Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music and Entertainment
The Hopeful Relevance of “The American President”

The Hopeful Relevance of “The American President”

Last updated on: November 3, 2020 at 10:40 am by Sister Rose

The Hopeful Relevance of “The American President” 2020-11-03T10:40:26-07:00 Sister Rose

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Every four years I start watching my favorite films about the U.S. president. These include All the President’s Men (1976), Lincoln (2012), the miniseries John Adams (2008) and my favorite The American President (1995.)

In “The American President” Michael Douglas plays widowed Democratic President Andrew Shepherd and Martin Sheen is A. J. McInerny, his long-time friend and chief of staff. The film is writer Aaron Sorkin’s romantic-comedy take on the drama of a White House dealing with legislation on the environment and guns as Shepherd’s bid for re-election is ramping up. But the fun begins when lobbyist Sydney Allen Wade (Annette Benning) shows up at a White House meeting as a recent hire at an environmental organization. The president is immediately attracted to her and after agreeing to be his date at an official state dinner, Wade becomes known as “the president’s girlfriend.”

This “non-relationship” causes complications for Wade at the office and for the president and his campaign. Shepherd’s main rival, Republican Senator Bob Rumson (Richard Dreyfus) tells his team that they couldn’t go after Shepherd’s character in the previous election because he was a recent widower. A negative campaign would have garnered sympathy for Shepherd. But now, the election is about to become all about character. As Wade is attacked for being at a flag burning years before, for staying overnight at the White House, and implying that she slept with decision-makers to get their votes, Shepherd’s popularity starts to slip in the polls. Rumson goes after Shepherd’s character and ethics, calling for family values to be restored.

Things become more complicated when Shepherd promises to get Wade votes for the environmental lobby when they first meet but then backtracks in a political move to get senate votes for his anti-crime bill. This happens just before the State of the Union in January and causes a rift in their relationship. Though Shepherd insists that it is politics, Wade loses her job and takes a job for a politician in Connecticut.

Shepherd is no saint. He fails to listen to the wisdom of Lewis Rothschild (Michael J. Fox), his Assistant for Domestic Policy on the relationship between gun control and crime and fails again for being so cavalier about his political wrangling and Wade’s job. As Rumson’s attacks on his character heat up, Shepherd refuses to engage. But he realizes his mistakes and has the honesty to make good on them. In a spontaneous appearance at a White House press conference just before the State of the Union, Shepherd not only responds to Rumson and apologizes (in so many words) to Wade, but exalts the status of character in the role of the presidency and as citizens of the United States.

The film is not perfect. There is only one person of color in an influential position, Anna Deavere Smith as Robin McCall, the White House Press Secretary. This film today might have a very different cast so that anyone watching it would find themselves there. And what if Annette Bening had played a woman president and Douglas a political operative?

I watched this film a few times over the last year and I began to think that it doesn’t make sense anymore. The film is 25 years old and was the precursor to the incredibly popular television series “The West Wing” and the new HBO “The West Wing” voting special reuniting many of the series’ key actors to make a point about participating in our democracy.

But in the current political reality in the U.S., the argument that character matters has been moved off the table almost completely. I don’t think I have heard anyone mention family values as an important issue in four years (please note, that Jesus’ family values are the Beatitudes and Works of Mercy, not the issues of America’s culture wars.) None of the Sunday news shows talk explicitly about the connection between character and politics. You don’t see essays about character and the president or politics in the press (though books have been written.) Bob Rumson’s attacks would be laughable today because character simply doesn’t appear to matter in the cacophony of campaigning in 2020. If I were to recommend this film, many people would probably just laugh.

But then comes Shepherd’s speech at the end of the film and I sit up and pay attention as my dismay at the current situation diminishes and hope surges through me. This is the single most defining and hopeful speech in decades of what it means to be a U.S. president and a citizen of this country. Sorkin’s soaring rhetoric uplifts us because the American presidency is all about character, of doing the right thing even when no one is looking. The relevance of these words rings like the sound of a thousand liberty bells calling out to those who are open to hearing them, to discernment and wisdom – on election day.

Character matters.

Here is the written text of President Andrew Shepherd at the press briefing in “The American President.”

For the last couple of months, Senator Rumson has suggested that being President of this country was, to a certain extent, about character. And although I’ve not been willing to engage in his attacks on me, I have been here three years and three days, and I can tell you without hesitation: Being President of this country is entirely about character.

For the record, yes, I am a card-carrying member of the ACLU, but the more important question is “Why aren’t you, Bob?” Now this is an organization whose sole purpose is to defend the Bill of Rights, so it naturally begs the question, why would a senator, his party’s most powerful spokesman and a candidate for President, choose to reject upholding the constitution? Now if you can answer that question, folks, then you’re smarter than I am, because I didn’t understand it until a few hours ago.

America isn’t easy. America is advanced citizenship. You’ve gotta want it bad, ’cause it’s gonna put up a fight. It’s gonna say, “You want free speech? Let’s see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who’s standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours.” You want to claim this land as the land of the free? Then the symbol of your country cannot just be a flag. The symbol also has to be one of its citizens exercising his right to burn that flag in protest. Now show me that, defend that, celebrate that in your classrooms.

Then you can stand up and sing about the land of the free.

I’ve known Bob Rumson for years. And I’ve been operating under the assumption that the reason Bob devotes so much time and energy to shouting at the rain was that he simply didn’t get it. Well, I was wrong. Bob’s problem isn’t that he doesn’t get it. Bob’s problem is that he can’t sell it!

We have serious problems to solve, and we need serious people to solve them. And whatever your particular problem is, I promise you Bob Rumson is not the least bit interested in solving it. He is interested in two things, and two things only: making you afraid of it, and telling you who’s to blame for it. That, ladies and gentlemen, is how you win elections. You gather a group of middle age, middle class, middle income voters who remember with longing an easier time, and you talk to them about family, and American values and character, and you wave an old photo of the President’s girlfriend and you scream about patriotism. You tell them she’s to blame for their lot in life. And you go on television and you call her a whore.

Sydney Ellen Wade has done nothing to you, Bob. She has done nothing but put herself through school, represent the interests of public school teachers, and lobby for the safety of our natural resources. You want a character debate, Bob? You better stick with me, ’cause Sydney Ellen Wade is way out of your league.

I’ve loved two women in my life. I lost one to cancer. And I lost the other ’cause I was so busy keeping my job, I forgot to do my job. Well, that ends right now.

Tomorrow morning the White House is sending a bill to Congress for its consideration. It’s White House Resolution 455, an energy bill requiring a twenty percent reduction of the emission of fossil fuels over the next ten years. It is by far the most aggressive stride ever taken in the fight to reverse the effects of global warming. The other piece of legislation is the crime bill. As of today, it no longer exists. I’m throwing it out. I’m throwing it out and writing a law that makes sense. You cannot address crime prevention without getting rid of assault weapons and hand guns. I consider them a threat to national security, and I will go door to door if I have to, but I’m gonna convince Americans that I’m right, and I’m gonna get the guns.

We’ve got serious problems, and we need serious people. And if you want to talk about character, Bob, you’d better come at me with more than a burning flag and a membership card. If you want to talk about character and American values, fine. Just tell me where and when, and I’ll show up. This a time for serious people, Bob, and your fifteen minutes are up….

Adult Faith Formation

The American President

the west wing

Previous Post

October 24, 2020

"Two Crowns" new film about St. Maximilian Kolbe

Next Post

November 13, 2020 "Jingle Jangle: A Christmas Journey" shines in the darkness

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Adolescent Adult Faith Formation Advertising Analysis Animals Pets Animation art Authors Awards best pope pictures Bible BioPic Blogs Book Reviews Books books into film Catechesis Catholic comedy Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Social Teaching (CST) Catholics in Media Christian genre Christmas movies Church and cinema Cognitive science Comedy Comics Commerntary Communication Cooking Courses Critics and Criticism Dance Daughters of St Paul news Devil movies digital games Documentary Drama Economics Ecumenical Education and Technology Education: Access and Empowerment electronic Environment Events Exorcism movies Eye on Entertainment Faith and film Faith formation Fantasy Film Essays Film Festivals Film History Film Retreat Film Reviews Film TV about Ultra Orthodox Jews Food General Grace Historical thriller History Horror How to Images INNdustry with Sister Rose Internet Interviews jesuits Kindness Lectures Lent Life Lists Literature media Media analysis Media Literacy/Media Mindfulness Music Musical National Catholic Reporter New on DVD Non-violence Nonviolence Obituaries On Faith and Media Oscars Ovis et bovis et universe pecore Parenting Pastoral Communication Pastoral communications Pauline Books & Media pax christi PCMS & Online Courses Peace Philosophy Photos Planning for Communication pope francis Popular Culture Radio RCL Benziger reality tv Reflections on life and grace religion Religious Lif Research Resources Retreat Rosary Sacraments Science and faith Social justice Social Media spirituality Spirituality and Media Sports Sr Rose Faith and Media Sr. Rose movies St. Anthony Messenger Stage & Theater stereotypes story Streaming series Survey Television the bible the bible movie The INNdustry with Sr Rose the voice Theater Themes of Catholic Social Teaching theologizing violence Theology theology of violence TV reviews and notes Uncategorized Video Video games Violence VR Games War War films Women World Film Young Adult YouTube

Select a Month September 2025 March 2025 December 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 December 2022 October 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 December 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city did Paul write his first letter to the Corinthians from?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ephesus Rome Athens Corinth