Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Bishop’s gambit

Bishop’s gambit

Last updated on: June 22, 2012 at 11:19 am by Fred Clark

14 Comments

Bishop’s gambit 2012-06-22T11:19:50-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Colorado Springs, where at least three priests have been accused of sexual abuse, is headed by Bishop Michael Sheridan.

Sheridan, The Denver Post reports, has recently found a way for his diocese to make national headlines about something other than the buggering of adolescent boys:

The bishop of Colorado's second-largest Roman Catholic diocese has issued a pastoral letter saying Catholics cannot receive Communion if they vote for politicians who support abortion rights, stem-cell research, euthanasia or gay marriage.

Only after citizens reverse their positions and repent for their sins in the confessional would access to the central ritual of the church be restored, Colorado Springs Bishop Michael Sheridan instructed 125,000 Catholics in his charge.

(The full text of the letter can be found here, along with another creepy photo of Sheridan.) Some excerpts:

This coming November we Americans will participate in one of the most important national elections in recent history. … I consider it my duty as your bishop to write to you about these matters so that you might go to the polls this fall with a well-informed conscience. …

The right judgment of conscience is not a matter of personal preference nor has it anything to do with feelings. It has only to do with objective truth. … As Catholics we have the further obligation to give assent to the doctrinal and moral teachings of the Church. …

Any Catholic politicians who advocate for abortion, for illicit stem cell research or for any form of euthanasia ipso facto place themselves outside full communion with the Church and so jeopardize their salvation. Any Catholics who vote for candidates who stand for abortion, illicit stem cell research or euthanasia suffer the same fateful consequences. It is for this reason that these Catholics, whether candidates for office or those who would vote for them, may not receive Holy Communion until they have recanted their positions and been reconciled with God and the Church in the Sacrament of Penance.

For the record, I do not know of a single Catholic politician in the history of the United States who has "advocated for abortion."

Abortion, divorce and adultery are three things the Catholic Church opposes which remain legal in the United States. Most Catholic politicians do not advocate changing the law — and dispensing with the Constitution — in order to make these things illegal. Their position cannot said to be "advocating for abortion" any more than they can be said to be "advocating for divorce" or "advocating for adultery." One can certainly agree with the Catholic Church's teaching that these three things are undesirable, even that they are sins, while also agreeing that attempting to criminalize them would succeed only in producing additional grievous problems.

Sheridan's real complaint is not with Catholic politicians or with Catholic voters, but with the wisdom of the American legal system and the Constitution. He's either not smart enough to realize this himself, or he is cynically shrewd enough to realize that a frontal assault on the Constitution might not play as well in the media as his clerical grandstanding. He's attacking the Constitution diagonally, as any bishop would.

Let's be very clear: This poor man's Richelieu has commanded Catholics in his diocese to vote as he instructs them to on threat of eternal damnation.

Diocesan spokesman Peter Howard says exactly this: "Some people will accuse us of using this as a political maneuver to vote a certain way. It's for their own spiritual salvation."

Howard does not deny that Sheridan's commands to the 125,000 Catholics in his diocese are "a political maneuver to vote a certain way." He only explains why the bishop is commanding how they vote: "It's for their own spiritual salvation."

This sort of thing has lots of historical precedent. It's why my French Huguenot ancestors came here in the first place.

You must vote according to conscience or be damned, the bishop says. Conscience is a matter of objective truth; objective truth is a matter of church teaching; church teaching is what I tell you it is. Therefore you must vote as I say or be damned.

The next step — always — is "Therefore you must vote for me."

Perhaps this ridiculous, impious little cross-dresser in Colorado Springs is not himself quite ambitious enough to take that next step. But someone will if we don't convincingly shout down these foolish little Napoleon wanna-bes as they arise.

That next step doesn't mean bishops ordering the faithful to elect a particular president. It means ordering the faithful to anoint a particular king.

That's not Catholic. It's just medieval.

evangelicals

church & state

clergy abuse

Previous Post

May 14, 2004

Get McHealthy!

Next Post

May 15, 2004 C.S. Lewis on theocracy

Recent Comments

14 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Where did Jacob and his family settle in Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Thebes Goshen Cairo Memphis