Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Notepad

Notepad

Last updated on: July 20, 2005 at 12:14 pm by Fred Clark

69 Comments

Notepad 2005-07-20T12:14:31-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Normal blogging can resume now that I've finished the mandatory annual training on avoiding sexual harassment. (link via Making Light)

* * * * * * * * *

Topic No. 1 for political bloggers today will of course be President Bush's announcement of his nominee to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court. I don't know much about the guy, but let me just say that I don't think that a man who sold his soul to the devil down at the crossroads really deserves to be considered for a lifetime appointment to the highest …

[Emily Litella]What's that? Oh, that's different. Never mind.[/Emily Litella]

* * * * * * * * *

This weekend, I avoided political controversy at the box office by going to see Charlie and the Chocolate Factory because a little nonsense now and then is cherished by the wisest men.

This was another of those Tim Burton movies that seemed more fun to look at than to actually watch. Johnny Depp is, as usual, brilliant, although you end up pitying his demented Willy Wonka more than liking him. (And what is is about Burton that makes him enjoy taking beautiful people like Depp and Helena Bonham Carter and making them look so hideous?)

This Wonka never says anything about being the music makers and the dreamers of dreams. And there's no "Good day sir!" And it's a bit odd hearing the Oingo Boingo reunion tour performed by a bunch of CGI oompa loompas.

But at least by going to see the latest version of this classic children's story, I managed to avoid exposing myself to more conservative whining about "liberal Hollywood." More or less.

* * * * * * * * *

Been toying with the idea of canceling my landline phone. I hardly use the thing anymore, but I'm still sending Verizon quite a bit of money every month for … for … well, I'm not really sure for what anymore.

Anybody done this already? What are the downsides?

* * * * * * * * *

Seriously, as of 11:30 this morning, I know relatively little about Judge John Roberts, the man President Bush has nominated to serve on the Supreme Court. I'm sure that over the coming days we'll all learn more about him, and we'll all have more to say then.

For now, though, a word about abortion, or more specifically, about the politics of abortion. Or, even more specifically, about the way battles over the nomination of judges seems to be in large measure driven by the politics of abortion.

Johnson is Bush's pick and early reports say that he is a "staunch conservative" on "social issues." That's to be expected. But what kind of staunch conservative?

I live in Pennsylvania and am therefore represented by a junior senator who thinks that American citizens have no right to privacy. Rick Santorum believes the right to privacy is a "myth." His argument for this claim, such as it is, appears to be that any right not specifically enumerated and explicitly stated in the Constitution — no matter how elemental and basic — does not exist. That's a frightening way to read the Constitution.

Thus, for Santorum, abortion ought to be illegal because it is based on the false claim of a right to privacy. (That's what he argues, anyway. I suspect it's actually the other way around. Santorum starts with wanting abortion to be illegal, is unable to reconcile this aim with the existence of a right to privacy, and therefore arrives at the conclusion that there can be no such thing.)

There are other kinds of social conservatives, people who accept, or even aggressively defend, the right to privacy. They may argue that this right is not absolute (which, after all, it isn't), and that it must sometimes be weighed against competing claims. And they may lean more toward those other claims than I would like. But still, I'd be much happier to learn that John Roberts is that kind of conservative than to learn that he agrees with Santorum.

* * * * * * * * *

That particular cliche — "staunch conservative" — is interesting. Why don't we hear about "staunch liberals"?

Something similar seems to happen with the use of "staunch" to describe religious fidelity. We read of staunch Southern Baptists but not of staunch Unitarians.

I think this is a case of connotation bleeding into denotation. The word "staunch" here seems to be used according to its second adjectival definition, "firm; steadfast; loyal." But this meaning seems to have arisen from the first definition: "watertight; seaworthy." This, I'm guessing, is closely related to its primary definition as a verb: "to stop or check (the flow of blood or tears, etc.) from (a wound, opening, etc.)."

It's this connotation of tightness, a stopping or checking, that lends the word more aptness for describing people who are more conservative.

As a firm, steadfast and loyal liberal, I see this staunch tightness as a kind of *up-*tightness. "Watertight." Like a frog's ass.

* * * * * * * * *

I found this post from Pretty Fakes due to the linking back to the Left Behind series here. The LB reference segues what starts as a discussion of the new Sufjan Stevens album into a discussion of the (to be pitied) kids at Patrick Henry College and on into a discussion of James Dobson (who probably should be pitied too, but I just can't seem to see around the damage he does to conjure up a sense of empathy here).

The post is actually more interesting than I'm making it sound, so GRTWT.

* * * * * * * * *

If you missed the link in comments earlier, the Left Behind Choose-Your-Own-Adventure story has begun.

Warning: the Neverending Chose-Your-Own-Adventure Story Engine could potentially make the rest of your day much less productive.

* * * * * * * * *

Money magazine has decided, somehow, that Moorestown, N.J. is the very best place to live. (Careful with the Jersey jokes, I was born in Plainfield.)

Moorestown, Money says, "remains affordable." What, then, does "affordable" mean? "A four bedroom home within walking distance of town goes for $400,000 to $500,000, and starter homes can be had for much less."

The median price of a home in Moorestown is $367,412. The median price of a home in all of the cities honored in Money's list of best places is $316,082.

The median price of a home in the United States, in 2004, was $185,200 — which is still beyond what a great many of us can afford (the median family income in 2005, HUD says, is $58,000). But if you want to buy a house in the Best Place to Live, you'll have to pay about twice that.

Thanks for the tip, Money.

* * * * * * * * *

Speaking of Sen. Santorum … the Pennsylvania GOP e-mail list, which brings near daily news about the junior senator, is sent out from someone named Vincent Galko. I keep having this momentary confusion wondering why this guy is so intent on saying mean things about Bob Casey.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 18, 2005

Any time you want

Next Post

July 22, 2005 L.B.: Other People

Recent Comments

69 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I am an ancestor of King David, born from a foreign widow's faithfulness. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Obed Salmon Jesse Boaz