Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Empathy Mining

Home
Progressive Christian
Gun Rights Advocates are Focusing on the Wrong Part of the 2nd Amendment

Gun Rights Advocates are Focusing on the Wrong Part of the 2nd Amendment

Last updated on: June 1, 2022 at 1:33 pm by Shane Phipps

Gun Rights Advocates are Focusing on the Wrong Part of the 2nd Amendment 2022-06-01T13:33:58-04:00 Shane Phipps

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Before I begin, let me give you a little personal background on myself. I am a gun owner. I own three shotguns, two rifles, one muzzleloader, and one handgun. I used to be a member of the National Rifle Association. At one point, I was an avid deer hunter, turkey hunter, and outdoorsman in general. I also used to think that to vote for a Democrat would be a vote that would endanger my right to own the guns I have. By now, you probably sense a “but” coming…so here it comes…BUT I’VE GROWN. While I still own all those guns, I now distance myself as far as possible from the NRA. I also have moved much farther left on the political spectrum and now find it a real challenge to find Republican candidates that I feel comfortable voting for…I’m still open to that, but it’s getting harder. You see, none of the guns I own—none of them—are capable of shooting more than six shots without having to be reloaded. That is a VERY crucial point in the gun control argument. To my way of thinking, it is the ONLY point worth attacking in the gun control argument. The insight I am about to share, I believe, makes it PERFECTLY CLEAR that it would be the way that EACH and EVERY founding father would have agreed with. Please read on and if you feel that I am in error, please feel free to set me straight in the comments section.

I believe in the right of the individual citizen of the United States to own guns. There are many perfectly sane reasons for owning a gun. Hunting, shooting sports, protection, and just because it’s our right. I get that. What I don’t get is this infatuation with AR-15 style weapons. All the other types of guns I listed have legitimate purposes that are, in my view, protected by the 2nd Amendment…to a point. That is a very important point. The main difference between hunting, recreational, and self-protection guns and handguns is the capacity of the rate of fire. The AR-15, the model of gun that is responsible for the lion’s share of mass shootings in the U.S., is capable of shooting many hundreds of rounds of ammunition in the space of one minute. Let that sink in…

Hundreds of rounds per minute…

That was never, NEVER, NEVER EVER, on the table when the founding fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment!

At best, if I were to load up all my guns (see the list I just posted above)…ALL of them, I could probably fire AT MOST 30 to 40 shots in a minute. And that would require incredible dexterity on my part, juggling seven different guns. In a real-time active shooter situation, I wouldn’t be able to shoot a whole bunch of people before someone took me out. That’s just a fact. It can’t be argued.

By contrast, a single gunman with a single AR-15, or similar weapon, could take out dozens of people before anyone knew what was going on. That’s just a fact. It can’t be argued.

I have more than enough guns. I can protect my home and put meat on my table and have a blast shooting targets to my heart’s content. What I can’t do with my personal arsenal is go on a quick and efficient killing spree. I’m totally fine with that.

Whenever the 2nd Amendment is debated, two passages are always at the forefront of the debate…”militia” and “shall not be infringed.”

Some of my fellow progressives focus too much on the word “militia,” in my opinion. They look at that word and take it to its most literal interpretation, that it means some sort of formal, or semi-formal private military unit. I have never seen it that way. I have always taken it more loosely than that. I believe that we individual citizens do indeed make up a modern militia. I believe that we do have the right to own weapons to protect our family and property.

Some of my right-wing friends, I believe, focus too much on the “shall not be infringed” phrasing. They often take that to mean that there is no such thing as a constitutional limit to any kind of weapon. They truly feel that it is proper and necessary for individual citizens to have legal access to any and all forms of firearm or weaponry.

But there is a key word in the 2nd Amendment that I think gets lost in the debate way too often. That word is “regulated.” I looked up the definition of “regulate” in the dictionary and it pretty much makes my point here for me. Here is the definition of regulate…

“To control or maintain the rate or speed of a machine or process…”

Ladies and gentlemen, I submit this as a clear road to a mandate to control the rate of fire of weapons that are legal to own for the general public. I think it is clear.

At the time the 2nd Amendment was written, not only did we not have multi-fire guns—every gun was a single-shot weapon that had to be reloaded each time it was fired—we didn’t even have cone shaped bullets (we had round musket balls). The accuracy of a weapon in the 1790s was unreliable outside of 50 yards and the rate of fire was 3 to 4 shots per minute MAXIMUM!

There is one reason why guns such as the AR-15 exist. That reason is to kill a whole bunch of people in a short amount of time. That’s it.

I come from a hunting background, and I can tell you a fact about the hunting community that might come as a surprise to you. Within the hunting world, there is often division between those who use “modern” weapons and those who use “primitive” weapons. Hunters who prefer to use high-powered rifles to take game are sometimes looked down upon by hunters who prefer to use more primitive weapons like single-shot muzzleloaders or archery equipment. I can tell you from first-hand experience that it causes a great deal of divisiveness within the hunting community. Yet, when it comes to gun control, those hunters who look down on people who choose to use the most efficient killing tool for taking big game are the very same people who scream for the rights of people to own the rapid-fire death spraying machines such as the AR-15 for ordinary citizens. It seems that a lot of hunters are for strict gun control when it comes to hunting animals but don’t want any restrictions for hunting humans.

My biggest concern in all of this is that SO MANY of these people I’m talking about are self-professed Christians. I know many of them intimately and they are truly beautiful people who are the salt of the earth. But they have bought so heavily into the conservative Christian political narrative that they have become blinded to the damage their voting does.

I have a great deal of empathy for those people. I was once one of them. I just pray for them to have discernment when it comes to the gun control debate. If they would approach the gun control debate with the same common sense that they approach the hunting weapon debate, we may actually achieve some real change.

Previous Post

May 25, 2022

It's Time for Pro-Lifers to Be Pro-Life

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 150 word story 2nd Amendment AARP abortion addiction aging alcoholism Anderson Wigwam Andrew Jackson Appalachia Basketball bias bigotry Black Lives Matter Christianity Christmas, Constitution, Bill of Rights Civil War Clinton cloning confirmation bias Conservation Constitution Controversial Creationism Creepy tales David Bowie depression Dogs Education Election Electoral College Empathy Environmental Evolution exvangelical faith Family Family History Fantasy Genealogy Genesis George Washington Ghetto Global Warming Gun Control health care High School Basketball Hillary History Hockey homosexuality Hoosier Hysteria Hoosiers Hunting immigration income inequality Interview ISTEP Jurassic Park Kaepernick Ken Hamm Kids say the Darndest things LGBTQ Love MAGA Manifest Destiny Merit Pay Mike Pence Muhammad Ali Multiple Perspectives Music Music Review Nashville News media NHL No Child Left Behind NRA Paradox Parenting Pence Perspective Politics POTUS Poverty Predators Race Religion religious freedom Sci Fi Science Secret of Life sexual harrassment Short Stories Slavery Small Town Indiana Smashville Social Commentary social media sports Stress technology Terrorism Thomas Jefferson Trauma Trump Turning 50 Uncategorized war Washington DC White Privilege wooly mammoths words in red Writing Writing Process Writing, Writing Process Young Earth

Select a Month June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 August 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Where does Scripture say, "do not let the sun go down on your anger"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Genesis Ephesians Luke Proverbs

Support this
Column