Hop Theomusicology from Lauryn Hill
"My hold things; they have not distinguished between the hold and unhold,...
The limits of indoctrination. Techs think AI will cure cancer, so smoking...
'You Can See Everything': A Film Without a...
If you're looking to find the hero in the strange and riveting...
view all Progressive Christian blogs
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
Comments are closed.
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In











