Little House in the 21st Century

Last updated on: June 28, 2018 at 1:29 pm by Maren Grossman

Little House in the 21st Century 2018-06-28T13:29:07-05:00 Maren Grossman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This week, the American Library Association announced that it would be removing Laura Ingalls Wilder’s name from a children’s literature award. Having grown up with her stories and loved them, this makes me sad. At the same time, however, it’s almost impossible for a modern reader to read her books without a sense of discomfort that is entirely appropriate – after all, these events happened in a world that was very comfortable with racism. A hierarchy based on race was taken for granted, and there are scenes and phrases in the books that very much reflect this.

The ALA cited racist and stereotypical attitudes as their reason for removing Wilder’s name from the award. In response, organizations and individuals have suggested that Wilder’s “racism” only signifies that she was a product of her times. They point out that Wilder shows nuance in her attitudes about race, and that her depictions of her family include diverse attitudes about race.

Both perspectives have evidence to back them up. There is definitely racism and anti-Native American sentiment in Wilder’s books, but such instances are not without contrast in the text. The black-face minstrel show in which Pa performs in Little Town on the Prairie has as a foil the positive portrayal of the black doctor who saves the Ingalls family in Little House on the Prairie. (Although this runs uncomfortably parallel to modern circumstances in which people seek to be absolved of their racist comments by declaring that they have a black friend.) The constant refrain of, “Ma hated Indians,” is continually answered by Pa’s defense of Native Americans. One of the most moving scenes in the series is the chapter in Little House on the Prairie that shows the Native Americans leaving the area. The child Laura recognizes the humanity of these people forced from their home. She feels an intense sense of loss as she watches them process past her house. She breaks down, and sobbing and crying demands that her parents provide her with a “papoose.” To me this has never felt like an objectification of the baby, but has always seemed like a child’s way of expressing grief and the loss of something she does not understand.

To me, however, the real problem with the Little House books is not something that can be addressed by identifying and critiquing racist language and episodes. It’s not something that can even be addressed by nuanced depictions of those episodes. The real problem is that this beautiful depiction of family life takes place against the backdrop of Westward expansion. There are things happening off-screen that are truly horrible.

What does it mean to tell a story about Westward expansion, when Westward expansion is a story that takes place in the context of forced relocation and genocide? When we center the stories of white American settlers, we get beautiful stories about family life and successful struggle against hardship. What stories would we tell if we centered other communities during this time? What happens to stories like Laura Ingalls Wilder’s and tall tales like Johnny Appleseed’s when we look at them in the larger context of the history of Westward expansion? I love these stories and I don’t want to lose them. I also worry about what it means to love them. If we can’t come to terms with these issues in literature, how can we expect to come to terms with them in reality? Even the ALA’s declared reasons for renaming the award feel like an obfuscation to me. The problem isn’t Wilder or her nuanced-for-the-time attitudes about race. The problem is the larger context: the historical actions of a country.

We can say of Laura Ingalls Wilder that she was only a product of her time. But the problems of her time are not gone. We are still wrestling with the same issues. We know (or should know) that racism is still at play in America. We know that many African Americans and Native Americans are still suffering the affects of inter-generational poverty and trauma. Even now, their land is being taken away from them, while conservative publications use comparisons to that genocide to criticize liberals.* There are still people who want to keep certain ethnic groups out of the country. And America is still separating families and detaining people whom our government has decided don’t belong here.

Does this mean we need to get rid of the Little House books? No. But if people like Laura Ingalls Wilder were products of their time, I can’t help wondering what it means to be a product of our time. In our time, what is at stake is not the name of a book award from the ALA , or whether a much loved book series receives criticism. What is at stake is how we are going to respond when the racism that has always been in the background suddenly leaps to the foreground. Does being a product of our time mean that we are people for whom incarcerated children and police shootings are just part of the landscape, part of what’s taken for granted as normal?

I hope not.

* “America Is Over, But I Won’t Let It Go without an Epic Fight,” by Jesse Kelly appeared this week in The Federalist.

Maren Grossman is an assistant editor at Sick Pilgrim. She holds an M.A. in philosophy from Catholic University and currently lives in Pennsylvania with her family.

Previous Post

June 25, 2018

Sick Pilgrim Goes to the Movies: Black Panther

Next Post

July 1, 2018 Sick Pilgrim Goes to the Movies: Won't You Be My Neighbor?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Approaching Mystery art Book Reviews Catholic Ghost Story Catholicism community Confession Current Events Dark Devotional Deconstruction Deconstruction Fellow Travelers I Want To Believe Interview Laudato Si Lent Mary Matthew's Letters Movie Reviews Music Reviews Our Charism Personal Essay Pilgrims Pope Francis Popular Piety Prayer Publishing Richard Beck Saints Satan Sheed and Ward Sick Pilgrim Charism Sick Pilgrim Chats Sick Pilgrim Events Sick Pilgrim Travelin' Medicine Show Sick Pilgrimage to The West Sick Pilgrims Small Joys Spiritual Autobiography Spooky Files of Ave Maria Magazine Spooky October Spooky Pilgrim Spooky Pilgrimage Strange Journey The Inklings Things Keeping Us Going Trying to Say God TV Reviews Uncategorized women in the Catholic Church Wonder Podcast Write the Vision

Select a Month February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the youngest king of Judah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Josiah Asa Hezekiah Jehoshaphat