Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

slacktivist

“You deserve an A”

Last updated on: May 23, 2005 at 5:04 pm   by Fred Clark

36 Comments

“You deserve an A” 2005-05-23T17:04:43-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Man loves himself inordinately. Since his determinate existence does not deserve the devotion lavished upon it, it is obviously necessary to practice some deception in order to justify such excessive devotion. While such deception is constantly directed against competing wills, seeking to secure their acceptance and validation of the self's too generous opinion of itself, its primary purpose is to deceive, not others, but the self. The self must at any rate deceive itself first. Its deception of others is partly an effort to convince itself against itself. The fact that this necessity exists is an important indication of the vestige of truth which abides with the self in all its confusion and which it must placate before it can act. The dishonesty of man is thus an interesting refutation of the doctrine of man's total depravity.

— Reinhold Niebuhr, The Nature and Destiny of Man,

"It's not a lie if you believe it."

— George Costanza

I'm fascinated by what Niebuhr describes here as "the deception of others [as] partly an effort to convince [the self] against itself." The deception of others and self-deception seem inextricable. In a footnote to the passage above, Niebuhr also quotes this, from Philip Leon, "The self-deceiver does not believe … what he says or he would not be a deceiver. He does believe what he says or he would not be deceived. He both believes and does not believe."

I was reminded of that discussion when reading this LA Times story about President Bush's traveling road show promoting (or self-promoting, or self-assuring) Social Security privatization.

The president has been traveling from city to city to conduct "town hall meetings" in an effort to persuade the public to support his plan to reform Social Security.

Except none of that is true. The town hall meetings are carefully screened events not open to the general public. These meetings have nothing to do with persuasion — no one who is not already persuaded is permitted to attend. And, of course, the president refuses to make public the details of any "plan," offering instead a series of vaguely hinted at goals — the purpose of which is not to reform Social Security, but to replace it with a system of government-run private accounts paid for with the payroll taxes currently used to fund Social Security.

These town hall meetings are like a kind of postmodern theater. The meetings are deliberately misleading. The president knows this, and we know this, and he knows that we know that he knows this. Duplicity becomes multiplicity and one gets the sense that the president has lost his way in a hall of mirrors.

Consider the following exchange:

"You got any thoughts about Social Security?" Bush asked 22-year-old Concordia University senior Christy Paavola, one of five younger workers who appeared on stage with him [Thursday] at the Milwaukee Art Museum.

"Yes," Paavola said. "I don't think it's going to be there when I retire, which is really scary."

Many young people, the president commented, think they are paying into a retirement system that will never pay them back. He asked Paavola: "Got anything else you want to say?"

"I really like the idea of personal savings accounts," Paavola said.

"You did a heck of a job," Bush told her. "You deserve an A."

This "conversation" was as awkwardly stilted and unspontaneous as the banter written for awards-show presenters. Nothing in this exchange is genuine. The president begins by asking the student if she has "any thoughts," knowing full well that her response has been screened, revised, coached and rehearsed ahead of time to be the same as that of every other "representative" young person sharing their "thoughts" at these meetings.

(George W. Bush, we learn, is not someone with whom you want to share a stage if you forget your lines. "Got anything else you want to say?" is not the most seamless piece of improvisation.)

The Times article recounts the efforts of local Republican groups to solicit people from particular demographics who would be willing to share these pre-approved "thoughts" at town hall meetings:

… a memo circulated this week among members of one group, Women Impacting Public Policy, illustrates the lengths to which the White House has gone to make sure the right points are made at the president's public appearances. … The memo went on to solicit several types of people "who he would like to visit with."

This student was recruited by local party operatives acting on specific instructions from the White House. She was then screened, approved and coached to parrot a particular set of talking points. And President Bush acknowledges this.

"You did a heck of a job," Bush told her. "You deserve an A."

But here's the really astonishing thing: Bush seems to perceive these ritualized meetings as genuine evidence of public support for his Social Security schemes. He creates and orchestrates a carefully scripted scenario, then seems to respond to this scenario as though it were a legitimate and spontaneous outpouring of public opinion. Deception has become self-deception — "he both believes and does not believe."

The president really seems to believe, as one of his aides famously put it to journalist Ron Suskind, that "when we act, we create our own reality." The fact that his claims about Social Security — it's imminent "bankruptcy," the spectre of massive government default on Treasury Bonds, the idea that we must cut benefits by 30 percent today to avoid 20-percent benefit cuts 40 years from now — don't add up is only a matter of concern for those in the "reality-based community."

Bush doesn't live there anymore. He has created his own reality. And he believes it.

class warfare

Previous Post



May 20, 2005

L.B.: Holy spirits

Next Post



May 24, 2005 Private property?

Recent Comments

36 Comments | Leave a Comment


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Paul told the Thessalonians that those who are unwilling to work should not eat.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from slacktivist

Family

Honk and holler as we go

slacktivist

Family

Bad Bosses are not beloved

slacktivist

Family

Complaint department

slacktivist

Family

Postcards from America (02.05.25)

slacktivist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Emotion in Early Christianity by Andrew Crislip

Andrew Crislip’s Emotion in Early Christianity examines an often overlooked dimension of...

16 Spiritual Touchstones for a More Grounded Life

  After decades of spiritual study, here are 16 principles I try...

Catholic Evangelization: Sharing Your Faith Every Day

Welcome back to the Graceful Awakening mini-series called, “From Faith to Mission.” ...

The Pillar of the Boatmen: the Ancient Monument...

The Pillar of the Boatmen is a Romano-Gaulish sculpture that dates from...

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

In one sense walking into Westminster Abbey is like walking down the...

'Super Scam Me' Exposes AI Jon Bon Jovi...

Leslie Pickett believed she was in a relationship with Jon Bon Jovi....

view all Progressive Christian blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Comments are closed.

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube