Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Sick Pilgrim

Home
Catholic
Reaction Round Up: A Hall of Shame

Reaction Round Up: A Hall of Shame

Last updated on: August 21, 2018 at 12:56 pm by Maren Grossman

Reaction Round Up: A Hall of Shame 2018-08-21T12:56:09-05:00 Maren Grossman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The past week has been eye opening. Not only is the world more aware than ever of the scope and severity of child abuse and its attending coverups – but we have seen some truly dreadful reactions from Catholic bishops, clergy, and commentators. Here are some of the worst.

1. The scandal is the fault of the media and of government officials who are prejudiced against Catholicism.

Let’s not forget that we only know about these abuse cases because of the hard work done by journalists (particularly in Boston) and government officials (particularly in Pennsylvania). We owe them. Big time.

2. Let’s launch a PR site to save face.

No. Let’s not.

3. Don’t scapegoat.

Not scapegoating people is important here – yet, as Rebecca Bratten Weiss has pointed out, the whole point of a scapegoat is that blame is placed on someone innocent. Placing blame on the guilty is justice. Placing responsibility on the incompetent is justice.

However, speaking of scapegoats…

4. It’s contraception and the rejection of Humanae Vitae.

Cool story, bro. But we aren’t talking about the behavior of the laity.

But maybe…

5. It’s the gays.

This argument has appeared in multiple places and in multiple forms. However, let’s focus in particular on the statement by Bishop Morlino of Madision, Wisconsin. That Bishop Morlino blames homosexuality for pedophilia is bad enough, but he also offers this statement: “For too long we have diminished the reality of sin — we have refused to call a sin a sin — and we have excused sin in the name of a mistaken notion of mercy. In our efforts to be open to the world we have become all too willing to abandon the Way, the Truth, and the Life. In order to avoid causing offense we offer to ourselves and to others niceties and human consolation.”

Bishop Morlino may not be aware of this, but the general population has no problem calling pedophilia a sin. As far as most people, secular and religious, are concerned, there is no greater evil. Although there may be widespread acceptance of homosexuality, contraception, abortion, and casual sexual encounters, most people have no problem condemning pedophilia in no uncertain terms.

This hamfisted attempt to place responsibility on homosexuals and on a laity accepting of homosexuality only reinforces the perception that it is specifically the bishops who have diminished the reality of the specific sin of child abuse.

6. It’s unchastity.

Sexual assault is violence. If you can’t tell the difference between sexual assault and having sex, you have a problem.

7. There have been almost no new cases since 2002.

Is this supposed to make us feel better when, yes, there have been cases, and many of the bishops responsible for cover-ups before and after 2002 still have power over which priests are still in active ministry in our parishes?

8. Victims should be ashamed to accuse the clergy because of the skeletons in their own closets.

This is on the short list of nastiest things a person could say.

9. The statement from the USCCB.

It would be nice if this document inspired more confidence.

It reads: “The third goal is to advocate for better procedures to resolve complaints against bishops. For example, the canonical procedures that follow a complaint will be studied with an eye toward concrete proposals to make them more prompt, fair, and transparent and to specify what constraints may be imposed on bishops at each stage of that process.”

Despite claims to transparency, the phrase “canonical procedures” is alarming. This proposal seems to continue to keep problematic circumstances “in house.” It does not commit to involving outside auditors or laypeople in canonical procedures. It does not specify who will be privy to the “transparency” cited. According to this action item, the bishops remain a group of people set apart.

In the same vein, the document declares that “The second criterion relates to authority in the Church. Because only the Pope has authority to discipline or remove bishops, we will assure that our measures will both respect that authority and protect the vulnerable from the abuse of ecclesial power.”

Although the document claims that it will collect a group of laypeople together and guarantee them independence and authority, this sentence reaffirms that only the pope can remove and discipline bishops. The laypeople involved in this venture will in fact have no authority. This sentence makes it clear that the bishops do not intend to make themselves subject to the committee they are forming.

***

What is the point of this round-up? To demonstrate that there are a lot of bishops who still don’t get it. To make it clear that there are Catholic organizations and individuals who will still back them up. To make it clear that the bishops are still committed to blaming anyone but themselves, and to keeping themselves free from the consequences of their actions, both now and in the future.

Previous Post

August 20, 2018

I Want to Believe: Fr. Stephanos Pedrano's Story

Next Post

August 26, 2018 I Wish I Could Believe: Marie's Story

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Approaching Mystery art Book Reviews Catholic Ghost Story Catholicism community Confession Current Events Dark Devotional Deconstruction Deconstruction Fellow Travelers I Want To Believe Interview Laudato Si Lent Mary Matthew's Letters Movie Reviews Music Reviews Our Charism Personal Essay Pilgrims Pope Francis Popular Piety Prayer Publishing Richard Beck Saints Satan Sheed and Ward Sick Pilgrim Charism Sick Pilgrim Chats Sick Pilgrim Events Sick Pilgrim Travelin' Medicine Show Sick Pilgrimage to The West Sick Pilgrims Small Joys Spiritual Autobiography Spooky Files of Ave Maria Magazine Spooky October Spooky Pilgrim Spooky Pilgrimage Strange Journey The Inklings Things Keeping Us Going Trying to Say God TV Reviews Uncategorized women in the Catholic Church Wonder Podcast Write the Vision

Select a Month February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I mocked a prophet for his baldness and was mauled by bears for my disrespect. Who are we?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Boys from Bethel Children of Israel Philistines Youths