Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Oswald alone

Oswald alone

Last updated on: August 21, 2004 at 8:09 am by Fred Clark

11 Comments

Oswald alone 2004-08-21T08:09:17-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

"He's been baptized, sanctified, redeemed by the blood,
But his daily devotions are stuck in the mud …"

— Amy Grant, "Fat Baby" (Millikan/Robinson)

On May 4 of this year, President Bush spoke about his daily devotional reading:

Bush said he is reading Oswald Chambers, a Scottish-born devotional writer and author of "My Utmost for His Highest," who died in 1917. "If you've read Oswald Chambers, you'll understand that Oswald Chambers is a pretty good gauge to test your walk," he said.

This is the same devotional book that Bush spoke of during the 2000 campaign. The president must really like this book — he's been reading it every day for more than three years.

I find that … odd.

My Utmost isn't bad but, well, there's not much there there. He has some thoughtful things to say about loving God above all else, but even at his best Chambers is a kind of Bonhoeffer lite. And My Utmost does not include 365 cases of Chambers at his best. Its entries for many days are about as insightful and spiritually enriching as a newspaper horoscope.

Don't take my word for it — you can read the president's favorite devotional online here or here.

The enduring popularity of the book is hard to explain. My guess is that it has more to do with the informal-but-forceful system of evangelical imprimatur. The book is regarded as acceptable and therefore is widely accepted.

I've read the book, but I've never managed to stick with Chambers' daily readings for an entire year. (Confession: I've never been good at the whole evangelical pseudo-discipline of "daily devotions." I suppose I'm more of a spiritual binge-drinker/bulimic.)

My Utmost's arbitrary and fragmentary choice of Scripture texts is frustrating and not always respectful of context. After reading a couple of months worth of such entries, one realizes that the actual texts matter little as Chambers quickly leaves them behind to offer some hortatory fortune cookie. These little pep talks start to blur together after a while and I start to think that maybe my time would be better spent with Thomas a Kempis or John Woolman.

Take for example today's reading, which is allegedly based on Matthew 5:3, "Blessed are the poor in spirit, [for theirs is the kingdom of heaven]." Chambers isn't working his way through the Beatitudes, mind you, he just decided that August 21 was a good day for this particular Beatitude. (He discusses all of them, sort of, on July 25, and deals with another on March 26. This ad hoc approach may arise from his wife's literal cutting and pasting when she assembled this book from his writings 10 years after his death.)

The mini-homily Chambers spins out of this text includes statements like these:

"The true character of the loveliness that speaks for God is always unnoticed by the one possessing that quality."

"We always know when Jesus is at work because He produces in the commonplace something that is inspiring."

Well, OK. I guess. If you work hard enough to make sense of today's reading, you might decide that Chambers is approaching the idea that poverty of the spirit is something like the "being present" that Annie Dillard described as "Living like weasels." Or maybe not.

Passages like this may explain why we never hear Bush quoting or referring to something he read in Chambers' book. Chambers isn't exactly quotable. And even when he's basically recycling platitudes and proverbs, he tends to do so in a way that takes all the oomph out of them.

And but so anyway my question here is how is it possible that George W. Bush has been reading this book every day for three years? Three years! I understand that he likes the book, but shouldn't it have inspired him, by now, to move on to something with a little more "meat."

It's possible, of course, that Bush does not actually read this book every day. It's possible that some shrewd adviser told him, back in 2000, that talking about Oswald Chambers was a good and safe answer to questions about his personal spirituality and that years later he is still offering this same answer without thinking there's anything strange about that.

But let's stick to the more charitable view and take Bush at his word.

"I have fed you with milk, and not with meat," St. Paul told the Christians at Corinth. Chambers, to his credit, would I think have said the same thing to readers of My Utmost for His Highest.

"I gave you milk, not solid food," Paul wrote, "for you were not yet ready for it. Indeed, you are still not ready."

Milk is fine, and so is the spiritual enfamil of My Utmost, but one is supposed to grow from this — to move on to solid food and meat. Indeed, if one is really getting nourished, one must move on. As Calvin wrote, "If they never grow up so as to be able to bear at least some gentle food, it is certain that they have never been reared on milk."

I think Chambers would likely have been horrified at the prospect of a reader settling in and giving such preeminence to My Utmost for three years in a row. Consider this anecdote, related by J.I. Packer:

Chambers' word to a man who read only the Bible and books about it, and who felt stuck and inarticulate, was: "The trouble is you have allowed part of your brain to stagnate for want of use." The man later wrote, "There and then, [Chambers] gave me a list of over 50 books, philosophical, psychological, theological, covering almost every phase of modern thought," leading to "a revolution which can only be described as a mental new birth" — just as Chambers had hoped.

If that story is true then Chambers would likely join me in encouraging Bush to move along to some new devotional literature.

One might also consider that the past several years haven't gone so well for George W. Bush. He's gotten his country entangled in a deadly, monumentally costly and possibly insoluble quagmire in Iraq. And domestically he's bankrupted the national treasury while becoming the first president since Herbert Hoover to oversee a net loss of jobs.

A change might be a good thing.

So let me suggest some new devotional reading for the president.

We know Bush is a big fan of books that are fragmented into daily "readings." John Baillie's A Diary of Private Prayer is a profound, challenging and beautiful example of such a book. It may, however, be too much in keeping with Bush's dad's Episcopalian tastes for the current president's liking.

Charles Haddon Spurgeon is unassailably evangelical and a compassionate conservative to boot. His book Morning and Evening is organized in much the same way as Chambers, but it's got more kick to it. Bush might find plenty in Spurgeon that would "test his walk," but I think he'd also find the book a source of encouragement.

And that may be important, since I'm hoping that Bush is going to find himself rather discouraged on November 2 and thereafter.

At least, that's what I'm praying for during my sort-of-daily devotions.

evangelicals

Previous Post

August 20, 2004

Sovereignty not a given

Next Post

August 21, 2004 Karma Police

Recent Comments

11 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which church tradition celebrates the Feast of Epiphany as "Three Kings' Day"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Eastern Christianity Western Christianity Baptist Quakerism