Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
The Landlord Society

The Landlord Society

Last updated on: June 25, 2012 at 12:14 am by Fred Clark

3 Comments

The Landlord Society 2012-06-25T00:14:44-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Stephen Moore of the Club for Greed weighs in on President Bush's second-term "ownership society" agenda:

"By doing these things in little bitty steps at a time, it's sort of like a slippery slope, but in the right direction."

The right direction for people like Moore means taxing wages, but not wealth. It means cutting the funding for frivolities like public education, Social Security, Medicare, veterans benefits and homeland security. It means Two Americas as deliberate policy. And the America that Moore gets to live in is invitation only.

Wage-earning riff-raff are not invited.

Moore's comment is quoted in an L.A. Times article by Warren Vieth (reg. req.), bearing the unhelpful headline "Bush Yet to Flesh Out Domestic Agenda." The subhead tells the real story: "Many likely small steps in taxes and savings would add up to 'radical change,' analysts say."

With only a week to go before the Republican National Convention, the lack of details in President Bush's second-term domestic policy agenda has left some conservative activists worrying aloud about the Vision Thing.

But analysts from both parties make the case that although the individual pieces of Bush's emerging agenda may not appear that weighty or new, they still add up to something big.

Bundled within overlapping themes of tax reform and economic "ownership," they say, are initiatives that would, if enacted, move the country toward fundamentally different systems of taxation and social insurance.

After citing Stephen Moore, Vieth also quotes Peter Orszag of the Brookings Institution:

"What they're trying to do is a radical transformation of the tax code … They're trying to do it in little pieces rather than all at once. The sum of all those pieces would be a radical change."

Something big. Radical change. Radical transformation. Fundamentally different. Slippery slope. Got all that?

Yet despite the sweeping effects of all this, President Bush has been rather vague about the details. This is a president who doesn't like to burden the public with too much information about his plans for massive changes in the fabric of our society.

If you want a sense of what many of the "little bitty steps" will look like, consider the archetypal "ownership society" program: the Free Humvee for Rich People Tax Credit.

No, really. If you're wealthy enough to afford one, and if you own your own business, you can buy yourself a shiny new suburban assault vehicle and eventually write off nearly all of the cost on your taxes.

The basic attributes of the FHRPTC are true of most of the other little pieces that add up to Bush's ownership society:

1. It's pay-to-play, only benefitting those who have the thousands of dollars in surplus disposable income that serves as the entry fee to take advantage of it.

2. Wage-earners shoulder all of the cost without having a chance at the benefit.

Vieth pieces together a list of some of the probable ingredients to the "ownership society" agenda, based on what he's gleaned from "analysts and advisors, including some who have been conferring with the administration." That list includes:

• [Extending] first-term tax cuts … instead of letting them expire at various points over the next seven years. The cuts include lower income-tax rates, expanded breaks for married couples and families, reduced taxes on dividends and capital gains, bigger corporate tax deductions and a phased-out inheritance tax. Cost: about $1 trillion over 10 years.

• Allowing workers to divert a portion of their Social Security payroll taxes to new individual retirement accounts over which they control the choice of investments. Like 401(k) plans, their future value would depend on market performance, not government guarantees. Cost: $1 trillion over 10 years to maintain promised benefits.

• Scaling back the alternative minimum tax, which was instituted to ensure that wealthy filers wouldn't be able to shelter all of their income from taxes, but has begun to bite at the middle class because of income inflation. Cost: perhaps $500 billion over 10 years.

• Creating new vehicles — including lifetime savings accounts and retirement savings accounts — for reducing future taxes on savings and investment. Cost: minimal over the first 10 years, but increasingly large as future earnings are withdrawn.

• Expanding health-savings accounts, which allow Americans to accumulate money tax-free for future medical expenses, and creating similar homeownership tax breaks, such as credits for first-time buyers. Cost: uncertain.

With the exception of the already existing first-time homebuyer credits, these are all pay-to-play. They're like the old joke about the banker who says, "I can only approve the loan if you don't really need the money." The ownership society is explicitly and unapologetically an agenda to help the rich get richer.

Somebody in the Bush campaign has latched onto the word "ownership" because it taps into an ideal that is essential to the American dream. Most of us want, some day, to own our own home and to own at least a stake, if not a share, of our own livelihood.

The Bush campaign realizes this. Like the Assyrian messenger in the Book of Isaiah, they bait their trap with the promise of ownership: "This is what the king of Assyria says: Make peace with me and come out to me. Then every one of you will eat from his own vine and fig tree and drink water from his own cistern …"

That sounds like a wonderful vision of ownership. Except for the part where the king of Assyria also captured all the cities in Judah and declared himself their owner and the owner of all the people who lived there. So, you see, "ownership" can mean different things to different people.

Bush's American-dream rhetoric of ownership contrasts sharply with the idea of ownership promoted by his agenda. That agenda is not so much about promoting ownership as it is about rewarding owners.

The contrast is illustrated, again, by the great American archetypes in Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life.

Bush's "ownership society" has nothing to do with the egalitarian dream that the Bailey Bros. Building & Loan represents. ("Look at it today. Dozens of the prettiest little homes you ever saw. 90 percent owned by suckers who used to pay rent to you. …")

It is the ownership, instead, of Old Man Potter — the majority shareholder who lays off workers to boost his stock price, the landlord to whom the entire town pays rent.

"We've had an income tax in the United States for the past 90 years," Orszag said. "Regardless of whether your income comes from wages or investments, it is subject to tax …"

The administration's goal is to create a system in which only wage income is taxed, he said. The benefits include potentially higher rates of savings and investment. But the tax code would become more regressive, taking a larger percentage of income from low-income groups, because recipients of inherited wealth would get a free ride.

The problem with the supposed benefit there — "higher rates of savings and investment" — is that it will only be true for those who can afford it. And thanks to the "radical transformation" of the tax structure, wage-earners (i.e., anybody who actually needs their paycheck) will be less able to save or invest.

Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, sums up the problem:

"Ownership implies the middle class has some savings with which they can own something. … The stark economic reality is: America's middle class has no savings."

class warfare

greed

Previous Post

August 24, 2004

The Ownership Society

Next Post

August 25, 2004 Leave No Voter Behind

Recent Comments

3 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Let there be light"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Elijah Paul Moses God