Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Empathy Mining

Home
Progressive Christian
Where is the Line Between Unity and Liberty?

Where is the Line Between Unity and Liberty?

Last updated on: December 4, 2017 at 2:34 pm by Shane Phipps

Where is the Line Between Unity and Liberty? 2017-12-04T14:34:32-04:00 Shane Phipps

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

C0BE789C-4435-499C-A9B3-7752E6103451

Where is the Line Between Unity and Liberty?

This question has been eating away at me for a long time. Actually, it’s been hovering over the Christian faith and, indeed, our nation for centuries. Where is the tipping point when individual freedoms begin to erode the unity that holds us together and makes us strong? At what point does the push for unity step on individual liberty and ultimately drive us apart? It’s a doozy of a question and, as with most such topics, no one seems to have the answer. But it is a question worth pondering, which is exactly what I intend to do here.

I’ll start with the church, since that is where my most recent wrestling match with this ponderous conundrum began. In a small group study, this idea of the need for the church to have a united front came up. It was a good and honest, but somewhat uncomfortable discussion–and, of course, we didn’t come to any real consensus–but we did raise some important questions. The one question that weighed heavily upon me as I left our discussion was this; What things are essential for the church to be united about and which are not?

Our little group is far from the first to tackle this issue, of course. This question was certainly found in the roots of the Protestant Reformation. Those who followed Luther’s lead believed that it was essential to be unified in the notion that salvation could be received through faith alone. From that point on, Christianity was splintered.

There is a famous quote which lays out the foundation of this topic…

“In necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus caritas”

–Marco Antonio de Dominis (1617)

Translated from the Latin, it’s “In necessary things unity; in uncertain things freedom; in all things love.”

I’ve loved that quote from the first time I heard it. I believe that if we are to find any common ground on this conundrum, that quote will need to be front and center in our minds.

Christians can quickly get bogged down in theological debate. After Luther’s original Protestant split, it didn’t take too long for the divisions to begin within his new sect of the faith. Those divisions escalated quickly and have left us with a Christian landscape cluttered with seemingly countless denominations, each with their own ideas about what things are essential for their followers to believe.

So there it is…what is essential?

I have my own theory on that, but who am I to proclaim that I am right? My answer to that question focusses on what Jesus said. My understanding is that if one believes in Christ through faith, accepts his gift of mercy, and endeavors to follow him, then there is salvation.

Someone once asked Jesus what was essential for a Christian to do and Jesus’ answer was a very direct and simple one. He said that it was to love God with all your heart and to love your neighbor as yourself.

Jesus didn’t seem to get bogged down in a lot of theological details. In fact, he seemed very troubled by those leaders of the church in his time who did dwell on the mechanics of the faith. Yet, more than 2,000 years later, we continue to squabble over those kinds of things.

Is it essential to practice infant baptism or is it more effective to wait until children are old enough to willingly participate?

Is it essential to believe in a literal seven 24-hour days of creation and a 6 to 10,000-year-old earth or is it acceptable to leave the creation timeline open for other possibilities that would allow for evolution science and creation to coexist?

Is it essential to believe that the sacraments of communion are transformed into the actual flesh and blood of Christ or is it acceptable to believe that they are merely symbols of Christ’s sacrifice?

These are but a few examples of the kinds of theological details that have been debated for centuries.

I don’t claim to have the answers to any of those questions–however, I do have concerns about whether or not they are essential. That is a crucial question. If a denomination presents those kinds of things as essentials, they are running a great risk of pushing people away from the outset.

Church leaders, in my opinion, would do well in today’s climate to use Dominis as a guide–“**In necessary things unity; in uncertain things freedom; in all things love–**and to take the last part, in all things love, especially to heart. Often, when we get bogged down in the details of theology, the basics get overshadowed–the message of Christ can become lost like a ball in the weeds. It would be a tragedy to allow something that is not essential to drive people away from the Gospel.

This whole argument can be applied to our nation as a whole, as well. We have become so divided over political ideology that I fear we run the real risk of splintering off into multiple countries just as the church has splintered into multiple denominations.

What if we applied the Dominis statement to our nation-“In necessary things unity; in uncertain things freedom; in all things love.”

Is it essential that we change the laws on abortion or is it ok to accept the ruling of our Supreme Court and counsel women about other options, leaving the ultimate choice up to them?

Is it essential that we employ stricter gun laws or is it ok to realize that there are already more guns in this country than people and accept that they are never going to go away?

Is it essential that marriage be between a man and a woman or is it preferable to lovingly accept everyone for who they are and allow them equal treatment under the law?

These are but a few examples of the kinds of political details that have been debated for decades.

I don’t claim to have the answers to any of these questions, but what if we could agree that they weren’t essential in the long run? What if we continued to allow freedom in the uncertain things and moved forward with all things in love?

What if, in the process of moving forward with all things in love, we found true unity?

Would the details seem so essential anymore?

Far fetched, I know, but a guy can dream, can’t he?

Previous Post

November 28, 2017

Supporting the Orange Man and Ignoring the Red Words: Orange and Red Don't Mix

Next Post

December 3, 2017 These are a few of my favorite things

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 150 word story 2nd Amendment AARP abortion addiction aging alcoholism Anderson Wigwam Andrew Jackson Appalachia Basketball bias bigotry Black Lives Matter Christianity Christmas, Constitution, Bill of Rights Civil War Clinton cloning confirmation bias Conservation Constitution Controversial Creationism Creepy tales David Bowie depression Dogs Education Election Electoral College Empathy Environmental Evolution exvangelical faith Family Family History Fantasy Genealogy Genesis George Washington Ghetto Global Warming Gun Control health care High School Basketball Hillary History Hockey homosexuality Hoosier Hysteria Hoosiers Hunting immigration income inequality Interview ISTEP Jurassic Park Kaepernick Ken Hamm Kids say the Darndest things LGBTQ Love MAGA Manifest Destiny Merit Pay Mike Pence Muhammad Ali Multiple Perspectives Music Music Review Nashville News media NHL No Child Left Behind NRA Paradox Parenting Pence Perspective Politics POTUS Poverty Predators Race Religion religious freedom Sci Fi Science Secret of Life sexual harrassment Short Stories Slavery Small Town Indiana Smashville Social Commentary social media sports Stress technology Terrorism Thomas Jefferson Trauma Trump Turning 50 Uncategorized war Washington DC White Privilege wooly mammoths words in red Writing Writing Process Writing, Writing Process Young Earth

Select a Month June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 August 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What book contains the shortest chapter in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Proverbs Obadiah Haggai Psalms

Support this
Column