Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Empathy Mining

Home
Progressive Christian
Conservative Christian, Please Provide us with a Handy Flow Chart of Sins

Conservative Christian, Please Provide us with a Handy Flow Chart of Sins

Last updated on: April 1, 2019 at 5:45 pm by Shane Phipps

Conservative Christian, Please Provide us with a Handy Flow Chart of Sins 2019-04-01T17:45:11-04:00 Shane Phipps

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve just come from a debate thread on my last article about Pete Buttigieg. In that article, I point out a lot of qualities and qualifications possessed by this new and rising star on the Democratic roster of candidates for President. Among them were that Buttigieg is a Christian and he is gay. The first comment out of the box set off a rather lengthy debate. That debate led me to write this article.

The commenter started by taking me to task about Buttigieg’s Christianity.

“Buttigieg is not a Christian anymore than Trump is. He is doing something that is despicable in sight of God and I wouldn’t trust his policies anymore than Bernie Sanders. I don’t trust him at all.”

Here we have two separate issues. If you have a problem with Buttigieg’s policies, that’s valid. But the first part raised my concern. I responded in kind.

“How does what [Buttigieg] does in his bedroom, in a loving, monogamous, and committed marriage, have anything to do with his trustworthiness or his qualifications to lead?”

You can probably predict where the debate went from there. I started listing all the biblical sins that we all commit on a nearly daily basis, putting other things before God (1st Commandment), eating too much, drinking too much, speeding, getting tattoos, mixing different seeds in the same field, allowing women in church with uncovered heads–all the standard comebacks in this kind of debate. His response to that follows…

“Just because people get carried away with things doesn’t mean they are putting idols before God. Secondly, don’t bring up Leviticus society rules like tattoos and mixing plants as those rules do not apply…The head covering aspect is not dealing with sin but Paul suggesting to women that they must treat themselves with dignity. Lastly, just because all of us sin at some point in our lives doesn’t mean it is okay.”

There’s a lot to digest there. First of all, every pastor I’ve ever heard speak on the subject–and I’ve heard many–completely disagree with his first assertion about idols before God. Then, he wants to disregard most of Leviticus, but let’s keep in the “gay stuff” (more on that later). Then he writes off Paul’s condemnation of women in church with uncovered heads as a mere suggestion while holding fast and firm to Paul’s comments about homosexuality mentioned in the verses just previous to the head covering admonition.

Then I asked him, “so, what Leviticus says about homosexuality applies but the other stuff doesn’t”, and what Paul says about homosexuality applies but the bit about women covering their heads, not so much?

At this point I asked him for a flow chart…

“Can you provide me with a flow chart so I can determine which parts of scripture are still sins and which parts aren’t sins anymore? It gets very confusing. That’s why I generally pay pretty close attention to what Jesus said. He said nothing about homosexuality, by the way. Must not have been too important to him. Judging people was, though.”

His response was short and equally as confounding.

“Moral laws still stand while ritual and society rules do not.”

Interesting take. I wondered where he got it, so I asked him to provide a verse where that is spelled out (I sure hadn’t read it). His response was, predictably, a deflection.

“Tell me where the law still applies as Israel is gone, the temple is gone and the law has been fulfilled. I am eager to hear your response.”

Though he did not answer my question, I was happy to answer his.

“I don’t think those laws still apply, neither do I think it of homosexuality. Most of the times the Bible speaks of it, the actual sin was lust and, often, rape. the Bible mentions nothing about monogamous, loving, same sex unions. Jesus said nothing about homosexuality. Paul did, but right after that, he condemned women in church without covered heads. You said the covered head thing no longer applies but all the gay stuff does. That’s why I need a flow chart, it’s so confusing.”

The debate sort of petered out from there.

But my point was made. Conservative Christians spend so much time being legal eagles (very Pharisee-like) that they become helplessly ensnared in their own traps. They wiggle and squirm, trying to explain away first this scripture and then that while insisting that this one is still good and that one is, too.

I’m left to come to the conclusion that some conservative Christians do this so that they can claim to live a life without sin. Sure, they admit that they have sinned in the past, but when you press them, they can’t ever seem to admit that they still sin daily. That’s why they love to focus on certain parts of the Bible that they feel comfortable in using to condemn others while excusing away dozens of verses that surround those they’ve cherry picked.

Take it from me, they don’t like it when this is pointed out to them.

Next time this happens to you, ask for a flow chart. It will probably end the debate.

Check out this companion podcast.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/1Q1DM7776FtLQtYxPxvT8y?si=sUI_6ErjSl6vKw8Lc3-YKQ

Multiple Perspectives

Previous Post

March 31, 2019

Pete Buttigieg puts Conservative Christianity on Damascus Road

Next Post

April 8, 2019 Social Media and the 24-Hour News Cycle is Depressing a Generation

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 150 word story 2nd Amendment AARP abortion addiction aging alcoholism Anderson Wigwam Andrew Jackson Appalachia Basketball bias bigotry Black Lives Matter Christianity Christmas, Constitution, Bill of Rights Civil War Clinton cloning confirmation bias Conservation Constitution Controversial Creationism Creepy tales David Bowie depression Dogs Education Election Electoral College Empathy Environmental Evolution exvangelical faith Family Family History Fantasy Genealogy Genesis George Washington Ghetto Global Warming Gun Control health care High School Basketball Hillary History Hockey homosexuality Hoosier Hysteria Hoosiers Hunting immigration income inequality Interview ISTEP Jurassic Park Kaepernick Ken Hamm Kids say the Darndest things LGBTQ Love MAGA Manifest Destiny Merit Pay Mike Pence Muhammad Ali Multiple Perspectives Music Music Review Nashville News media NHL No Child Left Behind NRA Paradox Parenting Pence Perspective Politics POTUS Poverty Predators Race Religion religious freedom Sci Fi Science Secret of Life sexual harrassment Short Stories Slavery Small Town Indiana Smashville Social Commentary social media sports Stress technology Terrorism Thomas Jefferson Trauma Trump Turning 50 Uncategorized war Washington DC White Privilege wooly mammoths words in red Writing Writing Process Writing, Writing Process Young Earth

Select a Month June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 August 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the ecumenical council where Roman Catholicism addressed modernization in the 1960s?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Vatican II Trent Ephesus Council of Nicaea

Support this
Column