It’s High Time to Reinstate the Ban on Rapid-Fire-Death-Spraying-Machines

Last updated on: August 16, 2019 at 12:01 pm by Shane Phipps

It’s High Time to Reinstate the Ban on Rapid-Fire-Death-Spraying-Machines 2019-08-16T12:01:06-04:00 Shane Phipps

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I don’t like the term “assault weapon.” In fact, I hate it. It’s vague, ominous, and contentious. It does nothing to define what it is supposed to be referencing. And, quite frankly, it hurts the cause of sensible gun control. An assault weapon is anything you can use to assault someone. It can be a bazooka, a flame thrower, a machete, a pocket knife, or a good stout bust of Thomas Jefferson. Nobody is calling for a ban on pocket knives, machetes, or busts of Thomas Jefferson. And nobody is calling for a ban on handguns, shotguns, or rifles that have genuine uses as tools for sport or self-defense. What needs to go are those types of weapons that have only one purpose; wiping out as many people in the shortest amount of time possible. So, let’s call it a ban on rapid-fire-death-spraying-machines.

It’s too easy for a well-indoctrinated NRA type–I’m writing to you now as a former member of that organization, so I know all their tricks–to laugh off “assault weapons” bans. They’ve all been taught that the Left likes that term because it can be easily amended to mean any gun. They think that’s the long-game. I know, I once bought into that garbage. But it’s harder to defend the right to own rapid-fire-death-spraying-machines. And I know a lot of conservative gun owners who are not opposed to banning that type of weapon, but they still fear that term “assault weapon.”

What we are talking about here is the type of rifle–now legally available to anyone who passes a background check–which is capable of firing hundreds of rounds of ammunition per minute. These guns have magazines that can be switched out in seconds. Only a small percentage of states have laws that strictly limit the capacity of those magazines. Most of the states that do, limit the capacity to no more than ten rounds of ammunition. That’s better than no limit at all, but when a killer has a dozen magazines full of ten rounds that can be switched as quickly as taking a couple of steps, that’s not very effective. Then there are many states where the magazine capacity is pretty much unregulated, so some magazines hold 100 or more rounds of ammunition which can be fired, non-stop, as quickly as the shooter can pull the trigger. This is why gunmen can kill dozens of people in the time it took me to type this sentence. In both the recent mass shootings in Ohio and Texas, the weapons used were purchased legally and there was no law limiting the capacity of the magazines. These terrorists were completely within the law until the moment they initially squeezed the trigger. The photo below shows the type of magazine used in the Dayton shooting.

If you don’t see a problem with anything in the last paragraph, you are a fanatical extremest, plain and simple.

I own about 10 guns. I have a few different shotguns, a .22 rifle, a high-powered, .270 caliber rifle, a couple more primitive muzzleloading rifles, and one handgun. Of all the guns I own, the largest capacity of ammunition any are capable of is six rounds. Could I, were I so inclined, go on a killing spree with my guns? The answer, of course, is yes. But could I possibly kill more than a dozen people in a matter of seconds? Not a chance. By the time I clumsily reloaded my 5 or 6 rounds of ammunition, one at a time, by hand, the chances are, someone would stop me from a second round of shooting.

Here is the point; gun fanatics will tell you that no legislation can end mass shootings. This is a stone-cold fact that I must, reluctantly, agree with. They will also say, “if you ban assault weapons, only criminals will have assault weapons.” Again, hard to argue with that–although most right-wingers are not able to apply that same logic to other topics, like abortion, for instance. But this is also a fact; we can, indeed, create laws that can be effective in reducing the number of mass shootings that kill 6 or more people. This is a proven fact because we have done so in the past. From 1994 to 2004, the types of weapons and magazine capacity limits to which I referred above were, indeed, outlawed in the United States. And, what’s more, the law worked. Did it stop mass shootings? Of course not. Did it effectively reduce the number of mass shootings where 6 or more people were killed? You bet it did. And then, due to a change in the political landscape with Republicans controlling Congress and the White House, coupled with the lingering national paranoia after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the law was allowed to expire after it’s 10-year run.

It is high time we reinstate that law.

I promise, nobody’s coming for your grandad’s hunting rifle (or mine), but if you happen to own a rapid-fire-death-spraying-machine, it’s time to take one for the team.

Sorry, not sorry.

Previous Post

August 5, 2019

Yes, We Have a Mental Health Crisis in America. It Starts in the White House.

Next Post

August 16, 2019 Christian Trump Supporter, Your Clandestine Wish has Been Revealed

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 150 word story 2nd Amendment AARP abortion addiction aging alcoholism Anderson Wigwam Andrew Jackson Appalachia Basketball bias bigotry Black Lives Matter Christianity Christmas, Constitution, Bill of Rights Civil War Clinton cloning confirmation bias Conservation Constitution Controversial Creationism Creepy tales David Bowie depression Dogs Education Election Electoral College Empathy Environmental Evolution exvangelical faith Family Family History Fantasy Genealogy Genesis George Washington Ghetto Global Warming Gun Control health care High School Basketball Hillary History Hockey homosexuality Hoosier Hysteria Hoosiers Hunting immigration income inequality Interview ISTEP Jurassic Park Kaepernick Ken Hamm Kids say the Darndest things LGBTQ Love MAGA Manifest Destiny Merit Pay Mike Pence Muhammad Ali Multiple Perspectives Music Music Review Nashville News media NHL No Child Left Behind NRA Paradox Parenting Pence Perspective Politics POTUS Poverty Predators Race Religion religious freedom Sci Fi Science Secret of Life sexual harrassment Short Stories Slavery Small Town Indiana Smashville Social Commentary social media sports Stress technology Terrorism Thomas Jefferson Trauma Trump Turning 50 Uncategorized war Washington DC White Privilege wooly mammoths words in red Writing Writing Process Writing, Writing Process Young Earth

Select a Month June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 August 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the prophet who pronounced doom on Jezebel and Ahab?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Elisha Isaiah Elijah Hosea

Support this
Column