Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Bush, AIDS and evangelicals

Bush, AIDS and evangelicals

Last updated on: February 11, 2004 at 4:32 pm by Fred Clark

2 Comments

Bush, AIDS and evangelicals 2004-02-11T16:32:50-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Back in October, The New York Times' Elisabeth Bumiller wrote a piece the paper headlined "Evangelicals Sway White House on Human Rights Issues Abroad."

The article could just as accurately have been titled "White House Courts Evangelicals with Human Rights Issues Abroad."

Bumiller describes the various human rights issues that are of particular concern to many American evangelical Christians — war in the Sudan, AIDS in Africa, sexual trafficking — and of the commitments they have received from President Bush's White House to work on these issues.

The political benefit for President Bush is that this allows him to fire up his religious conservative base while still avoiding their hobbyhorse hotbuttons — abortion and homosexuality — that tend to alienate swing voters:

… religious leaders and administration officials note that white evangelicals accounted for about 40 percent of the votes that Mr. Bush received in the 2000 presidential election. In 2004, political analysts say, he is unlikely to be re-elected without the strong support of this constituency, which is predominately but not wholly Republican, and which in other years has thrown significant support to southern Democrats like Bill Clinton. Mr. Rove is now tending to the constituency with great care.

"You're not going to run into too many people who are smarter than Karl," said Dr. Richard D. Land, the president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, who is in regular contact with Mr. Rove. "Karl understands the importance of this segment of his coalition, and I think the president understands it. The president feels that one of the contributory factors to his father's loss is that he didn't get as many evangelical votes as Reagan did."

The human rights issues offer a politically safe way for the president to appeal to his base of white evangelicals, who leading scholars and pollsters define by their membership in historically white evangelical denominations, like the Southern Baptists and the Assemblies of God. Evangelical churches believe that the Bible is truth, that members have an imperative to proselytize and convert and that Jesus Christ is the only way to salvation.

"There are these issues below the radar screen that are of deep concern to the evangelical community, and while they are sincerely held by the administration, they also have the benefit of allowing the president to say, 'I have responded to what you wanted me to do,' " Rabbi [David] Saperstein said. "But they're not issues that will alienate large segments of the center in America. These are all-win issues for the administration."

These below-radar issues have comprised half of President Bush's strategy for reaching out to religious conservative voters.

The other half of that strategy is the religious language and symbolism supplied by speechwriter, and Wheaton College-alumnus, Michael Gerson. Gerson ensures that all of President Bush's prepared statements contain this subtle, but powerful, language. Such language is notably absent on those rare instances when the president is allowed to speak without a prepared text. (Consider again Bush's rambling remarks during Sunday's Meet the Press interview — no "wonder working power," no allusions to hymns or parables or scripture. That seems to support the idea that, without Gerson's hand at work, this language does not come naturally to the president.)

But many of the White House's initiatives on these "human rights issues abroad" suffer from the same someday, somewhere-over-the-rainbow, quality that characterizes President Bush's other domestic proposals. With great fanfare, he commits $15 billion to fight AIDS in Africa, but there's little immediate funding — only promises that years from now he'll pay off the balance. Just like the tax cuts, the deficit-reduction, prescription drug benefits, the Mars mission … you name it. It's promises today, big spending someday. And Bush's evangelical supporters are beginning to get suspicious.

The Massachusetts Supreme Court has altered President Bush's strategy toward religious conservatives. With support for an anti-gay-marriage constitutional amendment becoming a litmus test for support from the religious right, the president is having to take sides in a high-profile, hot-button debate. Once he does this, he doesn't need the below-the-radar support from those evangelicals who were concerned about things like AIDS in Africa or sexual trafficking. And funding such things is expensive, threatening his support from the small-but-vocal deficit-hawk wing of his own party.

Whether due to this change in strategy, or due to the fact that his initial promises were disingenuous, President Bush is not living up to his commitments on these human rights issues:

Groups such as the National Association of Evangelicals pressured Bush last month to include in his budget proposal a $3.6 billion catch-up on his 2003 Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief that promised $15 billion over five years. The first installment last year was $2.4 billion.

The Rev. Richard Cizik, NAE vice president for governmental affairs, was among those urging the $3.6 billion figure. …

"I'm confident in the end that we're going to get the dollars that have been promised," Cizik said. "It's just that at this point in this budget cycle, we're not going to pull them out unless we get the Democrats to do it and if they do, I say God bless them."

"God bless" the Democrats? Could Bush's failure to live up to his commitment on this really result in a loss of votes? As Steven Waldman of Belief.net has pointed out, that's not so far fetched.

The lesson here for President Bush is ably described by Slate's Timothy Noah, who points out that lying to his political opponents is one thing, but lying to his own supporters is far more serious. Noah's topic is Bush's nonsense numbers about discretionary spending, but the principle applies here as well:

… in his Feb. 9 Meet the Press interview, Bush told an entirely new sort of lie — one that may cause him a different sort of trouble than he's used to. …

He's lying, in short, to people who believe in him. …

Is it possible all these conservatives are going to take Bush's lie, er, lying down? Be warned, Republican brothers: Once Bush starts lying to you, he may never stop.

evangelicals

Previous Post

February 10, 2004

Avian flu

Next Post

February 12, 2004 Changing the tone

Recent Comments

2 Comments | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I was lifted up on a pole that healed those who looked at me. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Golden Calf A healing statue The bronze serpent The Stone Tablets