Where Do We Draw the Green Line?

Last updated on: March 5, 2016 at 3:44 am by Shane Phipps

Where Do We Draw the Green Line? 2016-03-05T03:44:33-04:00 Shane Phipps

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A major news story this week got me to thinking about about the environment. It seems one of the largest hardwood flooring retailers in the country, Lumber Liquidators, got caught buying some wood from a Chinese distributor. That timber had been illegally harvested from restricted areas of Russia that contain the last 500 wild Siberian Tigers on earth. This endangered forest is also home to another endangered big cat, the Amur Leopard. I found this to be disturbing news, indeed. It begs the question, how common is this kind of thing? How often do we, as consumers, unwittingly participate in the destruction of important parts of our planet? I suspect we do so, mostly ignorantly, every day. I suppose it depends on where we draw the line between necessary consumption and irresponsible wanton waste.

One of my favorite books is by John McPhee. It is called Encounters with the Archdruid. In this book, written in the 1970s, McPhee travels around the country with legendary environmental activist, David Brower (Sierra Club), as he debates developers and dam builders in wilderness areas. Brower argues for the side of preservationists who claim that wilderness areas should be completely untouched, free even from access roads and such. The men he debated argued for responsible conservation, or managing the resources responsibly, using them sustainably and opening them for public enjoyment. The debates are fascinating to read and McPhee ultimately leaves it to the reader to pass final judgement on the merits of the arguments. I see both sides, as usual.

One thing I am sure of is that most of us remain blissfully ignorant of our carbon footprint. We guzzle fossil fuels because it’s what we do. We buy food that has been processed with chemicals that can be harmful to the environment because it is convenient and often cheaper. Some of us, apparently, floor our homes with wood from trees that once sheltered one of the most precious endangered species on our planet, the greatest of the big cats, the Siberian Tiger. The list goes on and on. I don’t know where to draw the line as a consumer, but I am beginning to be more aware that there is a line.

I love nature. I spend as much time in it as I can. I even consider myself a conservationist, but not the kind you probably think of when you hear that word. I see value in preservation. I like to think that there are places left untouched and unspoiled. But I also see the value in responsible conservation, that is to say, reasonable management and use of natural resources in a sustainable way.

In the interest of full disclosure, let me insert here that I am a hunter. That’s right, I hunt, kill, and eat, deer and turkey each year. Guess what…that makes a conservationist. That’s right. The most misunderstood aspect of hunting, to the non-hunters or anti-hunters is that no group does more for conservation than hunters. I would also argue that no group cares more about the overall health and well-being of the herds of game animals in this country than hunters do.

I hunt for many reasons. First and foremost, I hunt because…I am a hunter. When I hunt, I feel a deep connection with a part of me that lives in the ancient past. I don’t hunt because I enjoy the kill. Don’t get me wrong, there is an element of excitement at the moment of truth, a powerful surge of adrenaline so powerful that it almost hurts. But with each successful hunt, mixed in with the adrenaline and excitement, is a very healthy dose of respect for the animal and a real sense of sorrow at the taking of life. That moment connects me with my table fare on an intimate level. You can’t get that from a supermarket. And quite frankly, I am much more comfortable with the way my deer meat gets to my table than with the thought of what a cow went through to get to the grocery store beef aisle.

Please don’t confuse modern, ethical hunters with modern poachers or the unethical market hunters of the past.

In the 19th century, as Americans opened up the frontier of the lands west of the Appalachian Mountains, market hunting (that is wide spread killing of anything and everything for the selling of hides) took a huge toll on the game populations. Large game species disappeared from much of their original habitat. Buffalo, elk, cougars, bears, deer, turkeys, and the like, which once roamed through much of the midwest and southeast, were completely hunted out of those areas. Market hunting is NOT the same as conservation hunting. Today, hunters are one of the most vital cogs in the machinery of the conservation movement. Founding fathers of the modern conservation movement such as Theodore Roosevelt, John Muir, and Aldo Leopold (all avid hunters and sportsmen) worked diligently in the early 20th century to change the face of hunting. The ugly practice of market hunting finally vanished and the sport of hunting took center stage as a conservation tool. It was the dollars spent by hunters that reintroduced deer, turkey, (and elk in some areas) to their original home range. Today, there are more deer and turkey in most of their original home range than ever before!

Yet, having too many deer is no small problem either. There simply aren’t enough natural predators out there to keep deer numbers in check. Nationally, deer cause more than 1 billion dollars annually in farm crop damage. Deer-car accidents kill about 100 people in the U.S. each year and cause more than 1 billion dollars in property damage. In fact, deer kill more people in the U.S. each year than sharks, alligators, bears, or rattlesnakes! Imagine how much those numbers would go up if hunters were not helping to reduce the numbers to manageable levels.

Hunters give resource managers an important tool in managing the game populations that might exceed the carrying capacity of their habitat and threaten the well being of their species, other species or, in some cases, damage human health or safety. In the process of killing a select few of the herd or flock, hunters play the role of improving the overall quality of life for the rest of the animals. Hunting reduces interspecies competition for food, water, and shelter, lessening stress and mortality among the remaining animals.

Hunters also are the key component in the government being able to allocate large parcels of land to be used for conservation and wildlife management. Each year more than $200 million in hunter’s federal excise tax money goes to state agencies to support their wildlife management programs. Since 1934, over $700 million dollars collected through Duck Stamp sales has gone to help the government buy and set aside over 5.2 million acres (8,100 square miles) of habitat for the National Wildlife Refuge System. That is over 8,000 square miles of wild land that will go undeveloped and provide refuge for all manner of wildlife, thanks to hunters.

In recent years, hunters have developed programs that provide a lot of food for the homeless and prisons as well. Programs have been put in place in most states where hunters can donate their deer meat to organizations which distribute it to those who need it most. Because of this successful program, tons upon tons of nutritious protein have helped millions of people who sorely needed it.

So where do we draw the green line? I don’t have the answer myself, but it is clear to me that we need to find common ground here in our own country, with the understanding that there are many perspectives and approaches to conservation, and find workable solutions in that common ground, somewhere in the middle. We also could do well to educate ourselves about where the imported products we buy are actually coming from. The Siberian Tigers, all 500 of them, would appreciate it.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 24, 2016

No Citizen Left Behind

Next Post

March 25, 2016 Of Politics and Poker...We're "All In"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 150 word story 2nd Amendment AARP abortion addiction aging alcoholism Anderson Wigwam Andrew Jackson Appalachia Basketball bias bigotry Black Lives Matter Christianity Christmas, Constitution, Bill of Rights Civil War Clinton cloning confirmation bias Conservation Constitution Controversial Creationism Creepy tales David Bowie depression Dogs Education Election Electoral College Empathy Environmental Evolution exvangelical faith Family Family History Fantasy Genealogy Genesis George Washington Ghetto Global Warming Gun Control health care High School Basketball Hillary History Hockey homosexuality Hoosier Hysteria Hoosiers Hunting immigration income inequality Interview ISTEP Jurassic Park Kaepernick Ken Hamm Kids say the Darndest things LGBTQ Love MAGA Manifest Destiny Merit Pay Mike Pence Muhammad Ali Multiple Perspectives Music Music Review Nashville News media NHL No Child Left Behind NRA Paradox Parenting Pence Perspective Politics POTUS Poverty Predators Race Religion religious freedom Sci Fi Science Secret of Life sexual harrassment Short Stories Slavery Small Town Indiana Smashville Social Commentary social media sports Stress technology Terrorism Thomas Jefferson Trauma Trump Turning 50 Uncategorized war Washington DC White Privilege wooly mammoths words in red Writing Writing Process Writing, Writing Process Young Earth

Select a Month June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 August 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Hebrews define as "confidence in what we hope for"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Salvation Faith Righteousness Love

Support this
Column